The Implementation of Assisted Dying in Quebec and Interdisciplinary Support Groups: What Role for Ethics?

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Hec Forum Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1007/s10730-022-09484-w
Marie-Eve Bouthillier, Catherine Perron, Delphine Roigt, Jean-Simon Fortin, Michelle Pimont
{"title":"The Implementation of Assisted Dying in Quebec and Interdisciplinary Support Groups: What Role for Ethics?","authors":"Marie-Eve Bouthillier,&nbsp;Catherine Perron,&nbsp;Delphine Roigt,&nbsp;Jean-Simon Fortin,&nbsp;Michelle Pimont","doi":"10.1007/s10730-022-09484-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this text is to tell the story of the implementation of the Act Respecting End-of-Life Care, referred to hereafter as Law 2 (Gouvernement du Québec, 2014) with an emphasis on the ambiguous role of ethics in the Interdisciplinary Support Groups (ISGs), created by Quebec's Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux (MSSS). As established, ISGs provide \"clinical, administrative and ethical support to health care professionals responding to a request for Medical aid in dying (MAiD)\" (Gouvernement du Québec, 2015). It is suggested that their composition includes the participation of a person with an expertise in ethics. These ISGs represent an important innovation for stakeholders involved in MAiD. To date, no scientific research has specifically addressed ISGs and little research has been conducted in other jurisdictions on the roles, operations and practices of MAiD support structures, especially the implication of ethics. Several ISGs have certainly developed promising practices that could benefit all stakeholders in the wider field of ethics and end of life. We will explore the development of ISGs in Quebec as a support structure for MAiD by highlighting the role that ethics has played (and should play) in these morally and humanly challenging situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09484-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this text is to tell the story of the implementation of the Act Respecting End-of-Life Care, referred to hereafter as Law 2 (Gouvernement du Québec, 2014) with an emphasis on the ambiguous role of ethics in the Interdisciplinary Support Groups (ISGs), created by Quebec's Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux (MSSS). As established, ISGs provide "clinical, administrative and ethical support to health care professionals responding to a request for Medical aid in dying (MAiD)" (Gouvernement du Québec, 2015). It is suggested that their composition includes the participation of a person with an expertise in ethics. These ISGs represent an important innovation for stakeholders involved in MAiD. To date, no scientific research has specifically addressed ISGs and little research has been conducted in other jurisdictions on the roles, operations and practices of MAiD support structures, especially the implication of ethics. Several ISGs have certainly developed promising practices that could benefit all stakeholders in the wider field of ethics and end of life. We will explore the development of ISGs in Quebec as a support structure for MAiD by highlighting the role that ethics has played (and should play) in these morally and humanly challenging situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协助死亡在魁北克和跨学科支持小组的实施:伦理的作用是什么?
本文的目的是讲述《尊重临终关怀法案》的实施情况,下文称为第2号法律(government du quemacei, 2014),重点是伦理在跨学科支持小组(isg)中的模糊作用,由魁北克的社会服务部门(MSSS)创建。按照规定,isg向"响应临终医疗援助请求的保健专业人员提供临床、行政和道德支持"。(中国政府,2015)。建议他们的组成包括一个具有道德专业知识的人的参与。这些isg代表了参与MAiD的利益相关者的重要创新。到目前为止,还没有科学研究专门针对国际咨询组,在其他司法管辖区也很少对国际咨询组支助结构的作用、业务和做法进行研究,特别是对伦理的影响。一些isg当然已经开发出有前途的做法,可以使更广泛的道德和生命终结领域的所有利益攸关方受益。我们将通过强调道德在这些具有道德和人性挑战性的情况下所发挥的作用(以及应该发挥的作用),探索魁北克isg作为MAiD支持结构的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
期刊最新文献
Positioning Ethics When Direct Patient Care is Prioritized: Experiences from Implementing Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Childhood Cancer Care. An Ethics Consult Documentation Simplification Project: Summation of Participatory Processes, User Perceptions, and Subsequent Use Patterns. Survey of Moral Distress and Self-Awareness among Health Care Professionals. The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns. Correction to: Evaluation of Interventions to Address Moral Distress: A Multi-method Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1