Ratio of primary episcleral buckling surgery versus primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

眼科学报 Pub Date : 2014-03-01
Jost B Jonas, Barbara Mangler, Alexander Decker, Frank C Schlichtenbrede
{"title":"Ratio of primary episcleral buckling surgery versus primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.","authors":"Jost B Jonas,&nbsp;Barbara Mangler,&nbsp;Alexander Decker,&nbsp;Frank C Schlichtenbrede","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the ratio of the frequency of primary scleral buckling procedures versus the frequency of vitrectomies performed as treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in a primary retinal surgical department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments who underwent retinal or vitreoretinal surgery in the study period from 2002 to 2006. The size of the retinal defect and the amount of proliferative vitreoretinopathy were not exclusion criteria. Patients with tractional retinal detachment due to proliferative ischemic retinopathies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 875 primary retinal and vitreoretinal surgeries were performed on 875 eyes. Among the surgeries, episcleral sponges (42.9%) formed the largest part, followed by pars plana vitrectomies (35.0%) and encircling bands (22.2%). Combining episcleral sponges and encircling bands into an episcleral surgery group revealed that two thirds (65%) of the surgeries were episcleral interventions. In the episcleral sponge group, the retinal re-detachment rate after the first surgery was 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a university department as a primary referral unit for retinal detachments, episcleral retinal surgery can still outnumber vitreoretinal interventions, with retinal re-detachment rates which do not differ markedly from the re-detachment rates reported in randomized trials comparing vitreoretinal surgery with episcleral surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12096,"journal":{"name":"眼科学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the ratio of the frequency of primary scleral buckling procedures versus the frequency of vitrectomies performed as treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in a primary retinal surgical department.

Methods: The study included all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments who underwent retinal or vitreoretinal surgery in the study period from 2002 to 2006. The size of the retinal defect and the amount of proliferative vitreoretinopathy were not exclusion criteria. Patients with tractional retinal detachment due to proliferative ischemic retinopathies were excluded.

Results: In the study period, 875 primary retinal and vitreoretinal surgeries were performed on 875 eyes. Among the surgeries, episcleral sponges (42.9%) formed the largest part, followed by pars plana vitrectomies (35.0%) and encircling bands (22.2%). Combining episcleral sponges and encircling bands into an episcleral surgery group revealed that two thirds (65%) of the surgeries were episcleral interventions. In the episcleral sponge group, the retinal re-detachment rate after the first surgery was 13%.

Conclusion: In a university department as a primary referral unit for retinal detachments, episcleral retinal surgery can still outnumber vitreoretinal interventions, with retinal re-detachment rates which do not differ markedly from the re-detachment rates reported in randomized trials comparing vitreoretinal surgery with episcleral surgery.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初次巩膜外扣合手术与初次玻璃体切除术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的比较。
目的:评估原发性巩膜扣带手术的频率与玻璃体切除术的频率在原发性视网膜外科治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的比例。方法:本研究纳入2002 - 2006年间所有接受视网膜或玻璃体视网膜手术的孔源性视网膜脱离患者。视网膜缺损的大小和增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变的数量不是排除标准。排除因增殖性缺血性视网膜病变引起的牵引性视网膜脱离患者。结果:本研究期间共875只眼进行了原发性视网膜和玻璃体视网膜手术。其中以巩膜外海绵手术最多(42.9%),其次为玻璃体切割手术(35.0%)和环抱带手术(22.2%)。将外膜海绵和环抱带合并为外膜手术组,发现三分之二(65%)的手术是外膜干预。巩膜外海绵组首次手术后视网膜再脱离率为13%。结论:在一个大学院系作为视网膜脱离的主要转诊单位,膜外视网膜手术仍然可以超过玻璃体视网膜干预,视网膜再脱离率与玻璃体视网膜手术和膜外手术比较的随机试验报告的再脱离率没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1312
期刊介绍: Eye science was founded in 1985. It is a national medical journal supervised by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University, and hosted by Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center (in October 2020, it was changed from a quarterly to a monthly, with the publication number: ISSN: 1000-4432; CN: 44-1119/R). It is edited by Ge Jian, former dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, Liu Yizhi, director and dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, and Lin Haotian, deputy director of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, as executive editor. It mainly reports on new developments and trends in the field of ophthalmology at home and abroad, focusing on basic research in ophthalmology, clinical experience, and theoretical knowledge and technical operations related to epidemiology. It has been included in important databases at home and abroad, such as Chemical Abstract (CA), China Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Core Journals (Selection) Database (Wanfang), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP).
期刊最新文献
Uveitis secondary to cancer therapeutics Optical coherence tomography angiography of non-exudative choroidal neovascularization. Application of visual electrophysiology for the diagnosis and treatment of cataracts. Intravitreal aflibercept for rubeosis iridis secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Approved pharmacotherapy for myopic choroidal neovascularization: a review of randomized controlled trials in ranibizumab and aflibercept.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1