Radiological Findings in SARS-CoV-2 Viral Pneumonia Compared to Other Viral Pneumonias: A Single-Centre Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology Pub Date : 2022-09-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2826524
Rana Günöz Cömert, Eda Cingöz, Sevim Meşe, Görkem Durak, Atadan Tunaci, Ali Ağaçfidan, Mustafa Önel, Şükrü Mehmet Ertürk
{"title":"Radiological Findings in SARS-CoV-2 Viral Pneumonia Compared to Other Viral Pneumonias: A Single-Centre Study.","authors":"Rana Günöz Cömert,&nbsp;Eda Cingöz,&nbsp;Sevim Meşe,&nbsp;Görkem Durak,&nbsp;Atadan Tunaci,&nbsp;Ali Ağaçfidan,&nbsp;Mustafa Önel,&nbsp;Şükrü Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.1155/2022/2826524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thorax computed tomography (CT) imaging is widely used as a diagnostic method in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia. Radiological differential diagnosis and isolation of other viral agents causing pneumonia in patients have gained importance, particularly during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between CT images from patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia compared to CT images of patients with pneumonia due to other viral agents and which finding may be more effective in diagnosis. <i>Study Design</i>. The study included 249 adult patients with pneumonia identified by thorax CT examination and with a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test compared to 94 patients diagnosed with non-COVID-19 pneumonia (viral PCR positive but no bacterial or fungal agents detected in other cultures) between 2015 and 2019. CT images were retrospectively analyzed using the PACS system. CT findings were evaluated by two radiologists with 5 and 20 years of experience, in a blinded fashion, and the outcome was decided by consensus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic data (age, gender, and known chronic disease) and CT imaging findings (percentage of involvement, number of lesions, distribution preference, dominant pattern, ground-glass opacity distribution pattern, nodule, tree in bud sign, interstitial changes, crazy paving sign, reversed halo sign, vacuolar sign, halo sign, vascular enlargement, linear opacities, traction bronchiectasis, peribronchial wall thickness, air trapping, pleural retraction, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, cavitation, mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy, dominant lesion size, consolidation, subpleural curvilinear opacities, air bronchogram, and pleural thickening) of the patients were evaluated. CT findings were also evaluated with the RSNA consensus guideline and the CORADS scoring system. Data were divided into two main groups-non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pneumonia-and compared statistically with chi-squared tests and multiple regression analysis of independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSNA and CORADS classifications of CT scan images were able to successfully differentiate between positive and negative COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Statistically significant differences were found between the two patient groups in various categories including the percentage of involvement, number of lesions, distribution preference, dominant pattern, nodule, tree in bud, interstitial changes, crazy paving, reverse halo vascular enlargement, peribronchial wall thickness, air trapping, pleural retraction, pleural/pericardial effusion, cavitation, and mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis of independent variables found a significant effect in reverse halo sign (<i>β</i> = 0.097, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and pleural effusion (<i>β</i> = 10.631, <i>p</i> < 0.05) on COVID-19 pneumonia patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of reverse halo and absence of pleural effusion was found to be characteristic of COVID-19 pneumonia and therefore a reliable diagnostic tool to differentiate it from non-COVID-19 pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536981/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2826524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Thorax computed tomography (CT) imaging is widely used as a diagnostic method in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia. Radiological differential diagnosis and isolation of other viral agents causing pneumonia in patients have gained importance, particularly during the pandemic.

Aims: We aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between CT images from patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia compared to CT images of patients with pneumonia due to other viral agents and which finding may be more effective in diagnosis. Study Design. The study included 249 adult patients with pneumonia identified by thorax CT examination and with a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test compared to 94 patients diagnosed with non-COVID-19 pneumonia (viral PCR positive but no bacterial or fungal agents detected in other cultures) between 2015 and 2019. CT images were retrospectively analyzed using the PACS system. CT findings were evaluated by two radiologists with 5 and 20 years of experience, in a blinded fashion, and the outcome was decided by consensus.

