Bacteriological profile and antibiogram of blood culture isolates from bloodstream infections in a rural tertiary hospital in Nigeria.

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1807
Oluwalana T Oyekale, Bola O Ojo, Adewale T Olajide, Oluwatoyin I Oyekale
{"title":"Bacteriological profile and antibiogram of blood culture isolates from bloodstream infections in a rural tertiary hospital in Nigeria.","authors":"Oluwalana T Oyekale,&nbsp;Bola O Ojo,&nbsp;Adewale T Olajide,&nbsp;Oluwatoyin I Oyekale","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality requiring urgent antibiotic treatment. However, there is widespread antibiotic-resistance from the bacterial causes, necessitating regular surveillance for drug-resistant bacteria and their antibiograms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study isolated and identified various bacterial causes of BSIs, determined their antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and determined the best empirical treatment for cases of BSI in the setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria between June 2020 and February 2021 on 177 blood culture samples from cases of BSI. Identification of isolated bacteria and antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolates were carried out following the standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Culture positivity in this study was 19.2%. No significant difference was seen in culture positivity between male and female participants (<i>p</i> = 0.97). Gram-negative enteric bacteria were predominantly isolated (67.6%), including <i>Escherichia coli</i> (29.4%) and <i>Klebsiella aerogenes</i> (20.6%). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most common Gram-positive bacterium isolated (23.5%). Three (37.5%) <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were methicillin-resistant. All isolates were sensitive to meropenem, and 97.1% were sensitive to imipenem; other sensitivity patterns were: ceftazidime (85.3%), ciprofloxacin (79.4%), ofloxacin (79.4%), and gentamicin (76.5%). There was low sensitivity to ampicillin (32.4%) and cotrimoxazole (38.2%). All Gram-positive isolates, including methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i>, were sensitive to vancomycin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular surveillance of isolate sensitivity patterns, formulation of hospital antibiotic policies based on existing data and compliance with treatment guidelines will promote rational antibiotic use and reduce resistance among bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453184/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality requiring urgent antibiotic treatment. However, there is widespread antibiotic-resistance from the bacterial causes, necessitating regular surveillance for drug-resistant bacteria and their antibiograms.

Objective: This study isolated and identified various bacterial causes of BSIs, determined their antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and determined the best empirical treatment for cases of BSI in the setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria between June 2020 and February 2021 on 177 blood culture samples from cases of BSI. Identification of isolated bacteria and antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolates were carried out following the standard protocol.

Results: Culture positivity in this study was 19.2%. No significant difference was seen in culture positivity between male and female participants (p = 0.97). Gram-negative enteric bacteria were predominantly isolated (67.6%), including Escherichia coli (29.4%) and Klebsiella aerogenes (20.6%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common Gram-positive bacterium isolated (23.5%). Three (37.5%) S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant. All isolates were sensitive to meropenem, and 97.1% were sensitive to imipenem; other sensitivity patterns were: ceftazidime (85.3%), ciprofloxacin (79.4%), ofloxacin (79.4%), and gentamicin (76.5%). There was low sensitivity to ampicillin (32.4%) and cotrimoxazole (38.2%). All Gram-positive isolates, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, were sensitive to vancomycin.

Conclusion: Regular surveillance of isolate sensitivity patterns, formulation of hospital antibiotic policies based on existing data and compliance with treatment guidelines will promote rational antibiotic use and reduce resistance among bacteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚一家农村三级医院血液感染中血培养分离株的细菌学特征和抗生素谱。
背景:血流感染(bsi)是一个重要的发病率和死亡率的原因,需要紧急抗生素治疗。然而,细菌引起的抗生素耐药性广泛存在,因此有必要定期监测耐药细菌及其抗生素谱。目的:本研究分离并鉴定了引起BSI的各种细菌,确定了它们的抗生素敏感性模式,并确定了该环境下BSI病例的最佳经验性治疗方法。方法:于2020年6月至2021年2月在尼日利亚伊多埃基蒂联邦教学医院对177例BSI病例的血培养样本进行了横断面研究。按照标准方案进行分离菌鉴定和药敏试验。结果:培养阳性率为19.2%。男性和女性受试者在文化积极性方面无显著差异(p = 0.97)。革兰氏阴性肠道细菌以大肠埃希菌(29.4%)和产气克雷伯菌(20.6%)为主(67.6%)。革兰氏阳性菌中最常见的是金黄色葡萄球菌(23.5%)。3株金黄色葡萄球菌(37.5%)对甲氧西林耐药。所有分离株对美罗培南均敏感,其中97.1%对亚胺培南敏感;其他敏感型为:头孢他啶(85.3%)、环丙沙星(79.4%)、氧氟沙星(79.4%)、庆大霉素(76.5%)。氨苄西林(32.4%)和复方新诺明(38.2%)敏感性较低。所有革兰氏阳性分离株,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,对万古霉素敏感。结论:定期监测分离物的药敏模式,根据现有数据制定医院抗生素政策,遵守治疗指南,可促进合理使用抗生素,减少细菌耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
期刊最新文献
Pathobiology of HIV-related metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities: Towards a unifying mechanism. An audit of the iron status of patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, in Johannesburg, South Africa. Carriers of the m.3243A>G variant should not be labelled with an acronym before they have been systematically screened for multisystem disease. Challenges with communication of critical laboratory results in a resource-limited setting in South Africa. Association between coagulation indicators and menorrhagia among women in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1