Ethical considerations in using a smartphone-based GPS app to understand linkages between mobility patterns and health outcomes: The example of HIV risk among mobile youth in rural South Africa

Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12376
Thulile Mathenjwa, Busi Nkosi, Hae-Young Kim, Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Frank Tanser, Douglas Wassenaar
{"title":"Ethical considerations in using a smartphone-based GPS app to understand linkages between mobility patterns and health outcomes: The example of HIV risk among mobile youth in rural South Africa","authors":"Thulile Mathenjwa,&nbsp;Busi Nkosi,&nbsp;Hae-Young Kim,&nbsp;Luchuo Engelbert Bain,&nbsp;Frank Tanser,&nbsp;Douglas Wassenaar","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smartphones with Global Positioning System (GPS) apps offer simple and accurate tools to collect data on human mobility. However, their associated ethical challenges remain to be assessed. We used the Emanuel framework to assess the ethical concerns of using smartphone GPS to record mobility patterns of young adults in rural South Africa for a larger study on mobility and HIV risk (Sesikhona). We conducted four focus groups (FGDs) with individuals eligible for the Sesikhona study. FGD data were coded using the Emanuel framework. Participants perceived use of smartphone GPS to study human mobility and HIV risk as valuable. They raised concerns about invasion of privacy and confidentiality. Also mentioned were risk/benefit ratio, informed consent and ongoing respect. Concerns expressed provided a useful evidence-base for the development of a guide to inform future participants about ethical issues arising in the use of GPS technology to track mobility and health-related issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dewb.12376","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Smartphones with Global Positioning System (GPS) apps offer simple and accurate tools to collect data on human mobility. However, their associated ethical challenges remain to be assessed. We used the Emanuel framework to assess the ethical concerns of using smartphone GPS to record mobility patterns of young adults in rural South Africa for a larger study on mobility and HIV risk (Sesikhona). We conducted four focus groups (FGDs) with individuals eligible for the Sesikhona study. FGD data were coded using the Emanuel framework. Participants perceived use of smartphone GPS to study human mobility and HIV risk as valuable. They raised concerns about invasion of privacy and confidentiality. Also mentioned were risk/benefit ratio, informed consent and ongoing respect. Concerns expressed provided a useful evidence-base for the development of a guide to inform future participants about ethical issues arising in the use of GPS technology to track mobility and health-related issues.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
使用基于智能手机的 GPS 应用程序了解流动模式与健康结果之间的联系时的伦理考虑:以南非农村流动青年的艾滋病毒风险为例
装有全球定位系统(GPS)应用程序的智能手机为收集人类移动数据提供了简单而准确的工具。然而,与之相关的伦理挑战仍有待评估。我们使用伊曼纽尔框架来评估使用智能手机全球定位系统记录南非农村青壮年流动模式的伦理问题,以便开展一项关于流动性和艾滋病风险的大型研究(Sesikhona)。我们对符合 Sesikhona 研究条件的个人进行了四次焦点小组讨论(FGD)。我们使用伊曼纽尔框架对 FGD 数据进行了编码。参与者认为使用智能手机 GPS 研究人员流动性和 HIV 风险很有价值。他们对侵犯隐私和保密性表示担忧。他们还提到了风险/收益比、知情同意和持续尊重。所表达的关切为制定指南提供了有用的证据基础,使未来的参与者了解在使用全球定位系统技术跟踪流动性和健康相关问题时出现的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1