THE IMPACT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE VS. LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Jahan Porhomayon, Sina Davari Farid, Ali A El-Solh, Ghazaleh Adlparvar, Nader D Nader
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE VS. LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.","authors":"Jahan Porhomayon,&nbsp;Sina Davari Farid,&nbsp;Ali A El-Solh,&nbsp;Ghazaleh Adlparvar,&nbsp;Nader D Nader","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of Endotracheal tube (ETT) vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key words searching from databases such as Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library provided 14 studies focusing on the use of EET vs. LMA for general anesthesia. Pooled estimate of relative risk with 95% confidence interval using random effect model was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 studies were selected for meta-analysis with a total of 1866 patients. 9 studies focused on the outcome of PONV in adult patients. It showed incidence of PONV with of LMA and ETT in adult of about 204/690 (30%) and 145/725 (20%) respectively with [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% CI, 0.76-3.75, P = 0.20]. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 87%). Five studies focused on the outcome of PONV in pediatric patients with PONV in LMA and ETT group of 85/229 (37%) and 72/222 (32%) respectively with (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 0.61-2.76, P = 0.50). Heterogeneity was moderate at (I2 = 53%). When all patients were combined heterogeneity was high at 81% with OR = 1.56, 95% CI, 0.87-2.79, P = 0.14.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk of PONV shows an increase trend toward the use of LMA. Larger randomized trials are needed to assess the impact of airway devices on PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of Endotracheal tube (ETT) vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia.

Methods: Key words searching from databases such as Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library provided 14 studies focusing on the use of EET vs. LMA for general anesthesia. Pooled estimate of relative risk with 95% confidence interval using random effect model was conducted.

Results: 14 studies were selected for meta-analysis with a total of 1866 patients. 9 studies focused on the outcome of PONV in adult patients. It showed incidence of PONV with of LMA and ETT in adult of about 204/690 (30%) and 145/725 (20%) respectively with [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% CI, 0.76-3.75, P = 0.20]. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 87%). Five studies focused on the outcome of PONV in pediatric patients with PONV in LMA and ETT group of 85/229 (37%) and 72/222 (32%) respectively with (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 0.61-2.76, P = 0.50). Heterogeneity was moderate at (I2 = 53%). When all patients were combined heterogeneity was high at 81% with OR = 1.56, 95% CI, 0.87-2.79, P = 0.14.

Conclusion: Risk of PONV shows an increase trend toward the use of LMA. Larger randomized trials are needed to assess the impact of airway devices on PONV.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气管插管与喉罩通气对术后恶心呕吐发生率的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨气管插管(ETT)与喉罩气道(LMA)对全麻手术患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。方法:从Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等数据库中检索关键词,提供了14项研究,重点是EET与LMA在全麻中的应用。使用随机效应模型对95%置信区间的相对风险进行了汇总估计。结果:选择了14项研究进行荟萃分析,共有1866名患者。9项研究集中于成人患者PONV的结果。LMA和ETT的PONV在成人中的发生率分别为204/690(30%)和145/725(20%),[比值比(OR)=1.69,95%CI,0.76-3.75,P=0.20]。五项研究集中于LMA和ETT组儿童PONV患者的PONV结果,分别为85/229(37%)和72/222(32%),(OR=1.30,95%CI,0.61-2.76,P=0.50)。异质性中等(I2=53%)。当所有患者合并时,异质性高达81%,OR=1.56,95%CI,0.87-2.79,P=0.014。结论:随着LMA的使用,PONV的风险呈增加趋势。需要进行更大规模的随机试验来评估气道装置对PONV的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Amniotic fluid embolism. THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN MODERATE TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CONTROLLED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Dose-Dependent Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Ketamine in Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Effects of Circuit Leak Development Over Time and Response During Low-Flow Volume and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation. Post-Partum Malignant Hypertension in a Patient with Preeclampsia and Abruptio Placenta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1