Building high-quality interpersonal staff-client relationships with people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior: Insights of professionals and relatives.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1177/17446295221131443
Maaike Hermsen, Rianne Simons, Hennie van Veen, Angela Prudon, Lina Rooijackers, Roy Otten, Renske Koordeman
{"title":"Building high-quality interpersonal staff-client relationships with people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior: Insights of professionals and relatives.","authors":"Maaike Hermsen, Rianne Simons, Hennie van Veen, Angela Prudon, Lina Rooijackers, Roy Otten, Renske Koordeman","doi":"10.1177/17446295221131443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Staff-client relationships impact the quality of support and life of people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior, but are challenging to build due to clients' intense, complex and varying support needs. The present study explores the perspectives of professionals and relatives on what affects these interpersonal relationships. <b>Method:</b> 17 professionals and 11 relatives participated in focus groups and interviews. Data collection and analysis was performed in collaboration with a co-researcher. Data were synthesized thematically. <b>Results:</b> Interpersonal relationships constituted equivalence, striving for mutual understanding, trust and exploring clients' potential. The combination of staff characteristics (enthusiasm/passion, patience, resilience, creativity/humor, flexibility) and expertise (knowledge, vulnerability/sincerity, self-reflection) enabled staff to build these relationships. The importance of involving relatives was addressed. Contextual influences included the team (cooperation, flexibility, culture), organization (cooperation, boundary conditions) and setting (predictability, interior/atmosphere). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings make practical knowledge explicit and scientifically underpinned for this specific population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295221131443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staff-client relationships impact the quality of support and life of people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior, but are challenging to build due to clients' intense, complex and varying support needs. The present study explores the perspectives of professionals and relatives on what affects these interpersonal relationships. Method: 17 professionals and 11 relatives participated in focus groups and interviews. Data collection and analysis was performed in collaboration with a co-researcher. Data were synthesized thematically. Results: Interpersonal relationships constituted equivalence, striving for mutual understanding, trust and exploring clients' potential. The combination of staff characteristics (enthusiasm/passion, patience, resilience, creativity/humor, flexibility) and expertise (knowledge, vulnerability/sincerity, self-reflection) enabled staff to build these relationships. The importance of involving relatives was addressed. Contextual influences included the team (cooperation, flexibility, culture), organization (cooperation, boundary conditions) and setting (predictability, interior/atmosphere). Conclusions: The findings make practical knowledge explicit and scientifically underpinned for this specific population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与有严重至极度智力障碍和挑战行为的人建立高质量的工作人员与客户之间的人际关系:专业人士和亲属的见解。
背景:工作人员与客户之间的关系影响着重度到极重度智障者和有挑战行为者的支持质量和生活质量,但由于客户的支持需求强烈、复杂且各不相同,因此建立这种关系具有挑战性。本研究从专业人员和亲属的角度探讨了影响这些人际关系的因素。研究方法17 名专业人员和 11 名亲属参加了焦点小组和访谈。数据收集和分析是与一名合作研究者共同完成的。对数据进行了专题综合。结果人与人之间的关系是平等的,力求相互理解、信任和发掘服务对象的潜力。工作人员的特点(热情/激情、耐心、应变能力、创造力/幽默、灵活性)和专业知识(知识、脆弱/真诚、自我反省)相结合,使工作人员能够建立这些关系。讨论了亲属参与的重要性。影响因素包括团队(合作、灵活性、文化)、组织(合作、边界条件)和环境(可预测性、内部/氛围)。结论:研究结果为这一特殊群体提供了明确的实用知识和科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers. The effect of motor dual-task training on gait and mobility performances in children with intellectual disabilities. Evidence-based decision-making in the treatment of speech, language, and communication disorders in Down syndrome; a scoping review. How differentiated can a new tablet-based reading screening measure the reading proficiency of students with intellectual disabilities? Comparing the impact of disability, disability type and grade level on reading skills. Trauma-informed counseling for individuals who have an intellectual developmental disorder: Considerations for mental health counselors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1