Development and Validation of Biosafety Climate Scale for Biological and Biomedical Science Laboratories in the United States.

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Applied Biosafety Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1089/apb.2021.0006
Sivarchana Mareedu-Boada, Torsten Alwin Hopp, Riten Mitra
{"title":"Development and Validation of Biosafety Climate Scale for Biological and Biomedical Science Laboratories in the United States.","authors":"Sivarchana Mareedu-Boada,&nbsp;Torsten Alwin Hopp,&nbsp;Riten Mitra","doi":"10.1089/apb.2021.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Industry-specific safety climate scales that measure safety status have been published, however, nothing specific to biological laboratories has ever been established. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to develop and validate a biosafety climate (BSCL) scale unique for research professionals (RPs) and biosafety professionals (BPs) at teaching and research biological laboratories affiliated to public universities in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> BSCL scale was developed from literature review. In study 1, 15-item biosafety climate (BSCL-15) scale with 15 items and 5 factors was pretested with <i>n</i> = 9 RPs and <i>n</i> = 7 BPs to perform reliability, content, and face validity analyses. In study 2, revised 17-item biosafety climate (BSCL-17) scale with 17 items and 5 factors was pilot tested with <i>n</i> = 91 RPs and <i>n</i> = 88 BPs. Correlation tests, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin, Bartlett's test of sphericity, Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to validate the BSCL-17 scale. <b>Results:</b> EFA resulted in a 3-factor 17-item BSCL scale for both RPs and BPs. Internal consistency of the scale was > 0.8 for the BSCL scale and the underlying three factors, indicating high reliability. The factors identified for RPs are 1) management priority, communication and participation, 2) group norms, and 3) supervisor commitment. The factors identified for BPs are 1) management priority and communication, 2) group norms and participation, and 3) supervisor commitment. <b>Discussion:</b> A valid and reliable BSCL scale to measure safety climate and quantify safety culture in biological laboratories has been presented. It can be used as a key performance indicator and aid in targeted interventions as part of process improvement of biological safety programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"26 4","pages":"221-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134341/pdf/apb.2021.0006.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2021.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Industry-specific safety climate scales that measure safety status have been published, however, nothing specific to biological laboratories has ever been established. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a biosafety climate (BSCL) scale unique for research professionals (RPs) and biosafety professionals (BPs) at teaching and research biological laboratories affiliated to public universities in the United States. Methods: BSCL scale was developed from literature review. In study 1, 15-item biosafety climate (BSCL-15) scale with 15 items and 5 factors was pretested with n = 9 RPs and n = 7 BPs to perform reliability, content, and face validity analyses. In study 2, revised 17-item biosafety climate (BSCL-17) scale with 17 items and 5 factors was pilot tested with n = 91 RPs and n = 88 BPs. Correlation tests, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin, Bartlett's test of sphericity, Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to validate the BSCL-17 scale. Results: EFA resulted in a 3-factor 17-item BSCL scale for both RPs and BPs. Internal consistency of the scale was > 0.8 for the BSCL scale and the underlying three factors, indicating high reliability. The factors identified for RPs are 1) management priority, communication and participation, 2) group norms, and 3) supervisor commitment. The factors identified for BPs are 1) management priority and communication, 2) group norms and participation, and 3) supervisor commitment. Discussion: A valid and reliable BSCL scale to measure safety climate and quantify safety culture in biological laboratories has been presented. It can be used as a key performance indicator and aid in targeted interventions as part of process improvement of biological safety programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国生物和生物医学科学实验室生物安全气候量表的开发与验证。
导言:衡量安全状况的行业特定安全气候尺度已经公布,然而,没有任何针对生物实验室的特定气候尺度。目的:本研究旨在为美国公立大学附属生物实验室的研究人员(RPs)和生物安全专业人员(bp)开发和验证一种生物安全气候(BSCL)量表。方法:参考文献编制BSCL量表。研究1采用15题5因子的生物安全气候(BSCL-15)量表,采用n = 9个rp和n = 7个bp进行信度、内容和面效度分析。研究2采用修订的17项生物安全气候(BSCL-17)量表,采用17项5个因子,共91个rp和88个bp进行中试。采用相关检验、Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin、Bartlett's球形检验、Cronbach's alpha和探索性因子分析(EFA)对BSCL-17量表进行验证。结果:EFA对RPs和bp均产生了3因子17项的BSCL量表。BSCL量表与基础三因子的内部一致性> 0.8,信度较高。rp的因素包括:1)管理优先级、沟通和参与;2)群体规范;3)主管承诺。为bp确定的因素有:1)管理优先权和沟通;2)群体规范和参与;3)主管承诺。讨论:提出了一种有效可靠的BSCL量表,用于测量生物实验室的安全气候和量化安全文化。它可以用作关键绩效指标,并作为生物安全计划过程改进的一部分,帮助进行有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
期刊最新文献
Decontamination Validation of the BSL-4 Chemical Disinfectant Deluge Shower System. Call for Volume 30 (2025) Special Issue Papers: Biosafety and Biosecurity for Potential Pandemic Pathogens and Dual-Use Research of Concern: Deadline for Manuscript Submission: October 31, 2024. Safeguarding Mail-Order DNA Synthesis in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Frequency of Leaks from Conical Centrifuge Tubes Boundary Integrity Testing of Containment Level 3 (Biological Safety Level 3) Laboratories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1