A comparison between high dose rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy boost after elective pelvic irradiation for high and very high-risk prostate cancer.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-30 DOI:10.3857/roj.2022.00339
Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov, Roman Vladimirovich Novikov, Yurii Olegovich Merezhko, Mariya Yurevna Gotovchikova, Nikolai Dmitrievich Ilin, Yulia Sergeevna Melnik, Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev
{"title":"A comparison between high dose rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy boost after elective pelvic irradiation for high and very high-risk prostate cancer.","authors":"Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov,&nbsp;Roman Vladimirovich Novikov,&nbsp;Yurii Olegovich Merezhko,&nbsp;Mariya Yurevna Gotovchikova,&nbsp;Nikolai Dmitrievich Ilin,&nbsp;Yulia Sergeevna Melnik,&nbsp;Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev","doi":"10.3857/roj.2022.00339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and toxicity outcomes of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost after elective nodal irradiation for high/very high-risk prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>a retrospective analysis was performed in 149 male. In 98 patients, the boost to the prostate was delivered by HDRB as 2 fractions of 10 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 66 Gy) or 1 fraction of 15 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 71 Gy). In 51 male, SBRT was used for the boost delivery (3 fractions of 7 Gy; EQD2Gy for α/β = 1.5; 51 Gy) because brachytherapy equipment was out of order.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 98 patients that received HDRB boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS were 74.6% and 66.8%. Late grade-II genitourinary toxicity was detected in 27, grade-III in 1 case. Grade-II (maximum) rectal toxicity was diagnosed in nine patients. For 51 male patients that received SBRT boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS was 76.5% and 67.7%. Late grade-II (maximum) genitourinary toxicity was detected in five cases, late grade-II rectal toxicity in four cases. Other three patients developed late grade-III-IV rectal toxicity that required diverting colostomy. SBRT boost was associated with higher maximum dose to 2 cm3 of anterior rectal wall (D2cm³rectum) compared to HDRB: 92% versus 55% of dose to prostate. Severe rectal toxicity was negligible at EQD2 D2cm³rectum <85 Gy and EQD2 D5cm³ rectum <75 Gy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate similar 3- and 5-year BRFS in patients with high/very high-risk prostate cancer who received HDRB or SBRT boost, but SBRT boost is associated with higher rate of severe late rectal toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":"40 3","pages":"200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/65/roj-2022-00339.PMC9535414.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2022.00339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To compare biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and toxicity outcomes of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost after elective nodal irradiation for high/very high-risk prostate cancer.

Materials and methods: a retrospective analysis was performed in 149 male. In 98 patients, the boost to the prostate was delivered by HDRB as 2 fractions of 10 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 66 Gy) or 1 fraction of 15 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 71 Gy). In 51 male, SBRT was used for the boost delivery (3 fractions of 7 Gy; EQD2Gy for α/β = 1.5; 51 Gy) because brachytherapy equipment was out of order.

Results: In 98 patients that received HDRB boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS were 74.6% and 66.8%. Late grade-II genitourinary toxicity was detected in 27, grade-III in 1 case. Grade-II (maximum) rectal toxicity was diagnosed in nine patients. For 51 male patients that received SBRT boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS was 76.5% and 67.7%. Late grade-II (maximum) genitourinary toxicity was detected in five cases, late grade-II rectal toxicity in four cases. Other three patients developed late grade-III-IV rectal toxicity that required diverting colostomy. SBRT boost was associated with higher maximum dose to 2 cm3 of anterior rectal wall (D2cm³rectum) compared to HDRB: 92% versus 55% of dose to prostate. Severe rectal toxicity was negligible at EQD2 D2cm³rectum <85 Gy and EQD2 D5cm³ rectum <75 Gy.

Conclusion: Our results indicate similar 3- and 5-year BRFS in patients with high/very high-risk prostate cancer who received HDRB or SBRT boost, but SBRT boost is associated with higher rate of severe late rectal toxicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高、高危前列腺癌择期骨盆照射后高剂量率近距离放疗与立体定向放射治疗的比较。
目的:比较高剂量率近距离放疗(HDRB)和立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)在选择性淋巴结照射后的生化无复发生存(BRFS)和毒性结果。材料与方法:对149例男性患者进行回顾性分析。在98例患者中,HDRB对前列腺的促进作用分为10 Gy的2份(EQD2对α/β = 1.5;66 Gy)或15 Gy的1分之一(EQD2对于α/β = 1.5;71 Gy)。在51名男性中,SBRT用于增强输送(7 Gy的3个分数;EQD2Gy为α/β = 1.5;51 Gy),因为近距离治疗设备出了故障。结果:在接受HDRB增强的98例患者中,3年和5年BRFS分别为74.6%和66.8%。晚期ii级泌尿生殖系统毒性27例,iii级1例。9例患者被诊断为ii级(最大)直肠毒性。51例接受SBRT强化治疗的男性患者,3年和5年的BRFS分别为76.5%和67.7%。5例检测到晚期ii级(最大)泌尿生殖系统毒性,4例检测到晚期ii级直肠毒性。其他3例患者出现晚期iii - iv级直肠毒性,需要转移结肠造口术。与HDRB相比,SBRT增强与直肠前壁2 cm3 (D2cm³直肠)的最大剂量相关:92%对前列腺剂量的55%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,接受HDRB或SBRT增强的高/高危前列腺癌患者的3年和5年BRFS相似,但SBRT增强与较高的严重晚期直肠毒性发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response Target movement according to cervical lymph node level in head and neck cancer and its clinical significance Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1