Learning and unlearning: Settler engagements in long-term Indigenous-settler alliances in Canada.

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicities Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-22 DOI:10.1177/14687968211063911
Lynne Davis, Jeffrey S Denis, Chris Hiller, Dawn Lavell-Harvard
{"title":"Learning and unlearning: Settler engagements in long-term Indigenous-settler alliances in Canada.","authors":"Lynne Davis,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Denis,&nbsp;Chris Hiller,&nbsp;Dawn Lavell-Harvard","doi":"10.1177/14687968211063911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on three cases of long-term Indigenous-settler alliances in Canada, this research investigates the roles and contributions of settlers towards decolonization. As a multidisciplinary team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, our research goal has been to understand how such alliances endure and change over time, and how they negotiate power dynamics, tensions and changes, within a settler colonial context. Taking a comparative case study approach, and analysing interviews, sharing circles and archival documents, we focus here on the lessons that alliance participants have learned from their activist experiences about settler roles and responsibilities. The three cases include (1) The Right to Belong: Indigenous women's organizing and the struggle to eliminate sex discrimination in the Indian Act; (2) Shoal Lake 40 First Nation's Freedom Road campaign to end a century of state-imposed geographic isolation and to secure access to safe drinking water; and (3) the alliance-building and solidarity activism of Canadian ecumenical social justice coalitions now under the umbrella of KAIROS Canada. While none of these campaigns alone equates to decolonization in the sense of land return and Indigenous sovereignty, each has helped create the conditions, relationships and transformations in settler consciousness that may provide the ground for decolonization. Taken together, the three case studies illustrate the contingent environments in which alliances are forged and the ways in which settlers take up particular responsibilities based on Indigenous-defined goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47512,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/c1/10.1177_14687968211063911.PMC9527442.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968211063911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Drawing on three cases of long-term Indigenous-settler alliances in Canada, this research investigates the roles and contributions of settlers towards decolonization. As a multidisciplinary team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, our research goal has been to understand how such alliances endure and change over time, and how they negotiate power dynamics, tensions and changes, within a settler colonial context. Taking a comparative case study approach, and analysing interviews, sharing circles and archival documents, we focus here on the lessons that alliance participants have learned from their activist experiences about settler roles and responsibilities. The three cases include (1) The Right to Belong: Indigenous women's organizing and the struggle to eliminate sex discrimination in the Indian Act; (2) Shoal Lake 40 First Nation's Freedom Road campaign to end a century of state-imposed geographic isolation and to secure access to safe drinking water; and (3) the alliance-building and solidarity activism of Canadian ecumenical social justice coalitions now under the umbrella of KAIROS Canada. While none of these campaigns alone equates to decolonization in the sense of land return and Indigenous sovereignty, each has helped create the conditions, relationships and transformations in settler consciousness that may provide the ground for decolonization. Taken together, the three case studies illustrate the contingent environments in which alliances are forged and the ways in which settlers take up particular responsibilities based on Indigenous-defined goals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习与忘却:加拿大原住民与移民长期联盟中的移民参与。
本研究以加拿大原住民与移民者长期结盟的三个案例为例,探讨移民者在非殖民化过程中的角色与贡献。作为一个由土著和非土著学者组成的多学科团队,我们的研究目标是了解这种联盟如何随着时间的推移而持续和变化,以及他们如何在定居者殖民背景下谈判权力动态、紧张局势和变化。采用比较案例研究方法,分析访谈,分享圈子和档案文件,我们在这里重点关注联盟参与者从他们关于定居者角色和责任的活动家经验中学到的教训。这三个案例包括:(1)归属权:土著妇女在《印第安人法案》中为消除性别歧视而组织和斗争;(2) Shoal Lake 40 First Nation的自由之路运动,结束了一个世纪以来国家强加的地理隔离,并确保获得安全饮用水;(3)现在在KAIROS Canada的保护伞下的加拿大普世社会正义联盟的联盟建设和团结行动。虽然在归还土地和土著主权的意义上,这些运动都不等于非殖民化,但每一项运动都有助于在定居者的意识中创造可能为非殖民化提供基础的条件、关系和转变。综上所述,这三个案例研究说明了建立联盟的偶然环境,以及定居者根据土著定义的目标承担特定责任的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicities
Ethnicities ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: There is currently a burgeoning interest in both sociology and politics around questions of ethnicity, nationalism and related issues such as identity politics and minority rights. Ethnicities is a cross-disciplinary journal that will provide a critical dialogue between these debates in sociology and politics, and related disciplines. Ethnicities has three broad aims, each of which adds a new and distinctive dimension to the academic analysis of ethnicity, nationalism, identity politics and minority rights.
期刊最新文献
Forgotten responsibilities? Nordic truth commissions, Sámi history, and the difficulty of transnational perspectives on historical responsibility Multicultural conversations: The nature and future of culture, identity and nationalism Linguistic landscape as a tool of identity negotiation: The case of the Nepali ethnic communities in West Bengal Discrimination and rights in German naturalization policy Who counts? Anti-antisemitism and the racial politics of emotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1