Clinical Validation of the Covariates Pharmacokinetic Model for Propofol in an Adult Population.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s40268-022-00404-4
Christopher Hawthorne, Martin Shaw, Ruaraidh Campbell, Nicholas Sutcliffe, Shiona McKelvie, Stefan Schraag
{"title":"Clinical Validation of the Covariates Pharmacokinetic Model for Propofol in an Adult Population.","authors":"Christopher Hawthorne,&nbsp;Martin Shaw,&nbsp;Ruaraidh Campbell,&nbsp;Nicholas Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Shiona McKelvie,&nbsp;Stefan Schraag","doi":"10.1007/s40268-022-00404-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pharmacokinetic or pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models have been instrumental in facilitating the clinical use of propofol in target-controlled infusion systems in anaesthetic practice. There has been debate over which model should be recommended for practice. The covariates model is an updated pharmacokinetic model for propofol. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate this model in an adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included, with a range of ages to assess model performance in younger and older individuals. Subjects received propofol through a target-controlled infusion device programmed with the covariates model. Subjects were randomised to one of two increasing/decreasing regimes of propofol plasma target concentrations between 2 and 5 μg.mL<sup>-1</sup>. After the start of the infusion, arterial and venous blood samples were drawn at pre-specified timepoints between 1.5 and 20 min and between 1.5 and 45 min, respectively. Predictive performance was assessed using established methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved a bias of 9 (- 45 to 82) and precision of 24 (9-82) for arterial samples and bias of - 8 (- 64 to 70) and precision of 23 (9-70) for venous samples. Predicted concentrations tended to be higher than the measured concentrations in female individuals but lower in male individuals. There was no clear systematic difference in the bias between younger and older patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The covariates propofol pharmacokinetic model achieved an acceptable level of predictive performance, as assessed by both arterial and venous sampling, for use in target-controlled infusion in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT01492712 (15 December, 2011).</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":"22 4","pages":"289-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/4e/40268_2022_Article_404.PMC9700536.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-022-00404-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models have been instrumental in facilitating the clinical use of propofol in target-controlled infusion systems in anaesthetic practice. There has been debate over which model should be recommended for practice. The covariates model is an updated pharmacokinetic model for propofol. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate this model in an adult population.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients were included, with a range of ages to assess model performance in younger and older individuals. Subjects received propofol through a target-controlled infusion device programmed with the covariates model. Subjects were randomised to one of two increasing/decreasing regimes of propofol plasma target concentrations between 2 and 5 μg.mL-1. After the start of the infusion, arterial and venous blood samples were drawn at pre-specified timepoints between 1.5 and 20 min and between 1.5 and 45 min, respectively. Predictive performance was assessed using established methodology.

Results: The model achieved a bias of 9 (- 45 to 82) and precision of 24 (9-82) for arterial samples and bias of - 8 (- 64 to 70) and precision of 23 (9-70) for venous samples. Predicted concentrations tended to be higher than the measured concentrations in female individuals but lower in male individuals. There was no clear systematic difference in the bias between younger and older patients.

Conclusions: The covariates propofol pharmacokinetic model achieved an acceptable level of predictive performance, as assessed by both arterial and venous sampling, for use in target-controlled infusion in clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01492712 (15 December, 2011).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人异丙酚协变量药代动力学模型的临床验证。
背景和目的:在麻醉实践中,药代动力学或药代动力学-药效学模型有助于促进异丙酚在靶控输注系统中的临床应用。对于哪种模式应该被推荐用于实践一直存在争议。协变量模型是一种更新的异丙酚药代动力学模型。本研究的目的是在成年人群中前瞻性地验证该模型。方法:纳入29例患者,年龄范围不同,以评估年轻人和老年人的模型性能。受试者通过用协变量模型编程的靶控输注装置接受异丙酚。受试者被随机分为两组,丙泊酚血浆靶浓度在2 ~ 5 μg.mL-1之间增加/减少。开始注射后,在预先设定的时间点分别在1.5 ~ 20min和1.5 ~ 45min抽取动脉和静脉血。使用既定的方法评估预测性能。结果:该模型对动脉样本的偏差为9(- 45至82),精度为24(9-82),对静脉样本的偏差为-8(- 64至70),精度为23(9-70)。在雌性个体中,预测浓度往往高于测量浓度,而在雄性个体中则低于测量浓度。在年轻患者和老年患者之间没有明显的系统性差异。结论:经动脉和静脉取样评估,协变量异丙酚药代动力学模型达到了可接受水平的预测性能,可用于临床实践中的靶标控制输注。临床试验注册:NCT01492712(2011年12月15日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
期刊最新文献
In-Use Physicochemical Stability of Sandoz Rituximab Biosimilar in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution After Prolonged Storage at Room Temperature Conditions. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, Following Subcutaneous Administration of a Lyophilized Powder Formulation in Healthy Volunteers. Bioequivalence Analysis of Ondansetron Hydrochloride Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Phase I Study. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Powders of Azithromycin for Suspension: A Nonblinded, Single-Dose, Randomized, Three-Way Crossover Study in Fed and Fasting States Among Healthy Chinese Volunteers. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Intravenous Efgartigimod and Subcutaneous Efgartigimod PH20 in Healthy Chinese Participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1