Attitudes and perceptions about the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics among behavioral health practitioners.

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2022-08-23 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2022.08.232
Shaina Schwartz, Christina Carilli, Taimur Mian, Laura Ruekert, Archana Kumar
{"title":"Attitudes and perceptions about the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics among behavioral health practitioners.","authors":"Shaina Schwartz,&nbsp;Christina Carilli,&nbsp;Taimur Mian,&nbsp;Laura Ruekert,&nbsp;Archana Kumar","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2022.08.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-As) are important tools for the treatment of schizophrenia, yet they appear to be underutilized. This study will assess practitioner perceptions of LAI-As to elucidate reasons for underuse and uncover new avenues to increase appropriate use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous electronic survey was developed and actively distributed to behavioral health care practitioners (MD, DO, PA, NP, PharmD, RN, LCSW). Independent <i>t</i> testing and linear regression analysis was used to assess for interactions between survey responses and individual factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 survey responses were collected from September 3, 2020 to March 17, 2021. On average, participants thought that LAI-As were slightly underutilized in practice. The mean estimated patient acceptance rate for LAI-A therapy was 38.6% ± 29.5% (range = 0%-100%). Participants who were <40 years of age and those with a psychiatric pharmacist at their practice site had significantly higher estimated acceptance rates. The highest-rated barriers to LAI-A use were related to negative patient attitudes, lack of patient education, and access issues (eg, transportation, cost). Respondent characteristics including age, gender identity, geographic location, practice setting, and the presence of a psychiatric pharmacist significantly influenced the perceived impact of these barriers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Behavioral health practitioners generally believed that LAI-As were underused, and only one-third of their patients would be accepting of the therapy. Several barriers were perceived as frequently impacting LAI-A use, but these were reduced by the presence of a psychiatric pharmacist. Understanding practitioner perceptions can assist with increasing the use of LAI-As.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"12 4","pages":"232-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/41/i2168-9709-12-4-232.PMC9405628.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2022.08.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-As) are important tools for the treatment of schizophrenia, yet they appear to be underutilized. This study will assess practitioner perceptions of LAI-As to elucidate reasons for underuse and uncover new avenues to increase appropriate use.

Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was developed and actively distributed to behavioral health care practitioners (MD, DO, PA, NP, PharmD, RN, LCSW). Independent t testing and linear regression analysis was used to assess for interactions between survey responses and individual factors.

Results: A total of 146 survey responses were collected from September 3, 2020 to March 17, 2021. On average, participants thought that LAI-As were slightly underutilized in practice. The mean estimated patient acceptance rate for LAI-A therapy was 38.6% ± 29.5% (range = 0%-100%). Participants who were <40 years of age and those with a psychiatric pharmacist at their practice site had significantly higher estimated acceptance rates. The highest-rated barriers to LAI-A use were related to negative patient attitudes, lack of patient education, and access issues (eg, transportation, cost). Respondent characteristics including age, gender identity, geographic location, practice setting, and the presence of a psychiatric pharmacist significantly influenced the perceived impact of these barriers.

Discussion: Behavioral health practitioners generally believed that LAI-As were underused, and only one-third of their patients would be accepting of the therapy. Several barriers were perceived as frequently impacting LAI-A use, but these were reduced by the presence of a psychiatric pharmacist. Understanding practitioner perceptions can assist with increasing the use of LAI-As.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为健康从业人员对使用长效注射抗精神病药物的态度和看法。
长效注射抗精神病药物(LAI-As)是治疗精神分裂症的重要工具,但它们似乎没有得到充分利用。本研究将评估从业者对ai - as的看法,以阐明使用不足的原因,并发现增加适当使用的新途径。方法:进行匿名电子问卷调查,并积极分发给行为卫生保健从业人员(MD、DO、PA、NP、PharmD、RN、LCSW)。采用独立t检验和线性回归分析来评估调查结果与个体因素之间的相互作用。结果:从2020年9月3日至2021年3月17日,共收集了146份调查问卷。平均而言,参与者认为ai在实践中没有得到充分利用。估计患者对LAI-A治疗的平均接受率为38.6%±29.5%(范围= 0%-100%)。讨论的参与者:行为健康从业者普遍认为人工智能治疗没有得到充分利用,只有三分之一的患者会接受这种治疗。一些障碍被认为经常影响LAI-A的使用,但这些障碍由于精神科药剂师的存在而减少。了解从业者的看法可以帮助增加ai - as的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports Intranasal ketamine as a treatment for psychiatric complications of long COVID: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1