Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-10-21 Epub Date: 2021-08-23 DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873
Howard Ryland, Jonathan Cook, Rob Ferris, Sarah Markham, Christian Sales, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Seena Fazel
{"title":"Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.","authors":"Howard Ryland, Jonathan Cook, Rob Ferris, Sarah Markham, Christian Sales, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Seena Fazel","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forensic mental health services provide care to people in secure psychiatric hospitals and via specialised community teams. Such services are typically low volume and high cost, often highly restrictive and average duration of inpatient care prior to discharge is long. Measuring outcomes of care is important to safeguard patients and the public, monitor progress, inform treatment plans and assist in service evaluation and planning. We describe the development in England of a new outcome measure for forensic mental health services. Patient interviews and multistakeholder focus groups were held to elicit key concepts. Thematic analysis was used to develop an outcomes framework. Fifteen patients participated in the interviews and 48 stakeholders in the focus groups. Six domains were identified in thematic analysis: 'about me, my quality of life, my health, my safety and risk, my life skills and my progress'. Sixty-two stakeholders participated in the first round of the Delphi process, and 49 completed round two. Eight of the top fifteen outcomes were shared between patients/carers and professionals. Based on these results, a new outcome measure, the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), was developed including both a patient reported and clinician reported measure. Further assessment of the FORUM's use to track patients' progress over time, and facilitate shared decision-making and care planning, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Crime & Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic mental health services provide care to people in secure psychiatric hospitals and via specialised community teams. Such services are typically low volume and high cost, often highly restrictive and average duration of inpatient care prior to discharge is long. Measuring outcomes of care is important to safeguard patients and the public, monitor progress, inform treatment plans and assist in service evaluation and planning. We describe the development in England of a new outcome measure for forensic mental health services. Patient interviews and multistakeholder focus groups were held to elicit key concepts. Thematic analysis was used to develop an outcomes framework. Fifteen patients participated in the interviews and 48 stakeholders in the focus groups. Six domains were identified in thematic analysis: 'about me, my quality of life, my health, my safety and risk, my life skills and my progress'. Sixty-two stakeholders participated in the first round of the Delphi process, and 49 completed round two. Eight of the top fifteen outcomes were shared between patients/carers and professionals. Based on these results, a new outcome measure, the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), was developed including both a patient reported and clinician reported measure. Further assessment of the FORUM's use to track patients' progress over time, and facilitate shared decision-making and care planning, is required.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发 FORUM:一种新的病人和临床医生报告的法医精神健康服务结果测量方法。
法医精神健康服务通过安全的精神病院和专门的社区团队为患者提供治疗。此类服务通常数量少、成本高,通常限制性很强,出院前的平均住院治疗时间很长。衡量治疗效果对于保障患者和公众安全、监控治疗进展、为治疗计划提供信息以及协助服务评估和规划都非常重要。我们介绍了英格兰为法医精神健康服务制定新结果衡量标准的情况。我们对患者进行了访谈,并召开了多方利益相关者焦点小组会议,以引出关键概念。采用主题分析法来制定结果框架。15 名患者参与了访谈,48 名利益相关者参与了焦点小组。主题分析确定了六个领域:"关于我、我的生活质量、我的健康、我的安全和风险、我的生活技能和我的进步"。62 名利益相关者参与了第一轮德尔菲进程,49 名利益相关者完成了第二轮。患者/护理人员和专业人员共同认可了前十五项结果中的八项。在这些结果的基础上,我们开发了一种新的结果测量方法--FORensic 结果测量方法(FORUM),其中包括患者报告和临床医生报告两种测量方法。需要进一步评估 FORUM 的使用情况,以跟踪患者的长期进展,促进共同决策和护理规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: This journal promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to crime, criminal and civil law, and the influence of law on behavior. The content includes the aetiology of criminal behavior and studies of different offender groups; crime detection, for example, interrogation and witness testimony; courtroom studies in areas such as jury behavior, decision making, divorce and custody, and expert testimony; behavior of litigants, lawyers, judges, and court officers, both in and outside the courtroom; issues of offender management including prisons, probation, and rehabilitation initiatives; and studies of public, including the victim, reactions to crime and the legal process.
期刊最新文献
An optimal trauma-informed pathway for PTSD, complex PTSD and other mental health and psychosocial impacts of trauma in prisons: an expert consensus statement Mock jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions A double standard in evaluating implicit threats Defense attorney perspectives about juvenile interrogations: SROs, parents, and the adolescent defendant Cultural context and sentencing: content analysis of sentencing remarks for Indigenous defendants of domestic violence in the Northern Territory, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1