Methods: Demographic data (age, gender, and known chronic disease) and CT imaging findings (percentage of involvement, number of lesions, distribution preference, dominant pattern, ground-glass opacity distribution pattern, nodule, tree in bud sign, interstitial changes, crazy paving sign, reversed halo sign, vacuolar sign, halo sign, vascular enlargement, linear opacities, traction bronchiectasis, peribronchial wall thickness, air trapping, pleural retraction, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, cavitation, mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy, dominant lesion size, consolidation, subpleural curvilinear opacities, air bronchogram, and pleural thickening) of the patients were evaluated. CT findings were also evaluated with the RSNA consensus guideline and the CORADS scoring system. Data were divided into two main groups-non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pneumonia-and compared statistically with chi-squared tests and multiple regression analysis of independent variables.

Results: RSNA and CORADS classifications of CT scan images were able to successfully differentiate between positive and negative COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Statistically significant differences were found between the two patient groups in various categories including the percentage of involvement, number of lesions, distribution preference, dominant pattern, nodule, tree in bud, interstitial changes, crazy paving, reverse halo vascular enlargement, peribronchial wall thickness, air trapping, pleural retraction, pleural/pericardial effusion, cavitation, and mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis of independent variables found a significant effect in reverse halo sign (β = 0.097, p < 0.05) and pleural effusion (β = 10.631, p < 0.05) on COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

Conclusion: The presence of reverse halo and absence of pleural effusion was found to be characteristic of COVID-19 pneumonia and therefore a reliable diagnostic tool to differentiate it from non-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2病毒性肺炎与其他病毒性肺炎的影像学表现:一项单中心研究
背景:胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)作为一种诊断方法被广泛应用于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关肺炎的诊断。放射鉴别诊断和隔离引起患者肺炎的其他病毒制剂已变得非常重要,特别是在大流行期间。目的:我们旨在探讨covid -19相关性肺炎患者的CT图像与其他病毒制剂所致肺炎患者的CT图像是否存在差异,以及哪种发现可能更有效地诊断。研究设计。该研究纳入了2015年至2019年期间通过胸部CT检查确诊的249名成年肺炎患者,其中COVID-19 RT-PCR检测呈阳性,而非COVID-19肺炎(病毒PCR阳性,但在其他培养中未检测到细菌或真菌)的患者为94名。采用PACS系统对CT图像进行回顾性分析。CT结果由两名分别有5年和20年经验的放射科医生以盲法评估,结果由共识决定。方法:人口统计学资料(年龄、性别、已知慢性疾病)及CT影像表现(受累百分比、病变数量、分布偏好、优势型、毛玻璃样混浊分布、结节、芽状树征、间质改变、铺路性紊乱征、反晕征、空泡征、晕征、血管扩张、线状混浊、牵引性支气管扩张、支气管周围壁增厚、气陷、胸膜缩回、胸膜积液、心包积液、评估患者的空化、纵隔/肺门淋巴结病变、显性病变大小、实变、胸膜下曲线形影、支气管充气征和胸膜增厚。CT表现也用RSNA共识指南和CORADS评分系统进行评估。将数据分为非COVID-19和COVID-19肺炎两组,采用卡方检验和自变量多元回归分析进行统计学比较。结果:CT扫描图像的RSNA和CORADS分类能够成功区分COVID-19阳性和阴性肺炎患者。两组患者在受累百分率、病变数量、分布偏好、优势形态、结节、芽状树、间质改变、疯狂铺路、逆晕血管扩张、支气管周围壁厚、气陷、胸膜回缩、胸膜/心包积液、空化、纵隔/肺门淋巴结病变等各类别差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。自变量多元线性回归分析发现,反晕征(β = 0.097, p < 0.05)和胸腔积液(β = 10.631, p < 0.05)对COVID-19肺炎患者有显著影响。结论:出现反晕、无胸腔积液是COVID-19肺炎的特征,是与非COVID-19肺炎鉴别的可靠诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Profile of Candida kefyr Isolated from Clinical Samples and Dairy Products. Characterization of Virulence Genotypes, Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, and Biofilm Synthesis in Salmonella spp Isolated from Foodborne Outbreaks. The Characteristic of Biofilm Formation in ESBL-Producing K. pneumoniae Isolates. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Hypervirulent and Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from ICU Respiratory Infections. Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales Infections in Chinese Elderly Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1