An appropriate compression pace is important for securing the quality of hands-only CPR--a manikin study.

Q4 Medicine Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2014-09-01
Yoshitaka Shimizu, Koichi Tanigawa, Masami Ishikawa, Kazuhisa Ouhara, Kana Oue, Taiga Yoshinaka, Hidemi Kurihara, Masahiro Irifune
{"title":"An appropriate compression pace is important for securing the quality of hands-only CPR--a manikin study.","authors":"Yoshitaka Shimizu,&nbsp;Koichi Tanigawa,&nbsp;Masami Ishikawa,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Ouhara,&nbsp;Kana Oue,&nbsp;Taiga Yoshinaka,&nbsp;Hidemi Kurihara,&nbsp;Masahiro Irifune","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is important to implement good quality chest compressions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This manikin study examined the effects of different compression rates on chest compression depth variables using a metronome sound guide. Fifty sixth-year dentistry students participated in the study. Each participant performed CPR at 3 different compression rates, 110, 100, and 90 compressions per min (pace-110-g, pace-100-g, and pace-90-g) for 2 consecutive one-minute sets with a ten-second break between the sets. The percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm at pace-110-g decreased significantly from 22.1 ± 4.7% in the first set to 16.7 ± 4.4%* in the second set (*p < 0.05 vs. the first set). However, no significant differences were observed between the first and second sets at pace-100-g and pace-90-g. The results obtained for pace-110-g were compared in detail by gender. In the male group, the percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm was 43.5 ± 7.5% in the first set, and this decreased significantly to 34.6 ± 7.6%* in the second set (*p < 0.001 vs. the first set). However, the percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm in the female group was 2.3 ± 1.6%* in the first set and 0.2 ± 0.2%* in the second set (*p < 0.05 vs. male). Our study demonstrated that the compression pace of 110 compressions per min was inadequate to provide chest compressions of an appropriate depth, which decreased rapidly. Therefore, limiting the rate of compressions to within a certain number per min may contribute to minimizing deteriorations in compression depth in hands-only CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12860,"journal":{"name":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","volume":"63 1-3","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is important to implement good quality chest compressions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This manikin study examined the effects of different compression rates on chest compression depth variables using a metronome sound guide. Fifty sixth-year dentistry students participated in the study. Each participant performed CPR at 3 different compression rates, 110, 100, and 90 compressions per min (pace-110-g, pace-100-g, and pace-90-g) for 2 consecutive one-minute sets with a ten-second break between the sets. The percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm at pace-110-g decreased significantly from 22.1 ± 4.7% in the first set to 16.7 ± 4.4%* in the second set (*p < 0.05 vs. the first set). However, no significant differences were observed between the first and second sets at pace-100-g and pace-90-g. The results obtained for pace-110-g were compared in detail by gender. In the male group, the percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm was 43.5 ± 7.5% in the first set, and this decreased significantly to 34.6 ± 7.6%* in the second set (*p < 0.001 vs. the first set). However, the percentage of compressions deeper than 5 cm in the female group was 2.3 ± 1.6%* in the first set and 0.2 ± 0.2%* in the second set (*p < 0.05 vs. male). Our study demonstrated that the compression pace of 110 compressions per min was inadequate to provide chest compressions of an appropriate depth, which decreased rapidly. Therefore, limiting the rate of compressions to within a certain number per min may contribute to minimizing deteriorations in compression depth in hands-only CPR.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项人体研究表明,适当的按压速度对于确保徒手心肺复苏的质量非常重要。
实施高质量的胸部按压对心肺复苏(CPR)至关重要。这个人体研究检查了不同的压缩率对胸部压缩深度变量使用节拍器声音引导的影响。56名六年级牙科专业的学生参与了这项研究。每个参与者以3种不同的按压率,每分钟110次、100次和90次按压(速度-110克、速度-100克和速度-90克)进行心肺复苏术,连续两组,每组之间休息10秒。在速度-110-g时,深度大于5 cm的按压比例从第一组的22.1±4.7%显著下降到第二组的16.7±4.4%* (*p < 0.05)。然而,第一组和第二组在100-g和90-g时没有观察到显著差异。对pace-110-g的结果进行了详细的性别比较。在男性组中,第一组按压深度超过5 cm的比例为43.5±7.5%,第二组明显下降至34.6±7.6%* (*p < 0.001)。而女性组第一组按压深度大于5cm的比例为2.3±1.6%*,第二组为0.2±0.2%* (*p < 0.05)。我们的研究表明,每分钟110次的按压速度不足以提供适当深度的胸部按压,并迅速下降。因此,将按压频率限制在每分钟一定次数内可能有助于减少徒手CPR按压深度的恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Establishment of an antiemetic protocol for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting evaluated using the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool in colorectal cancer Low lung diffusing capacity is associated with high cardio-ankle vascular index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Primary retroperitoneal cyst in pregnancy: A case report based on immunohistochemical analysis and literature review Incidentally found abdominal para-aortic and inferior mesenteric root lymph node metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma in a surgical case with sigmoid colon cancer Novel Oral Derivative UD-017, a Highly Selective CDK7 Inhibitor, Exhibits Anticancer Activity by Inducing Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Human Colorectal Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1