Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair: Should it be the preferred technique?

Christos Doudakmanis, Christina Kolla, Konstantinos Bouliaris, Matthaios Efthimiou, Georgios D Koukoulis
{"title":"Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair: Should it be the preferred technique?","authors":"Christos Doudakmanis,&nbsp;Christina Kolla,&nbsp;Konstantinos Bouliaris,&nbsp;Matthaios Efthimiou,&nbsp;Georgios D Koukoulis","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention. For decades, the preferred approach was the open repair. As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons became familiarized with this modality, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair became an alternative. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal repair, with a focus on bilateral inguinal hernias. Initial reports have shown promising clinical outcomes compared to those of conventional repair of bilateral hernias. However, there are only a few studies concerning laparoscopic repair of bilateral hernias. It is yet to be proven that laparoscopy is the \"gold standard\" in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias. So far, the choice of an inguinal hernia repair technique has been up to each surgeon, depending on their expertise and available resources after taking into consideration each patient's needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23729,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"12 4","pages":"193-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/eb/WJM-12-193.PMC9350731.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention. For decades, the preferred approach was the open repair. As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons became familiarized with this modality, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair became an alternative. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal repair, with a focus on bilateral inguinal hernias. Initial reports have shown promising clinical outcomes compared to those of conventional repair of bilateral hernias. However, there are only a few studies concerning laparoscopic repair of bilateral hernias. It is yet to be proven that laparoscopy is the "gold standard" in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias. So far, the choice of an inguinal hernia repair technique has been up to each surgeon, depending on their expertise and available resources after taking into consideration each patient's needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术:应该是首选技术吗?
腹股沟疝是最常见的条件需要一般的手术干预。几十年来,首选的方法是开放式修复。随着腹腔镜手术越来越普及,越来越多的外科医生熟悉这种手术方式,腹腔镜腹股沟疝修复成为一种选择。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜腹股沟修复的有效性,重点是双侧腹股沟疝。与传统的双侧疝修复相比,初步报告显示有希望的临床结果。然而,关于腹腔镜双侧疝修补术的研究很少。腹腔镜是治疗双侧腹股沟疝的“金标准”尚待证实。到目前为止,腹股沟疝修补技术的选择取决于每位外科医生,在考虑每位患者的需求后,取决于他们的专业知识和可用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sequential extraction of RNA, DNA and protein from cultured cells of the same group Crohn's disease and clinical management today: How it does? Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture Adult eosinophilic esophagitis and advances in its treatment. Epidemiological trends in acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort in a tertiary center over a seven year period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1