Post-Operative Day Zero Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy Does Not Worsen High-Yield Outcomes: A NSQIP Database Observational Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2022.2119493
Farheen A Qurashi, Alana C Keegan, Christopher R D'Adamo, Joshua H Wolf
{"title":"Post-Operative Day Zero Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy Does Not Worsen High-Yield Outcomes: A NSQIP Database Observational Study.","authors":"Farheen A Qurashi,&nbsp;Alana C Keegan,&nbsp;Christopher R D'Adamo,&nbsp;Joshua H Wolf","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2119493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Post-operative day zero (POD-0) discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis has been studied primarily in single-center or pediatric studies. A larger study from a national sample addressing high-yield outcomes can update and supplement current literature and evaluate early discharge rates. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database study of laparoscopic appendectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis performed 2016–2019, with discharge POD-0 or post-operative day one (POD-1). Study outcomes included any or serious complication, unplanned readmission, and unplanned return to operating room (OR). Unadjusted outcomes comparisons were estimated via chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for potential confounders (sex, ethnicity, frailty, ASA score, tobacco use and diabetes). Results: A total of 25,629 patients were included in this analysis. More patients were discharged POD-1 (n = 15,229) than POD-0 (n = 10,440). Rate of any or serious complication was lower in patients discharged POD-0 than POD-1 (any complication: 2.0 vs. 2.8, p = 0.0002, serious complication: 1.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.0001). Unplanned return to OR and unplanned readmission rates were not different between POD-0 and POD-1 discharged groups (p = 0.9 and p = 0.6, respectively). These findings were robust to adjustment for covariates in logistic regression modeling. Conclusions: This study found that unplanned readmission and other outcomes do not appear to be adversely affected by early discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, confirming prior evidence on the topic in a large, national sample. It also found that early discharge does not appear to be used in most of these patients. Media Summary Post-operative day 0 discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis does not increase readmission or return to OR – but is it happening in practice?","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2119493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: Post-operative day zero (POD-0) discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis has been studied primarily in single-center or pediatric studies. A larger study from a national sample addressing high-yield outcomes can update and supplement current literature and evaluate early discharge rates. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database study of laparoscopic appendectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis performed 2016–2019, with discharge POD-0 or post-operative day one (POD-1). Study outcomes included any or serious complication, unplanned readmission, and unplanned return to operating room (OR). Unadjusted outcomes comparisons were estimated via chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for potential confounders (sex, ethnicity, frailty, ASA score, tobacco use and diabetes). Results: A total of 25,629 patients were included in this analysis. More patients were discharged POD-1 (n = 15,229) than POD-0 (n = 10,440). Rate of any or serious complication was lower in patients discharged POD-0 than POD-1 (any complication: 2.0 vs. 2.8, p = 0.0002, serious complication: 1.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.0001). Unplanned return to OR and unplanned readmission rates were not different between POD-0 and POD-1 discharged groups (p = 0.9 and p = 0.6, respectively). These findings were robust to adjustment for covariates in logistic regression modeling. Conclusions: This study found that unplanned readmission and other outcomes do not appear to be adversely affected by early discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, confirming prior evidence on the topic in a large, national sample. It also found that early discharge does not appear to be used in most of these patients. Media Summary Post-operative day 0 discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis does not increase readmission or return to OR – but is it happening in practice?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜阑尾切除术后零日出院不会恶化高预后:一项NSQIP数据库观察性研究
背景:腹腔镜阑尾切除术后无并发症阑尾炎术后第0天(POD-0)出院研究主要在单中心或儿科研究中进行。一项来自全国样本的更大的研究可以更新和补充现有文献,并评估早期出院率。方法:本研究是一项回顾性、观察性的国家手术质量改进(NSQIP)数据库研究,研究对象为2016-2019年行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的无并发症阑尾炎患者,出院POD-0或术后第一天(POD-1)。研究结果包括任何或严重并发症、意外再入院和意外返回手术室(or)。未经调整的结果比较通过卡方检验估计。建立多变量logistic回归模型来调整潜在的混杂因素(性别、种族、体质、ASA评分、吸烟和糖尿病)。结果:共纳入25,629例患者。POD-1出院患者(n = 15,229)多于POD-0出院患者(n = 10,440)。POD-0出院患者的严重并发症发生率低于POD-1出院患者(严重并发症发生率:2.0比2.8,p = 0.0002;严重并发症发生率:1.4比2.1,p = 0.9和p = 0.6)。这些发现对逻辑回归模型中协变量的校正具有稳健性。结论:本研究发现,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后非复杂性阑尾炎的意外再入院和其他结果似乎没有受到早期出院的不利影响,证实了先前在全国大样本中关于该主题的证据。研究还发现,早期出院似乎并不适用于大多数患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
期刊最新文献
Anterior, Posterior and Anterior-Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The HIF-1α/PKM2 Feedback Loop in Relation to EGFR Mutational Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Posttranscriptional Regulation of Intestinal Mucosal Growth and Adaptation by Noncoding RNAs in Critical Surgical Disorders. Statement of Retraction: Liver X Receptors Activation Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of Liver Graft in Rats. Correlation Between Basal Metabolic Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1