Risk Factors Associated with Urologic Intervention in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Renal Colic

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2015-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.085
Justin W. Yan MD, MSc, FRCPC, Shelley L. McLeod MSc, Marcia L. Edmonds MD, FRCPC, MSc, Robert J. Sedran MD, FRCPC, MSc, Karl D. Theakston MD, MSc
{"title":"Risk Factors Associated with Urologic Intervention in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Renal Colic","authors":"Justin W. Yan MD, MSc, FRCPC,&nbsp;Shelley L. McLeod MSc,&nbsp;Marcia L. Edmonds MD, FRCPC, MSc,&nbsp;Robert J. Sedran MD, FRCPC, MSc,&nbsp;Karl D. Theakston MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Whereas most patients with urolithiasis pass their stones spontaneously and require only symptomatic management, a minority will require urologic intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>Our primary objective was to confirm previously reported risk factors and to identify additional predictors of urologic intervention within 90 days, for emergency department (ED) patients with suspected </span>renal colic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to one of two tertiary care EDs with suspected renal colic over a 20-month period. Multivariate </span>logistic regression models determined predictor variables independently associated with urologic intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of the 565 patients included in the analysis, 220 (38.9%) patients had a ureteric stone visualized on diagnostic imaging. Eighty-four patients (14.9%) had urologic intervention within 90 days of their initial ED visit. Urinary nitrites (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–13.6), stone size ≥ 5 mm (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4–7.4), proximal ureteric stone (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5–6.4), age ≥ 50 years (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.0), </span>tachycardia<span> at triage (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.4), urinary leukocyte esterase (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.5), abnormal serum white blood cells (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.3), and history of renal colic (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.1) were factors independently associated with urologic intervention within 90 days.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study reports eight risk factors associated with urologic intervention within 90 days in patients presenting to the ED with renal colic. These risk factors should be considered when making management, prognostic, and disposition decisions for patients with suspected urolithiasis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"49 2","pages":"Pages 130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.085","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467915001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background

Whereas most patients with urolithiasis pass their stones spontaneously and require only symptomatic management, a minority will require urologic intervention.

Objective

Our primary objective was to confirm previously reported risk factors and to identify additional predictors of urologic intervention within 90 days, for emergency department (ED) patients with suspected renal colic.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to one of two tertiary care EDs with suspected renal colic over a 20-month period. Multivariate logistic regression models determined predictor variables independently associated with urologic intervention.

Results

Of the 565 patients included in the analysis, 220 (38.9%) patients had a ureteric stone visualized on diagnostic imaging. Eighty-four patients (14.9%) had urologic intervention within 90 days of their initial ED visit. Urinary nitrites (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–13.6), stone size ≥ 5 mm (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4–7.4), proximal ureteric stone (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5–6.4), age ≥ 50 years (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.0), tachycardia at triage (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.4), urinary leukocyte esterase (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.5), abnormal serum white blood cells (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.3), and history of renal colic (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.1) were factors independently associated with urologic intervention within 90 days.

Conclusions

Our study reports eight risk factors associated with urologic intervention within 90 days in patients presenting to the ED with renal colic. These risk factors should be considered when making management, prognostic, and disposition decisions for patients with suspected urolithiasis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疑似肾绞痛急诊科患者泌尿外科干预的相关危险因素
背景:虽然大多数尿石症患者可以自行排出结石,只需要对症处理,但少数患者需要泌尿外科干预。我们的主要目的是确认先前报道的危险因素,并确定急诊部(ED)疑似肾绞痛患者90天内泌尿系统干预的其他预测因素。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是在20个月的时间里就诊于两名三级急诊中的一名疑似肾绞痛的成年患者。多变量逻辑回归模型确定了与泌尿系统干预独立相关的预测变量。结果在565例患者中,220例(38.9%)患者在诊断影像上可见输尿管结石。84例患者(14.9%)在首次急诊科就诊后90天内接受了泌尿外科干预。尿亚硝酸盐(比值比[OR] 4.2, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.3-13.6),结石大小≥5 mm (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4-7.4),输尿管近端结石(OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.4),年龄≥50岁(OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.0),分诊时心动过速(OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.4),尿白细胞酯酶(OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.5),血清白细胞异常(OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3),肾绞痛史(OR 1.8,95% CI 1.1-3.1)是90天内泌尿系统干预的独立相关因素。一项研究报告了8个与ED合并肾绞痛患者90天内泌尿系统干预相关的危险因素。在对疑似尿石症患者进行管理、预后和处置决策时,应考虑这些危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Phantom Scanning in Point-of-Care Ultrasound After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Impact of Clinical Presentation in a Single-Center Analysis” Comment on “Age-Adjusted D-Dimer vs. Traditional D-Dimer to Rule Out Acute Aortic Syndromes” Critical Appraisal of “Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Vasopressors in Pre-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” American Academy of Emergency Medicine Fatal Polydrug Intoxication Involving Synthetic Cathinones in Taiwan: A Case Series and Emergency Management Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1