Should a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection be considered a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.24875/ACM.22000153
Kietseé A Díaz-Domínguez, Andrés Cruz-Melendez, Luis M Amezcua-Castillo, Jazmin A Guerra-López, Claudia Tavera-Alonso, Héctor González-Pacheco, Luis M Amezcua-Guerra
{"title":"Should a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection be considered a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?","authors":"Kietseé A Díaz-Domínguez, Andrés Cruz-Melendez, Luis M Amezcua-Castillo, Jazmin A Guerra-López, Claudia Tavera-Alonso, Héctor González-Pacheco, Luis M Amezcua-Guerra","doi":"10.24875/ACM.22000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess whether a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection could by itself be a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational study in unvaccinated patients with STEMI confirmed by cardiac catheterization was conducted. A recent or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified by the presence of serum IgG against the nucleocapsid protein, or a positive polymerase chain reaction test on nasopharyngeal swabs. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors, clinical STEMI severity, main catheterization findings, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization were compared between study subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 89 patients recruited, 14 (16%) had a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with STEMI and recent SARS-CoV-2 infection had a markedly lower frequency of high blood pressure (20% versus 55%; P = 0.03) as well as a tendency to have fewer comorbidities. Regarding the clinical presentation, there were no differences in the severity of the STEMI. Furthermore, the main findings during cardiac catheterization including the atherosclerotic burden and the number of vessels affected, as well as the occurrence of MACE during follow-up, were not significantly different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A recent SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to facilitate the triggering of STEMI, as these patients have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors than their uninfected counterparts. However, this does not seem to affect the clinical presentation or the in-hospital course of STEMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8360,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.22000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess whether a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection could by itself be a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Method: An observational study in unvaccinated patients with STEMI confirmed by cardiac catheterization was conducted. A recent or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified by the presence of serum IgG against the nucleocapsid protein, or a positive polymerase chain reaction test on nasopharyngeal swabs. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors, clinical STEMI severity, main catheterization findings, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization were compared between study subgroups.

Results: Of a total of 89 patients recruited, 14 (16%) had a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with STEMI and recent SARS-CoV-2 infection had a markedly lower frequency of high blood pressure (20% versus 55%; P = 0.03) as well as a tendency to have fewer comorbidities. Regarding the clinical presentation, there were no differences in the severity of the STEMI. Furthermore, the main findings during cardiac catheterization including the atherosclerotic burden and the number of vessels affected, as well as the occurrence of MACE during follow-up, were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions: A recent SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to facilitate the triggering of STEMI, as these patients have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors than their uninfected counterparts. However, this does not seem to affect the clinical presentation or the in-hospital course of STEMI patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近期感染 SARS-CoV-2 是否应被视为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的风险或预后因素?
研究目的该研究旨在评估近期感染 SARS-CoV-2 是否会成为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的风险或预后因素:方法:对经心导管检查确诊为 STEMI 的未接种疫苗的患者进行观察研究。通过血清中出现针对核壳蛋白的 IgG 或鼻咽拭子聚合酶链反应检测呈阳性,确定患者近期或同时感染了 SARS-CoV-2。比较了各研究亚组的基线心血管危险因素、临床 STEMI 严重程度、主要导管检查结果以及住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况:在招募的 89 名患者中,有 14 人(16%)近期感染过 SARS-CoV-2。STEMI 和近期感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者患高血压的比例明显较低(20% 对 55%;P = 0.03),合并症也较少。在临床表现方面,STEMI 的严重程度没有差异。此外,心导管检查的主要结果,包括动脉粥样硬化负荷和受影响血管的数量,以及随访期间MACE的发生率,在各组之间没有显著差异:结论:近期感染过 SARS-CoV-2 的患者似乎更容易诱发 STEMI,因为与未感染的患者相比,这些患者的传统心血管风险因素更少。然而,这似乎并不影响 STEMI 患者的临床表现或住院过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Assessment of coronary flow capacity by positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease]. [Acute myocardial infarction patients without COVID-19 manifestations in the pandemic may have high thrombus burden]. [Abnormal aortic origin of coronary arteries]. [Intracardiac leiomyoma]. [Comments to: Recommendations for the care of patients with heart failure and COVID-19].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1