How do people understand the spread of COVID-19 infections? Mapping mental models of factors contributing to the pandemic.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2022.2129054
Denise T D de Ridder, Lieke A T P van den Boom, Floor M Kroese, Ellen H M Moors, Karlijn L van den Broek
{"title":"How do people understand the spread of COVID-19 infections? Mapping mental models of factors contributing to the pandemic.","authors":"Denise T D de Ridder, Lieke A T P van den Boom, Floor M Kroese, Ellen H M Moors, Karlijn L van den Broek","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2022.2129054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the mental models people hold about the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on how they understand the factors that drive the spread of COVID-19 and what kind of beliefs are associated with these models.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In a series of three studies (total N = 461), we asked participants to identify factors that are relevant for COVID-19 proliferation (Study 1a), rate the importance of factors (Study 1 b), and create a mental model of how these factors relate to virus spread by employing a validated tool for mental model elicitation (Study 2). Main outcome measures: inclusion and centrality of factors in mental models of COVID-19 infection spread.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mitigation measures issued by government, adherence to measures, and virus characteristics were most strongly represented in participants' mental models. Participants who perceived measures as appropriate or who experienced more control and more worry over the spread of the virus created more complex models compared to participants who were less satisfied with measures or who felt lower control and less worry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that people are able to create sensible mental models of virus transmission but may appreciate transparent communication to comprehend the bigger picture behind the governmental mitigation strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2129054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the mental models people hold about the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on how they understand the factors that drive the spread of COVID-19 and what kind of beliefs are associated with these models.

Design: In a series of three studies (total N = 461), we asked participants to identify factors that are relevant for COVID-19 proliferation (Study 1a), rate the importance of factors (Study 1 b), and create a mental model of how these factors relate to virus spread by employing a validated tool for mental model elicitation (Study 2). Main outcome measures: inclusion and centrality of factors in mental models of COVID-19 infection spread.

Results: Mitigation measures issued by government, adherence to measures, and virus characteristics were most strongly represented in participants' mental models. Participants who perceived measures as appropriate or who experienced more control and more worry over the spread of the virus created more complex models compared to participants who were less satisfied with measures or who felt lower control and less worry.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that people are able to create sensible mental models of virus transmission but may appreciate transparent communication to comprehend the bigger picture behind the governmental mitigation strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们如何理解 COVID-19 感染的传播?绘制导致大流行因素的心理模型。
目的:描述人们对 COVID-19 大流行所持有的心理模式,重点关注他们如何理解推动 COVID-19 传播的因素以及与这些模式相关的信念类型:描述人们对 COVID-19 大流行所持有的心理模型,重点关注他们如何理解推动 COVID-19 传播的因素以及这些模型与何种信念相关:在三个系列的研究中(总人数 = 461),我们要求参与者识别与 COVID-19 扩散相关的因素(研究 1a),对这些因素的重要性进行评分(研究 1b),并通过使用一种经过验证的心理模型激发工具,创建这些因素与病毒传播之间关系的心理模型(研究 2)。主要结果测量指标:COVID-19 感染传播心理模型中各因素的包含情况和中心程度:结果:在参与者的心智模型中,政府发布的缓解措施、对措施的遵守情况以及病毒特征得到了最有力的体现。认为措施适当或对病毒传播有更强控制力和更多担忧的参与者与对措施不太满意或控制力较弱和担忧较少的参与者相比,建立的模型更为复杂:这些研究结果表明,人们能够建立合理的病毒传播心理模型,但可能需要透明的沟通来理解政府减灾战略背后的大局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Broad versus narrow bandwidth measures of experienced automaticity for physical activity. Fluctuations in core depressive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients. A prospective, population-based PROFILES-registry study. Understanding the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with comorbid dementia and cancer. Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We meat again: a field study on the moderating role of location-specific consumer preferences in nudging vegetarian options.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1