Colon Cancer Staging in Vulnerable Older Adults: Adherence to National Guidelines and Impact on Survival.

Annals of hematology & oncology Pub Date : 2014-01-01
T B Leal, T Holden, L Cavalcante, G O Allen, J R Schumacher, M A Smith, J M Weiss, H B Neuman, N K LoConte
{"title":"Colon Cancer Staging in Vulnerable Older Adults: Adherence to National Guidelines and Impact on Survival.","authors":"T B Leal,&nbsp;T Holden,&nbsp;L Cavalcante,&nbsp;G O Allen,&nbsp;J R Schumacher,&nbsp;M A Smith,&nbsp;J M Weiss,&nbsp;H B Neuman,&nbsp;N K LoConte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is concern that elders are not adequately evaluated prior to colon cancer surgery. We sought to determine adherence with ACOVE-3 (Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders) quality indicators for pre-operative staging prior to colectomy for colon cancer utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (1992-2005).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We determined the proportion of patients aged 75 and older who had preoperative staging prior to colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma. Preoperative staging was defined as abdominopelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan (SCAN) and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy (SCOPE). Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of adherence. Odds ratios were adjusted for comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and disease severity. The association of adherence to ACOVE-3 and survival was quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 37,862 patients, the majority were 75-84 years, 28% of the patients were ≥85 years. Regarding preoperative staging in the 6-month interval prior to surgical resection, 8% had neither SCAN nor SCOPE, 6% had only SCAN, 43% had only SCOPE, and 43% had both SCAN and SCOPE. Compared to patients who were not staged, those evaluated with either SCOPE alone or SCAN plus SCOPE had lower odds of 3-year mortality. Patients who were staged with SCAN alone had an increased odds of death compared to those who had neither SCAN or SCOPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrate that the majority of vulnerable elders with colon cancer did not receive appropriate preoperative staging prior to resection. The findings also confirm that adherence to ACOVE-3 guidelines is associated with improved long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":72219,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hematology & oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405259/pdf/nihms647192.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hematology & oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is concern that elders are not adequately evaluated prior to colon cancer surgery. We sought to determine adherence with ACOVE-3 (Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders) quality indicators for pre-operative staging prior to colectomy for colon cancer utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (1992-2005).

Methods: We determined the proportion of patients aged 75 and older who had preoperative staging prior to colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma. Preoperative staging was defined as abdominopelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan (SCAN) and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy (SCOPE). Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of adherence. Odds ratios were adjusted for comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and disease severity. The association of adherence to ACOVE-3 and survival was quantified.

Results: Of the 37,862 patients, the majority were 75-84 years, 28% of the patients were ≥85 years. Regarding preoperative staging in the 6-month interval prior to surgical resection, 8% had neither SCAN nor SCOPE, 6% had only SCAN, 43% had only SCOPE, and 43% had both SCAN and SCOPE. Compared to patients who were not staged, those evaluated with either SCOPE alone or SCAN plus SCOPE had lower odds of 3-year mortality. Patients who were staged with SCAN alone had an increased odds of death compared to those who had neither SCAN or SCOPE.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the majority of vulnerable elders with colon cancer did not receive appropriate preoperative staging prior to resection. The findings also confirm that adherence to ACOVE-3 guidelines is associated with improved long-term survival.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
易受伤害的老年人结肠癌分期:遵守国家指南和对生存的影响。
背景:人们担心老年人在结肠癌手术前没有得到充分的评估。我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险关联数据库(1992-2005),试图确定ACOVE-3(弱势老年人护理评估)质量指标对结肠癌结肠切除术前术前分期的依从性。方法:我们确定了75岁及以上患者在结肠腺癌切除术前进行术前分期的比例。术前分期定义为腹腔计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像扫描(scan)和结肠镜检查或乙状结肠镜检查(SCOPE)。多变量逻辑回归确定了依从性的预测因素。根据合并症、社会经济地位和疾病严重程度调整优势比。量化acve -3依从性与生存的关系。结果:37862例患者中,75 ~ 84岁的患者居多,≥85岁的患者占28%。关于手术切除前6个月的术前分期,8%既没有SCAN也没有SCOPE, 6%只有SCAN, 43%只有SCOPE, 43%同时有SCAN和SCOPE。与未分期的患者相比,单独使用SCOPE或SCAN加SCOPE评估的患者3年死亡率较低。单独进行SCAN分期的患者与既不进行SCAN也不进行SCOPE分期的患者相比,死亡几率增加。结论:这些数据表明,大多数老年人易患结肠癌在切除前没有得到适当的术前分期。研究结果还证实,遵守ACOVE-3指南与改善长期生存有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MGMT Methylated High Grade Glioma with Distant Recurrence and Stable Original Tumor Site: Case Series. Isolated Bone Marrow Mastocytosis may be Associated with Reduced Overall Survival Combination Venetoclax and Rituximab: A Novel Approach to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage from Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome in the Setting of Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Basophils Unchained: A Rare Form of Leukemia Surge in Procalcitonin Levels Post ATG During Stem Cell Transplantation for Aplastic Anemia: A Diagnostic Dilemma with Sepsis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1