Comparison of visual function after multifocal and accommodative IOL implantation.

眼科学报 Pub Date : 2014-06-01

Weimin Tang, Shaoxiong Zhuang, Guoan Liu

{"title":"Comparison of visual function after multifocal and accommodative IOL implantation.","authors":"Weimin Tang, Shaoxiong Zhuang, Guoan Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare early visual function between patients undergoing phacoemulsification combined with multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.Methods: A total of 112 patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification in our hospital were recruited for this study and randomly assigned into multifocal (56 eyes; ZAM00 group) and accommodative (56 eyes; FLEX group) intraocular lens groups. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were statistically compared between the two groups.Results: No significant difference was found in uncorrected distant visual acuity between the ZMA00 and FLEX groups at 1 week, or 1, 3, and 6 months after operation (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 6 months, no statistical significance was noted in distant and intermediate best-corrected visual acuity or in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the ZMA00 group were superior to their counterparts in the FLEX group regarding near best corrected visual acuity, reading speed, and spectacle independence (all P < 0.05).Conclusion: ZMA00 and FLEX IOL implantation can provide excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity for patients with age-related cataract. ZMA00 IOL is superior to FLEX in terms of near visual acuity.","PeriodicalId":12096,"journal":{"name":"眼科学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare early visual function between patients undergoing phacoemulsification combined with multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.

Methods: A total of 112 patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification in our hospital were recruited for this study and randomly assigned into multifocal (56 eyes; ZAM00 group) and accommodative (56 eyes; FLEX group) intraocular lens groups. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results: No significant difference was found in uncorrected distant visual acuity between the ZMA00 and FLEX groups at 1 week, or 1, 3, and 6 months after operation (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 6 months, no statistical significance was noted in distant and intermediate best-corrected visual acuity or in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the ZMA00 group were superior to their counterparts in the FLEX group regarding near best corrected visual acuity, reading speed, and spectacle independence (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: ZMA00 and FLEX IOL implantation can provide excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity for patients with age-related cataract. ZMA00 IOL is superior to FLEX in terms of near visual acuity.

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

多焦与调节型人工晶体植入术后视功能的比较。

目的:比较超声乳化术联合多焦人工晶状体植入术与调节型人工晶状体植入术患者早期视功能的差异。方法:选取我院行年龄相关性白内障超声乳化术的112例患者作为研究对象，随机分为多焦组(56眼;ZAM00组)和调节组(56眼;FLEX组)人工晶体组。对两组患者的视敏度、对比敏感度进行统计学比较。结果:ZMA00组与FLEX组术后1周、1、3、6个月未矫正远视力差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后6个月，两组远、中最佳矫正视力及对比敏感度比较，差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。ZMA00组患者在近最佳矫正视力、阅读速度和眼镜独立性方面优于FLEX组(均P < 0.05)。结论:ZMA00联合FLEX人工晶状体植入术可为老年性白内障患者提供良好的远、中视力。ZMA00人工晶状体在近视力方面优于FLEX。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

眼科学报

自引率

0.00%

发文量

1312

期刊介绍： Eye science was founded in 1985. It is a national medical journal supervised by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University, and hosted by Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center (in October 2020, it was changed from a quarterly to a monthly, with the publication number: ISSN: 1000-4432; CN: 44-1119/R). It is edited by Ge Jian, former dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, Liu Yizhi, director and dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, and Lin Haotian, deputy director of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, as executive editor. It mainly reports on new developments and trends in the field of ophthalmology at home and abroad, focusing on basic research in ophthalmology, clinical experience, and theoretical knowledge and technical operations related to epidemiology. It has been included in important databases at home and abroad, such as Chemical Abstract (CA), China Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Core Journals (Selection) Database (Wanfang), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP).