Decreased Hospital Length of Stay for ICH and PE after Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Radiological Worklist Triage System.

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-08-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2141839
Michael Petry, Charlotte Lansky, Yosef Chodakiewitz, Marcel Maya, Barry Pressman
{"title":"Decreased Hospital Length of Stay for ICH and PE after Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Radiological Worklist Triage System.","authors":"Michael Petry,&nbsp;Charlotte Lansky,&nbsp;Yosef Chodakiewitz,&nbsp;Marcel Maya,&nbsp;Barry Pressman","doi":"10.1155/2022/2141839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in the length of stay (LOS) for inpatients diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or pulmonary embolism (PE) prior to and following implementation of an (AI) triage software. A retrospective review was performed for patients that underwent CT imaging procedures related to ICH and PE from April 2016 to October 2019. All patient encounters that included noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) or CT chest angiogram (CTCA) procedures, identified by the DICOM study descriptions, from April 2016 to April 2019 were included for ICH and PE, respectively. All patients that were diagnosed with ICH or PE were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes. Three separate control groups were defined as follows: (i) all remaining patients that underwent the designated imaging studies, (ii) patients diagnosed with hip fractures, and (iii) all hospital wide encounters, during the study period. Pre-AI and post-AI time periods were defined around the deployment dates of the ICH and PE modules, respectively. The reduction in LOS was 1.30 days (95% C.I. 0.1-2.5), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 11.9% (<i>p</i> value = 0.032), for ICH and 2.07 days (95% C.I. 0.1-4.0), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 26.3% (<i>p</i> value = 0.034), for PE when comparing the pre-AI and post-AI time periods. Reductions in LOS were observed in the ICH pre-AI and post-AI time period group for patients that were not diagnosed with ICH, but that underwent related imaging, 0.46 days (95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 5% (<i>p</i> value = 0.018), and inpatients that were diagnosed with hip fractures, 0.60 days (95% C.I. 0.1-1.2) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 8.3% (<i>p</i> value = 0.004). No other significant decrease in length of stay was observed in any of the other patient groups. The introduction of computer-aided triage and prioritization software into the radiological workflow was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay for patients diagnosed with ICH and PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411003/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2141839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in the length of stay (LOS) for inpatients diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or pulmonary embolism (PE) prior to and following implementation of an (AI) triage software. A retrospective review was performed for patients that underwent CT imaging procedures related to ICH and PE from April 2016 to October 2019. All patient encounters that included noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) or CT chest angiogram (CTCA) procedures, identified by the DICOM study descriptions, from April 2016 to April 2019 were included for ICH and PE, respectively. All patients that were diagnosed with ICH or PE were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes. Three separate control groups were defined as follows: (i) all remaining patients that underwent the designated imaging studies, (ii) patients diagnosed with hip fractures, and (iii) all hospital wide encounters, during the study period. Pre-AI and post-AI time periods were defined around the deployment dates of the ICH and PE modules, respectively. The reduction in LOS was 1.30 days (95% C.I. 0.1-2.5), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 11.9% (p value = 0.032), for ICH and 2.07 days (95% C.I. 0.1-4.0), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 26.3% (p value = 0.034), for PE when comparing the pre-AI and post-AI time periods. Reductions in LOS were observed in the ICH pre-AI and post-AI time period group for patients that were not diagnosed with ICH, but that underwent related imaging, 0.46 days (95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 5% (p value = 0.018), and inpatients that were diagnosed with hip fractures, 0.60 days (95% C.I. 0.1-1.2) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 8.3% (p value = 0.004). No other significant decrease in length of stay was observed in any of the other patient groups. The introduction of computer-aided triage and prioritization software into the radiological workflow was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay for patients diagnosed with ICH and PE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用人工智能增强放射工作表分诊系统后,脑出血和肺水肿住院时间缩短。
该研究的目的是确定在实施(AI)分诊软件之前和之后,诊断为颅内出血(ICH)或肺栓塞(PE)的住院患者的住院时间(LOS)是否有差异。回顾性分析了2016年4月至2019年10月期间接受脑出血和肺栓塞相关CT成像手术的患者。2016年4月至2019年4月,DICOM研究描述确定的所有患者就诊包括非对比头部计算机断层扫描(CT)或CT胸部血管造影(CTCA)程序,分别用于ICH和PE。所有诊断为脑出血或PE的患者均使用ICD9和ICD10代码进行鉴定。三个独立的对照组定义如下:(i)在研究期间接受指定影像学检查的所有剩余患者,(ii)诊断为髋部骨折的患者,以及(iii)所有医院范围内的接触。人工智能前和人工智能后的时间段分别围绕ICH和PE模块的部署日期进行定义。与ai前和ai后相比,ICH和PE的LOS减少了1.30天(95% ci . 0.1-2.5),导致观察到的百分比下降11.9% (p值= 0.032),而PE的LOS减少了2.07天(95% ci . 0.1-4.0),导致观察到的百分比下降26.3% (p值= 0.034)。未诊断为脑出血,但接受相关影像学检查的脑出血患者,在脑出血前和脑出血后时间段组,LOS下降0.46天(95% ci . 0.1-0.8),观察百分比下降5% (p值= 0.018),诊断为髋部骨折的住院患者,0.60天(95% ci . 0.1-1.2),观察百分比下降8.3% (p值= 0.004)。在其他患者组中,没有观察到住院时间的其他显著减少。在放射工作流程中引入计算机辅助分类和优先排序软件与诊断为ICH和PE的患者住院时间的显着减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Comparison between Diabetes and Nondiabetes Subjects, and Correlation with Serum Vitamin D. Orthopantomography Detection of Atheroma Plaques and Its Relationship with Periodontal Disease and Missing Teeth. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccine Availability on Utilization of Breast Imaging in a Multistate Radiology Practice Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccine Availability on Utilization of Breast Imaging in a Multistate Radiology Practice The Application of Advanced Bone Imaging Technologies in Sports Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1