How Chronological Age, Theory of Mind, and Yield are Interrelated to Memory and Suggestion in Young Children.

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Spanish Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1017/SJP.2022.22
Nieves Pérez-Mata, Amparo Moreno, Margarita Diges, Miriam Peláez
{"title":"How Chronological Age, Theory of Mind, and Yield are Interrelated to Memory and Suggestion in Young Children.","authors":"Nieves Pérez-Mata,&nbsp;Amparo Moreno,&nbsp;Margarita Diges,&nbsp;Miriam Peláez","doi":"10.1017/SJP.2022.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the interrelations between chronological age, theory of mind (ToM), Yield (as a measure of individual suggestibility), memory and acceptance of experimental suggestion in a sample of children between 3 and 7 years old (<i>N</i> = 106). One week after participants interacted with 'a Teacher', they were asked to recall activities carried out with the Teacher (direct experience) and the contents of a story read to them by the Teacher (indirect experience). Data were examined with an analysis of developmental trajectories, which allows establishing the predictor value of socio-cognitive developmental factors regardless of participants' chronological age. It also estimates predictor values in interaction with the age and determines whether age is the best predictor for performance. As in previous research, results showed that chronological age was the main predictor of memory performance, both for direct experience (i.e., activities performed) and indirect experience (i.e., contents of the story). However, ToM and Yield, together with participants' ages, modulated their acceptance of the external suggestions received (presented only once, one week after the event). A turning point was observed at age 4.6. Below this age, the greater the mentalist skills (higher ToM), the lower was the vulnerability to external suggestion. Still, children below this age characterized individually as being suggestible (Yield medium or high) were more vulnerable to suggestion the younger they were. Thus, developmental socio-cognitive factors might modulate young children's vulnerability to external suggestions, even if received only once.</p>","PeriodicalId":54309,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2022.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the interrelations between chronological age, theory of mind (ToM), Yield (as a measure of individual suggestibility), memory and acceptance of experimental suggestion in a sample of children between 3 and 7 years old (N = 106). One week after participants interacted with 'a Teacher', they were asked to recall activities carried out with the Teacher (direct experience) and the contents of a story read to them by the Teacher (indirect experience). Data were examined with an analysis of developmental trajectories, which allows establishing the predictor value of socio-cognitive developmental factors regardless of participants' chronological age. It also estimates predictor values in interaction with the age and determines whether age is the best predictor for performance. As in previous research, results showed that chronological age was the main predictor of memory performance, both for direct experience (i.e., activities performed) and indirect experience (i.e., contents of the story). However, ToM and Yield, together with participants' ages, modulated their acceptance of the external suggestions received (presented only once, one week after the event). A turning point was observed at age 4.6. Below this age, the greater the mentalist skills (higher ToM), the lower was the vulnerability to external suggestion. Still, children below this age characterized individually as being suggestible (Yield medium or high) were more vulnerable to suggestion the younger they were. Thus, developmental socio-cognitive factors might modulate young children's vulnerability to external suggestions, even if received only once.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿的实足年龄、心理理论和屈服与记忆和暗示的关系。
我们调查了3 - 7岁儿童(N = 106)的实足年龄、心理理论(ToM)、屈服(作为个体易受暗示的衡量标准)、记忆和接受实验暗示之间的相互关系。在参与者与“老师”互动一周后,他们被要求回忆与老师一起进行的活动(直接体验)和老师给他们读的故事内容(间接体验)。研究人员对数据进行了发展轨迹分析,以确定社会认知发展因素的预测值,而不考虑参与者的实际年龄。它还估计了与年龄相互作用的预测值,并确定年龄是否是表现的最佳预测值。和之前的研究一样,结果表明,实足年龄是记忆表现的主要预测因素,无论是直接经验(即所做的活动)还是间接经验(即故事内容)。然而,ToM和Yield,连同参与者的年龄,调整了他们对收到的外部建议的接受程度(只提供一次,活动后一周)。转折点出现在4.6岁。低于这个年龄,心理技能越高(ToM越高),对外部暗示的脆弱性越低。然而,低于这个年龄的孩子在个体上被认为是易受暗示的(产量中等或高),他们越年轻就越容易受到暗示的影响。因此,发展的社会认知因素可能会调节幼儿对外部建议的脆弱性,即使只收到一次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Psychology
Spanish Journal of Psychology Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychology is published with the aim of promoting the international dissemination of relevant empirical research and theoretical and methodological proposals in the various areas of specialization within psychology. The first Spanish journal with an international scope published entirely in English.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Comorbidity Between Anxiety and Depression in Spanish-Speaking School-Aged Children: A Network Analysis Approach. Athlete Portraits in News: Influence of Media Representation and Gender on Social Perception. Building Employee Engagement and Resilience Through Strengths-Based Leadership. Prevention of Emotional Problems in Spanish Schoolchildren: Effectiveness of the Super Skills Multimedia Program to Promote Social-Emotional Skills. Cognitive Function of Climbers: An Exploratory Study of Working Memory and Climbing Performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1