Large mammal telomere length variation across ecoregions.

Christian Fohringer, Franz Hoelzl, Andrew M Allen, Claire Cayol, Göran Ericsson, Göran Spong, Steven Smith, Navinder J Singh
{"title":"Large mammal telomere length variation across ecoregions.","authors":"Christian Fohringer,&nbsp;Franz Hoelzl,&nbsp;Andrew M Allen,&nbsp;Claire Cayol,&nbsp;Göran Ericsson,&nbsp;Göran Spong,&nbsp;Steven Smith,&nbsp;Navinder J Singh","doi":"10.1186/s12862-022-02050-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telomere length provides a physiological proxy for accumulated stress in animals. While there is a growing consensus over how telomere dynamics and their patterns are linked to life history variation and individual experience, knowledge on the impact of exposure to different stressors at a large spatial scale on telomere length is still lacking. How exposure to different stressors at a regional scale interacts with individual differences in life history is also poorly understood. To better understand large-scale regional influences, we investigated telomere length variation in moose (Alces alces) distributed across three ecoregions. We analyzed 153 samples of 106 moose representing moose of both sexes and range of ages to measure relative telomere lengths (RTL) in white blood cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that average RTL was significantly shorter in a northern (montane) and southern (sarmatic) ecoregion where moose experience chronic stress related to severe summer and winter temperatures as well as high anthropogenic land-use compared to the boreal region. Our study suggests that animals in the northern boreal forests, with relatively homogenous land use, are less disturbed by environmental and anthropogenic stressors. In contrast, animals in areas experiencing a higher rate of anthropogenic and environmental change experience increased stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although animals can often adapt to predictable stressors, our data suggest that some environmental conditions, even though predictable and ubiquitous, can generate population level differences of long-term stress. By measuring RTL in moose for the first time, we provide valuable insights towards our current understanding of telomere biology in free-ranging wildlife in human-modified ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9127,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426267/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02050-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Telomere length provides a physiological proxy for accumulated stress in animals. While there is a growing consensus over how telomere dynamics and their patterns are linked to life history variation and individual experience, knowledge on the impact of exposure to different stressors at a large spatial scale on telomere length is still lacking. How exposure to different stressors at a regional scale interacts with individual differences in life history is also poorly understood. To better understand large-scale regional influences, we investigated telomere length variation in moose (Alces alces) distributed across three ecoregions. We analyzed 153 samples of 106 moose representing moose of both sexes and range of ages to measure relative telomere lengths (RTL) in white blood cells.

Results: We found that average RTL was significantly shorter in a northern (montane) and southern (sarmatic) ecoregion where moose experience chronic stress related to severe summer and winter temperatures as well as high anthropogenic land-use compared to the boreal region. Our study suggests that animals in the northern boreal forests, with relatively homogenous land use, are less disturbed by environmental and anthropogenic stressors. In contrast, animals in areas experiencing a higher rate of anthropogenic and environmental change experience increased stress.

Conclusion: Although animals can often adapt to predictable stressors, our data suggest that some environmental conditions, even though predictable and ubiquitous, can generate population level differences of long-term stress. By measuring RTL in moose for the first time, we provide valuable insights towards our current understanding of telomere biology in free-ranging wildlife in human-modified ecosystems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨生态区域的大型哺乳动物端粒长度变化。
背景:端粒长度是动物累积应激的生理指标。虽然端粒动力学及其模式如何与生命史变化和个体经验联系在一起已成为越来越多的共识,但在大空间尺度上暴露于不同压力源对端粒长度的影响的知识仍然缺乏。在区域尺度上暴露于不同的压力源如何与生命史上的个体差异相互作用,人们也知之甚少。为了更好地了解大规模的区域影响,我们研究了分布在三个生态区的驼鹿(Alces Alces)的端粒长度变化。我们分析了106头驼鹿的153个样本,代表了不同性别和年龄范围的驼鹿,以测量白细胞中的相对端粒长度(RTL)。结果:我们发现,与北方地区相比,北部(山地)和南部(萨尔马)生态区的平均RTL显著缩短,在这些生态区,驼鹿经历了与夏季和冬季高温以及高度人为土地利用相关的慢性应激。我们的研究表明,在土地利用相对均匀的北方寒带森林中,动物受到环境和人为压力源的干扰较小。相比之下,在人类活动和环境变化率较高的地区,动物承受的压力更大。结论:虽然动物通常可以适应可预测的压力源,但我们的数据表明,一些环境条件,即使是可预测的和普遍存在的,也会产生长期压力的种群水平差异。通过首次测量驼鹿的RTL,我们为我们目前对人类改造生态系统中自由放养野生动物端粒生物学的理解提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genomics of hybrid parallel origin in Aquilegia ecalcarata Resolving the phylogeny of Thladiantha (Cucurbitaceae) with three different target capture pipelines Peripatric speciation within Torreya fargesii (Taxaceae) in the Hengduan Mountains inferred from multi-loci phylogeography Ecosystem restoration, regeneration and rewilding. Native amphibian toxin reduces invasive crayfish feeding with potential benefits to stream biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1