Habitual physical activity levels in women attending the one stop infertility clinic: A prospective cross-sectional observational study.

Nicola Tempest, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Hannan Al-Lamee, Evie R Oliver, Emily E Slaine, Andrew J Drakeley, Victoria S Sprung, Dharani K Hapangama
{"title":"Habitual physical activity levels in women attending the one stop infertility clinic: A prospective cross-sectional observational study.","authors":"Nicola Tempest, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Hannan Al-Lamee, Evie R Oliver, Emily E Slaine, Andrew J Drakeley, Victoria S Sprung, Dharani K Hapangama","doi":"10.1530/RAF-22-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimisation of lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol are encouraged to improve fecundability rates in the fertility setting. Currently, routine fertility consultations do not involve counselling or imparting advice regarding habitual physical activity (PA) and/or structured exercise, despite data showing that vigorous PA can be associated with delayed time to pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to determine habitual PA in a sample of women attending the one stop infertility (OSI) clinic. 250 women attending a large tertiary level NHS fertility unit prospectively anonymously completed a questionnaire over a period of 9 months. Participant's (mean age 34±5years, mean BMI 29±7kg/m2) habitual PA levels varied from vigorous exercise on ≥5 days/week (8%, n=17), to no moderate or high intensity activities across the whole week (66%, n=29). The majority of women reported no structured exercise (72%, n=179). No association was identified between any domain of PA and BMI, age, alcohol units, regular periods, or time spent trying to conceive (P > 0.05). Participant's habitual PA levels varied widely and no association between any domain of PA and background of the women was identified. No existing evidence and/or guidelines to explicitly inform women attempting to conceive regarding recommended PA levels are available, despite PA being a modifiable, affordable, and feasible lifestyle choice with the possible potential to improve fertility. A large-scale, clinical trial assessing effects of PA on fecundability is warranted to gain insights into the potential of this lifestyle factor to improve fertility outcomes and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":21128,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-22-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimisation of lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol are encouraged to improve fecundability rates in the fertility setting. Currently, routine fertility consultations do not involve counselling or imparting advice regarding habitual physical activity (PA) and/or structured exercise, despite data showing that vigorous PA can be associated with delayed time to pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to determine habitual PA in a sample of women attending the one stop infertility (OSI) clinic. 250 women attending a large tertiary level NHS fertility unit prospectively anonymously completed a questionnaire over a period of 9 months. Participant's (mean age 34±5years, mean BMI 29±7kg/m2) habitual PA levels varied from vigorous exercise on ≥5 days/week (8%, n=17), to no moderate or high intensity activities across the whole week (66%, n=29). The majority of women reported no structured exercise (72%, n=179). No association was identified between any domain of PA and BMI, age, alcohol units, regular periods, or time spent trying to conceive (P > 0.05). Participant's habitual PA levels varied widely and no association between any domain of PA and background of the women was identified. No existing evidence and/or guidelines to explicitly inform women attempting to conceive regarding recommended PA levels are available, despite PA being a modifiable, affordable, and feasible lifestyle choice with the possible potential to improve fertility. A large-scale, clinical trial assessing effects of PA on fecundability is warranted to gain insights into the potential of this lifestyle factor to improve fertility outcomes and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms involved.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一站式不孕不育诊所就诊妇女的习惯性体育锻炼水平:前瞻性横断面观察研究。
我们鼓励优化吸烟和酗酒等生活方式因素,以提高生育环境中的受孕率。目前,尽管有数据显示,剧烈的体力活动可能与怀孕时间推迟有关,但常规生育咨询并不涉及有关习惯性体力活动(PA)和/或结构化锻炼的咨询或建议。因此,本研究旨在对一站式不孕不育(OSI)门诊就诊妇女的习惯性体力活动进行抽样调查。在一家大型三级国家医疗服务体系不孕不育科就诊的 250 名妇女在 9 个月内匿名填写了一份调查问卷。参与者(平均年龄(34±5)岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为 29±7kg/m2)的习惯性体育锻炼水平不尽相同,有的每周≥5 天都进行剧烈运动(8%,人数=17),有的一周都没有进行中度或高强度活动(66%,人数=29)。大多数女性表示没有进行过有计划的锻炼(72%,人数=179)。没有发现任何 PA 领域与体重指数、年龄、酒精单位、月经规律或试图怀孕的时间之间存在关联(P > 0.05)。参与者的习惯性 PA 水平差异很大,没有发现任何 PA 领域与妇女的背景有关。尽管 PA 是一种可调节、可负担且可行的生活方式选择,并有可能改善生育能力,但目前还没有证据和/或指南明确告知尝试怀孕的女性 PA 的建议水平。有必要进行一项大规模的临床试验,评估 PA 对受孕能力的影响,以深入了解这种生活方式对改善受孕结果的潜力,并探索相关的潜在生物机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The (cost-) effectiveness Of Surgical excision of Colorectal endometriosis compared to ART treatment trAjectory (TOSCA study) - a study protocol. Quality of fresh and cryopreserved bovine sperm is reduced by BPA and BPF exposure. Presence of KREMEN receptors for DKK1 in the preimplantation bovine embryo. Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Impact of vitamin B12 on the reproductive health of women with sickle cell disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1