Effect of sputum quality and role of Xpert® MTB/ RIF assay for detection of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in same-day diagnosis strategy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1671
Waganeh Sinshaw, Abebaw Kebede, Adane Bitew, Mengistu Tadesse, Zemedu Mehamed, Ayinalem Alemu, Bazezew Yenew, Misikir Amare, Biniyam Dagne, Getu Diriba, Ephrem Tesfaye, Dinka F Gamtesa, Yeshiwork Abebaw, Helina Molallign Mollalign, Getachew Seid, Muluwork Getahun
{"title":"Effect of sputum quality and role of Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/ RIF assay for detection of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in same-day diagnosis strategy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.","authors":"Waganeh Sinshaw, Abebaw Kebede, Adane Bitew, Mengistu Tadesse, Zemedu Mehamed, Ayinalem Alemu, Bazezew Yenew, Misikir Amare, Biniyam Dagne, Getu Diriba, Ephrem Tesfaye, Dinka F Gamtesa, Yeshiwork Abebaw, Helina Molallign Mollalign, Getachew Seid, Muluwork Getahun","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the performance of the Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPT) and rifampicin resistance (RR) in the same-day diagnosis approach. The effects of sputum quality and other factors affecting the Xpert performance are also under-investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the performance of the Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF test for detection of SNPT and RR in the same-day diagnosis strategy and the effect of sputum quality and other factors on its performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2017 to January 2018 across 16 health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Two spot sputum samples were collected from 418 presumptive SNPT patients, tested with Xpert® MTB/RIF, then compared to tuberculosis culture. Additionally, culture isolates were tested for RR by BACTEC MGIT™ 960 drug susceptibility testing (DST) and MTBDRplus version 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF test detected 24 (5.7%) SNPT cases, with a sensitivity of 92.3% (75.9% - 97.9%) and specificity of 99.2% (97.8% - 99.7%) compared with tuberculosis culture. Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF also detected three (11.58%) RR strains with 100.0% concordance with BACTEC MGIT™ 960 DST and MTBDRplus results. Three blood-stained SNPT samples were positive by Xpert (30.0%), which was 6.9 times higher compared to salivary sputum (odds ratio: 6.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-34.96, <i>p</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of the Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF to detect SNPT and RR in same-day diagnosis is high. However, SNPT positivity varies among sputum qualities, and good sample collection is necessary for better test performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited information on the performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPT) and rifampicin resistance (RR) in the same-day diagnosis approach. The effects of sputum quality and other factors affecting the Xpert performance are also under-investigated.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for detection of SNPT and RR in the same-day diagnosis strategy and the effect of sputum quality and other factors on its performance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2017 to January 2018 across 16 health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Two spot sputum samples were collected from 418 presumptive SNPT patients, tested with Xpert® MTB/RIF, then compared to tuberculosis culture. Additionally, culture isolates were tested for RR by BACTEC MGIT™ 960 drug susceptibility testing (DST) and MTBDRplus version 2.

Results: The Xpert® MTB/RIF test detected 24 (5.7%) SNPT cases, with a sensitivity of 92.3% (75.9% - 97.9%) and specificity of 99.2% (97.8% - 99.7%) compared with tuberculosis culture. Xpert® MTB/RIF also detected three (11.58%) RR strains with 100.0% concordance with BACTEC MGIT™ 960 DST and MTBDRplus results. Three blood-stained SNPT samples were positive by Xpert (30.0%), which was 6.9 times higher compared to salivary sputum (odds ratio: 6.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-34.96, p = 0.020).

Conclusion: The performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF to detect SNPT and RR in same-day diagnosis is high. However, SNPT positivity varies among sputum qualities, and good sample collection is necessary for better test performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痰液质量的影响和 Xpert® MTB/ RIF 检测法在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴当天诊断策略中检测涂片阴性肺结核中的作用。
背景:有关 Xpert® MTB/RIF 检测仪在诊断涂片阴性肺结核(SNPT)和利福平耐药性(RR)方面的性能的信息十分有限。痰液质量和其他因素对 Xpert 性能的影响也未得到充分研究:本研究旨在确定 Xpert® MTB/RIF 检验在当天诊断策略中检测 SNPT 和 RR 的性能,以及痰液质量和其他因素对其性能的影响:2017年8月至2018年1月,在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的16家医疗机构开展了一项横断面研究。从 418 名推测为 SNPT 的患者中采集了两份痰液样本,用 Xpert® MTB/RIF 进行检测,然后与结核菌培养结果进行比较。此外,还通过 BACTEC MGIT™ 960 药物敏感性检测(DST)和 MTBDRplus 2.0 版对培养分离物进行了 RR 检测:Xpert® MTB/RIF 检测发现了 24 例(5.7%)SNPT 病例,与结核菌培养相比,灵敏度为 92.3%(75.9% - 97.9%),特异性为 99.2%(97.8% - 99.7%)。Xpert® MTB/RIF 还检测出三个(11.58%)RR 菌株,与 BACTEC MGIT™ 960 DST 和 MTBDRplus 结果的一致性为 100.0%。Xpert检测出3份血染SNPT样本呈阳性(30.0%),是唾液痰的6.9倍(几率比:6.9,95%置信区间:1.36-34.96,P = 0.020):结论:Xpert® MTB/RIF 检测 SNPT 和 RR 在当天诊断中的性能很高。结论:Xpert® MTB/RIF 在当天诊断中检测 SNPT 和 RR 的性能较高,但 SNPT 阳性率因痰液质量而异,要想提高检测性能,就必须进行良好的样本采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
期刊最新文献
Pathobiology of HIV-related metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities: Towards a unifying mechanism. An audit of the iron status of patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, in Johannesburg, South Africa. Carriers of the m.3243A>G variant should not be labelled with an acronym before they have been systematically screened for multisystem disease. Challenges with communication of critical laboratory results in a resource-limited setting in South Africa. Association between coagulation indicators and menorrhagia among women in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1