Quantitative Characterization of the Smoothness of Extended-release Methylphenidate Pharmacokinetic Profiles.

Q3 Medicine Innovations in clinical neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-07-01
Michelle D Po, Roberto Gomeni, Bev Incledon
{"title":"Quantitative Characterization of the Smoothness of Extended-release Methylphenidate Pharmacokinetic Profiles.","authors":"Michelle D Po,&nbsp;Roberto Gomeni,&nbsp;Bev Incledon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extended-release methylphenidate (ER-MPH) formulations used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have complex pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, resulting from differing ratios of immediate-release and extended-release components and/or their site of absorption. This study aimed to evaluate the smoothness of PK curves of ER-MPHs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The integral of the second derivative squared was evaluated for modeled PK curves, with smaller values indicating a smoother curve. The calculated smoothness of each PK curve was normalized by dividing by Cmax 2 to derive a normalized smoothness parameter appropriate across the dose range of each formulation. Calculations used modeled PK curves from 100mg delayed-release and ER-MPH (DR/ER-MPH), 54mg osmotic release oral system MPH (OROS MPH), 60mg MPH controlled-release delivery (MPH CD), 60mg ER-MPH oral suspension (MEROS), 20mg ER dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH ER), and 60mg multilayer-release MPH (MLR-MPH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cmax2-normalized smoothness value was consistent across DR/ER-MPH doses, allowing for relevant comparisons across formulations. Normalized smoothness values differed widely; the lowest normalized smoothness was 0.05 with DR/ER-MPH and ranged up to 9.56 with d-MPH ER.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DR/ER-MPH demonstrated a smoother PK profile compared to the highest dose of other ER-MPH formulations. While the benefits of a smooth PK profile remain to be tested clinically, having fewer peaks and troughs has been hypothesized to reduce waxing and waning of therapeutic effects throughout the day, and more gradual changes in MPH plasma levels have been hypothesized to lower the risk of likeability and potentially abate afternoon symptom rebound.</p>","PeriodicalId":13635,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","volume":"19 7-9","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507140/pdf/icns_19_7-9_32.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Extended-release methylphenidate (ER-MPH) formulations used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have complex pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, resulting from differing ratios of immediate-release and extended-release components and/or their site of absorption. This study aimed to evaluate the smoothness of PK curves of ER-MPHs.

Design: The integral of the second derivative squared was evaluated for modeled PK curves, with smaller values indicating a smoother curve. The calculated smoothness of each PK curve was normalized by dividing by Cmax 2 to derive a normalized smoothness parameter appropriate across the dose range of each formulation. Calculations used modeled PK curves from 100mg delayed-release and ER-MPH (DR/ER-MPH), 54mg osmotic release oral system MPH (OROS MPH), 60mg MPH controlled-release delivery (MPH CD), 60mg ER-MPH oral suspension (MEROS), 20mg ER dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH ER), and 60mg multilayer-release MPH (MLR-MPH).

Results: The Cmax2-normalized smoothness value was consistent across DR/ER-MPH doses, allowing for relevant comparisons across formulations. Normalized smoothness values differed widely; the lowest normalized smoothness was 0.05 with DR/ER-MPH and ranged up to 9.56 with d-MPH ER.

Conclusion: DR/ER-MPH demonstrated a smoother PK profile compared to the highest dose of other ER-MPH formulations. While the benefits of a smooth PK profile remain to be tested clinically, having fewer peaks and troughs has been hypothesized to reduce waxing and waning of therapeutic effects throughout the day, and more gradual changes in MPH plasma levels have been hypothesized to lower the risk of likeability and potentially abate afternoon symptom rebound.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哌甲酯缓释药动学曲线平稳性的定量表征。
目的:用于治疗注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的缓释哌醋甲酯(ER-MPH)制剂具有复杂的药代动力学(PK)谱,这是由速释和缓释成分的不同比例和/或其吸收部位造成的。本研究旨在评价er - mph的PK曲线的平稳性。设计:对建模的PK曲线求二阶导数平方的积分,值越小表示曲线越光滑。将计算得到的每条PK曲线的平滑度除以Cmax 2归一化,得到适合于每种制剂剂量范围的归一化平滑度参数。使用100mg缓释和ER-MPH (DR/ER-MPH)、54mg渗透释放口服系统MPH (OROS MPH)、60mg MPH控释递送(MPH CD)、60mg ER-MPH口服混悬液(MEROS)、20mg ER右甲基哌醋酯(d-MPH ER)和60mg多层释放MPH (MLR-MPH)的模型PK曲线进行计算。结果:cmax2标准化平滑值在DR/ER-MPH剂量之间是一致的,允许在配方之间进行相关比较。归一化平滑度值差异很大;DR/ER- mph的归一化平滑度最低为0.05,d-MPH的归一化平滑度最高为9.56。结论:与其他最高剂量ER-MPH制剂相比,DR/ER-MPH表现出更平滑的PK曲线。虽然平稳的PK谱的好处仍有待临床测试,但假设较少的波峰和波谷可以减少全天治疗效果的起伏,并且假设MPH血浆水平的更渐进变化可以降低受欢迎的风险,并可能减轻下午症状反弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Innovations in clinical neuroscience
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊最新文献
Activation of the serotonergic neurotransmission is a double-edged sword in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome. Literary Prescriptions: Applying Bibliotherapy in a Psychotherapeutic Context. Neuropsychological Functioning Among Patients with OCD in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review. Overview of Psychiatric Medications in the Pipeline in Phase III Trials as of June 1, 2024: A Systematic Review. Risk Management: Fires, Floods, Hurricanes, Oh My! The Importance of Disaster Planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1