Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Women's Expectations: an Original Study.

Anna Glynou, Dionysios Galatis, Kalliopi Christakakou-Fotiadi, Vassilis Yalelis, Ioannis E Varvarigos, Kondylios Antonios, Sarella Angeliki, Eleftheriades Makarios, Chasalevri Eirini, Koukaki Maria, Salakos Nicolaos
{"title":"Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Women's Expectations: an Original Study.","authors":"Anna Glynou,&nbsp;Dionysios Galatis,&nbsp;Kalliopi Christakakou-Fotiadi,&nbsp;Vassilis Yalelis,&nbsp;Ioannis E Varvarigos,&nbsp;Kondylios Antonios,&nbsp;Sarella Angeliki,&nbsp;Eleftheriades Makarios,&nbsp;Chasalevri Eirini,&nbsp;Koukaki Maria,&nbsp;Salakos Nicolaos","doi":"10.5455/msm.2022.34.136-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prenatal screening offers crucial information about the pregnancy, although sometimes brings forth ethical issues and potentially difficult decisions for pregnant women. Ultrasound screening during pregnancy is both of particular importance and a great challenge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess women's knowledge and expectations regarding prenatal ultrasound screening in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between May 2019 and January 2020. Three hundred pregnant women >18 years of age with complete antenatal routine screening, were invited to participate. The questionnaire contained sociodemographic and obstetric history information and highlighted the background knowledge of pregnant women in prenatal screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, women with university or technological education mentioned in a greater proportion the importance of prenatal screening regarding prevention and treatment of intrauterine diseases. The belief that the pain or sorrow to give birth to a disabled child or one with a genetic disorder might lead parents to the decision to terminate the pregnancy, was supported more by women with a higher educational level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant women place a great deal of trust in their physician, as a source of information for the fetal well-being. The majority consider prenatal testing mandatory for that matter. Finally, an association between women who abide with prenatal screening and their educational level was noted. Thus, it's more common women who have a higher educational level to seek prenatal screening, than those with lower education level.</p>","PeriodicalId":18358,"journal":{"name":"Materia Socio-Medica","volume":"34 2","pages":"136-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/26/MSM-34-136.PMC9478537.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia Socio-Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2022.34.136-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prenatal screening offers crucial information about the pregnancy, although sometimes brings forth ethical issues and potentially difficult decisions for pregnant women. Ultrasound screening during pregnancy is both of particular importance and a great challenge.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess women's knowledge and expectations regarding prenatal ultrasound screening in Greece.

Methods: The study was conducted between May 2019 and January 2020. Three hundred pregnant women >18 years of age with complete antenatal routine screening, were invited to participate. The questionnaire contained sociodemographic and obstetric history information and highlighted the background knowledge of pregnant women in prenatal screening.

Results: In this study, women with university or technological education mentioned in a greater proportion the importance of prenatal screening regarding prevention and treatment of intrauterine diseases. The belief that the pain or sorrow to give birth to a disabled child or one with a genetic disorder might lead parents to the decision to terminate the pregnancy, was supported more by women with a higher educational level.

Conclusion: Pregnant women place a great deal of trust in their physician, as a source of information for the fetal well-being. The majority consider prenatal testing mandatory for that matter. Finally, an association between women who abide with prenatal screening and their educational level was noted. Thus, it's more common women who have a higher educational level to seek prenatal screening, than those with lower education level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前超声筛查与女性期望:一项原创研究。
背景:产前筛查提供了关于怀孕的重要信息,尽管有时会带来伦理问题和孕妇潜在的困难决定。怀孕期间的超声筛查既特别重要,也是一项巨大的挑战。目的:本研究的目的是评估妇女的知识和期望有关产前超声筛查在希腊。方法:研究时间为2019年5月至2020年1月。邀请300名18岁以上的孕妇进行完整的产前常规筛查。问卷包含社会人口学和产科史信息,突出孕妇产前筛查的背景知识。结果:在这项研究中,受过大学或技术教育的妇女较多地提到产前筛查对预防和治疗宫内疾病的重要性。有一种观点认为,生下残疾儿童或患有遗传性疾病的孩子的痛苦或悲伤可能会导致父母决定终止妊娠,这种观点得到了受教育程度较高的女性的更多支持。结论:孕妇非常信任她们的医生,将其作为胎儿健康信息的来源。大多数人认为产前检查是强制性的。最后,注意到接受产前检查的妇女与其受教育程度之间的联系。因此,与受教育程度较低的女性相比,受教育程度较高的女性更容易进行产前筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Pediatric Intensive Care Professionals. The Evaluation of Intestinal Permeability in Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Acquisition of New Philips Affiniti 30 Vascular Color Doppler Ultrasound Device - Cost Benefit Analysis to Reduce Cardiosurgical Patients' Treatment. Behavioral and Knowledge Patterns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics Among Urban and Rural Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina-a Cross-sectional Study. Domestic Violence During Women's Life in Developing Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1