Silanizing Effectiveness on the Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Composite Repaired After Sandblasting or Bur Abrasion Treatments: An in vitro Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S381235
Huda Hashim, Manal Hussain Abd-Alla
{"title":"Silanizing Effectiveness on the Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Composite Repaired After Sandblasting or Bur Abrasion Treatments: An in vitro Study.","authors":"Huda Hashim,&nbsp;Manal Hussain Abd-Alla","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S381235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged bulk-fill composite after different mechanical (diamond bur vs sandblasting) and chemical (universal adhesive with or without a previous silanization) surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) was used to construct seventy-two specimens aged through 10,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were allocated into two groups (n = 36 each) according to the mechanical roughening: Db, treated with a diamond bur, and Sb, treated by sandblasting. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 12 each) according to the chemical conditioning: Db-only and Sb-only, unconditioned specimens; Db-U and Sb-U, specimens were conditioned with silane-containing universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE); and Db-S-U and Sb-S-U, specimens were conditioned with a silane agent (Prosil, FGM) before employing the universal adhesive. The same composite material was used for repair. An additional reference group was constructed to measure the cohesive strengths of the bulk-fill composite. SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure modes were evaluated by stereomicroscope. The surface topography of resin composite after roughening was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. SBS data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey's test and independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significantly highest SBS was recorded in the reference group (P ≤ 0.05). Sb-only obtained significantly higher SBS than Db-only (P < 0.001). No significant difference in SBS was noted between Db-U and Sb-U or Db-S-U and Sb-S-U. Likewise, no significant difference was observed between the subgroups treated with or without silane (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sandblasted specimens demonstrated a higher repair SBS than the diamond bur-treated specimens. The use of an additional silanizing step before applying silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the SBS of the repaired composite.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/e4/ccide-14-265.PMC9462518.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S381235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To measure the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged bulk-fill composite after different mechanical (diamond bur vs sandblasting) and chemical (universal adhesive with or without a previous silanization) surface treatments.

Materials and methods: Bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) was used to construct seventy-two specimens aged through 10,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were allocated into two groups (n = 36 each) according to the mechanical roughening: Db, treated with a diamond bur, and Sb, treated by sandblasting. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 12 each) according to the chemical conditioning: Db-only and Sb-only, unconditioned specimens; Db-U and Sb-U, specimens were conditioned with silane-containing universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE); and Db-S-U and Sb-S-U, specimens were conditioned with a silane agent (Prosil, FGM) before employing the universal adhesive. The same composite material was used for repair. An additional reference group was constructed to measure the cohesive strengths of the bulk-fill composite. SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure modes were evaluated by stereomicroscope. The surface topography of resin composite after roughening was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. SBS data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey's test and independent t-test.

Results: The significantly highest SBS was recorded in the reference group (P ≤ 0.05). Sb-only obtained significantly higher SBS than Db-only (P < 0.001). No significant difference in SBS was noted between Db-U and Sb-U or Db-S-U and Sb-S-U. Likewise, no significant difference was observed between the subgroups treated with or without silane (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The sandblasted specimens demonstrated a higher repair SBS than the diamond bur-treated specimens. The use of an additional silanizing step before applying silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the SBS of the repaired composite.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喷砂或磨砂修复的老化堆填复合材料的硅化效果:体外研究。
目的:测定老化体填料复合材料在经过不同机械(喷砂与金刚石)和化学(通用粘接或未进行硅化处理)表面处理后的修复剪切强度(SBS)。材料和方法:使用填充复合材料(Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE)构建72个经过10,000次热循环老化的样品。根据机械粗化程度将试样分为两组,每组36个,分别用金刚石钎处理Db和喷砂处理Sb。每组按化学条件再细分为3个亚组(每组n = 12):无化学条件的b组和sb组;Db-U和Sb-U用含硅烷万能胶(Scotchbond万能胶,3M ESPE)处理;以及Db-S-U和Sb-S-U,在使用通用粘合剂之前,用硅烷剂(Prosil, FGM)对样品进行处理。采用相同的复合材料进行修复。另外建立了一个参照组来测量堆填复合材料的内聚强度。采用万能试验机,以1 mm/min的十字速度进行SBS试验,并用体视显微镜评估失效模式。用扫描电镜观察粗化后树脂复合材料的表面形貌。SBS资料采用方差分析、Tukey检验和独立t检验进行统计学分析。结果:参照组的SBS最高(P≤0.05)。单用sb组的SBS明显高于单用db组(P < 0.001)。b- u与Sb-U或b- s - u与Sb-S-U之间的SBS无显著差异。同样,添加或未添加硅烷的亚组间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:喷砂处理的试样比金刚石毛刺处理的试样具有更高的修复SBS。在使用含硅烷万能胶之前使用额外的硅化步骤并没有提高修复复合材料的SBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite Agarose-Based Hydrogel for Biomimetic Remineralization of Demineralized Human Enamel: An in-vitro Study. Enhancing Communication Between Dental Laboratories and Clinics: The Role of Information Technology Systems in a Developing Country. The Correlation Between Odontogenic Infection and Total Spectrum of Dental Caries with Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Children with Intellectual Disabilities. User Insights into Fake Snap-on Veneers: Perceptions and Experiences. A Retrospective Evaluation of Mandibular Fracture in Kabul, Afghanistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1