Preventive effect of omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy against postoperative complications: a meta-analysis.

Hepato-gastroenterology Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Yunhong Tian, Hai Ma, Yong Peng, Guanyin Li, Hongchun Yang
{"title":"Preventive effect of omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy against postoperative complications: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Yunhong Tian,&nbsp;Hai Ma,&nbsp;Yong Peng,&nbsp;Guanyin Li,&nbsp;Hongchun Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To systematically determine the effect of omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy against postoperative complication through metaanalysis of published studies.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Thorough literature search in Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify studies whether the use of Omental Flap to prevent postoperative complications. Review of 14 article candidates, identified 4 eligible articles with a total of 2971 patients for meta-analysis. Dichotomous data regarding distinction between omental roll-up and nonmental roll-up were pooled using random effects model to obtain the diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1129 patients in omental roll-up group, 1842 patients in nonomental group. Omental roll-up during pancreaticoduodenectomy could not prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR=0.81, 95%CI 0.40-1.63, P=0.56). it also could not prevent postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.28-1.59, P=0.37). We use the sensitivity analysis which found The pancreatic fistula was lower in the nonomental roll-up group than in the omental roll-up group (OR=1.24, 95%CI 1.03-1.50, P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of omental roll-up could not decrease the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to identify the effect of omental roll-up technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 137","pages":"187-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To systematically determine the effect of omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy against postoperative complication through metaanalysis of published studies.

Methodology: Thorough literature search in Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify studies whether the use of Omental Flap to prevent postoperative complications. Review of 14 article candidates, identified 4 eligible articles with a total of 2971 patients for meta-analysis. Dichotomous data regarding distinction between omental roll-up and nonmental roll-up were pooled using random effects model to obtain the diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: 1129 patients in omental roll-up group, 1842 patients in nonomental group. Omental roll-up during pancreaticoduodenectomy could not prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR=0.81, 95%CI 0.40-1.63, P=0.56). it also could not prevent postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.28-1.59, P=0.37). We use the sensitivity analysis which found The pancreatic fistula was lower in the nonomental roll-up group than in the omental roll-up group (OR=1.24, 95%CI 1.03-1.50, P=0.02).

Conclusions: The use of omental roll-up could not decrease the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to identify the effect of omental roll-up technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大网膜皮瓣预防胰十二指肠切除术术后并发症的meta分析。
背景/目的:通过对已发表研究的荟萃分析,系统地确定大网膜皮瓣在胰十二指肠切除术中对术后并发症的影响。方法:在Ovid-MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中进行全面的文献检索,以确定是否使用网膜瓣预防术后并发症的研究。回顾了14篇候选文献,选出4篇符合条件的文献,共2971例患者进行meta分析。采用随机效应模型对网膜卷缩和非网膜卷缩的二分类数据进行汇总,获得诊断优势比及其95%置信区间(ci)。结果:网膜卷起组1129例,网膜卷起组1842例。胰十二指肠切除术时大网膜卷起不能预防术后胰瘘(OR=0.81, 95%CI 0.40 ~ 1.63, P=0.56)。也不能预防术后腹腔出血(OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.28-1.59, P=0.37)。我们通过敏感性分析发现,无网膜卷取组胰瘘发生率低于网膜卷取组(OR=1.24, 95%CI 1.03-1.50, P=0.02)。结论:大网膜卷取不能降低胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘发生的风险。需要进一步的随机对照试验来确定网膜卷起技术在胰十二指肠切除术中的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepato-gastroenterology
Hepato-gastroenterology 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Hepato-Gastroenterology has been discontinued as of 2015. Extremely limited quantities of back issues in print available for sale.
期刊最新文献
Scheepswrak Oude Inschot, Hoppa III Hepatocellular carcinoma. Esophageal carcinoma. The Rule of Law, Economic Efficiency and Social Justice: A Primer for the President Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and survival
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1