Anti-TNF-A therapy about infliximab and adalimamab for the effectiveness in ulcerative colitis compared with conventional therapy: a meta-analysis.

Hepato-gastroenterology Pub Date : 2015-03-01
Zheng Zhou, Cong Dai, Wei-Xin Liu
{"title":"Anti-TNF-A therapy about infliximab and adalimamab for the effectiveness in ulcerative colitis compared with conventional therapy: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Zheng Zhou,&nbsp;Cong Dai,&nbsp;Wei-Xin Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>TNF-α has an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). It seems that anti-TNF-α therapy is beneficial in the treatment of UC. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimamab with UC compared with conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab on UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response (RR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.50) of UC compared with conventional therapy, but those had not a statistically significant effects in clinical remission (RR = 1.63; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.18) and reduction of colectomy rate (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.12) of UC. And adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission (RR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.67) and clinical response (RR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.64) of UC compared with conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analyses suggested that Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy and adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission and clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"309-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: TNF-α has an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). It seems that anti-TNF-α therapy is beneficial in the treatment of UC. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimamab with UC compared with conventional therapy.

Methodology: The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab on UC.

Results: Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response (RR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.50) of UC compared with conventional therapy, but those had not a statistically significant effects in clinical remission (RR = 1.63; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.18) and reduction of colectomy rate (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.12) of UC. And adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission (RR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.67) and clinical response (RR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.64) of UC compared with conventional therapy.

Conclusion: Our meta-analyses suggested that Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy and adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission and clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英夫利昔单抗和阿达马单抗抗tnf -a治疗对溃疡性结肠炎的疗效与常规治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
背景/目的:TNF-α在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的发病机制中起重要作用。抗肿瘤坏死因子α治疗在UC的治疗中似乎是有益的。目的是评估英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗与常规治疗相比治疗UC的有效性。方法:检索Pubmed和Embase数据库,研究英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗对UC的疗效。结果:英夫利昔单抗诱导临床反应的效果有统计学意义(RR = 1.67;95% CI 1.12 ~ 2.50),但在临床缓解方面无统计学意义的影响(RR = 1.63;95% CI 0.84 ~ 3.18)和结肠切除术率降低(RR = 0.54;95% CI 0.26 ~ 1.12)。阿达木单抗在诱导临床缓解方面具有统计学意义(RR = 1.82;95% CI 1.24 ~ 2.67)和临床反应(RR = 1.36;与常规治疗相比,UC的95% CI为1.13至1.64。结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,与常规治疗相比,英夫利昔单抗在诱导UC临床反应方面具有统计学意义,阿达木单抗在诱导UC临床缓解和临床反应方面具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepato-gastroenterology
Hepato-gastroenterology 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Hepato-Gastroenterology has been discontinued as of 2015. Extremely limited quantities of back issues in print available for sale.
期刊最新文献
Scheepswrak Oude Inschot, Hoppa III Hepatocellular carcinoma. Esophageal carcinoma. The Rule of Law, Economic Efficiency and Social Justice: A Primer for the President Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and survival
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1