Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E) and normative values in a representative adult population sample

{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E) and normative values in a representative adult population sample","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Frontal Assessment Battery is a short bedside test used to assess executive functions (EF). The aims of the present study were, first, to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the Spanish version of the FAB (FAB-E) in a representative sample, and second, to establish cut-off points for impairment in executive function according to age and education level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 798 healthy Spanish adult subjects aged 19 to 91 participated in this study. Neuropsychological assessment of participants was conducted using the FAB-E, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Trail Making Test (TMT). We examined internal consistency, intraclass correlation, test-retest reliability, and concurrent and divergent validity. In addition, we established a cut-off point for detecting executive function impairment based on the 5th percentile by age group and education level.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis of the psychometric properties of the FAB-E showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.60), intraclass correlation (0.72), test-retest reliability (0.70) and concurrent and divergent validity between the TMT (<em>r</em> = −0.523), MMSE (<em>r</em> = 0.426) and the FAB-E. The cut-off points for each age group were 16 points for the ≤ 29 group, 15 points for the 30-39 group, 14 points for the 40-49 and 50-59 groups, 12 points for the 60-69 group, and 10 points for the ≥ 70 age group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The psychometric analysis showed that the FAB-E has good validity and reliability. Thus, FAB-E may be a helpful tool to evaluate EF in a healthy Spanish population. In addition, this study provides information on reference data that will be very valuable for clinicians and researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 8","pages":"Pages 694-700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Frontal Assessment Battery is a short bedside test used to assess executive functions (EF). The aims of the present study were, first, to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the Spanish version of the FAB (FAB-E) in a representative sample, and second, to establish cut-off points for impairment in executive function according to age and education level.

Methods

A sample of 798 healthy Spanish adult subjects aged 19 to 91 participated in this study. Neuropsychological assessment of participants was conducted using the FAB-E, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Trail Making Test (TMT). We examined internal consistency, intraclass correlation, test-retest reliability, and concurrent and divergent validity. In addition, we established a cut-off point for detecting executive function impairment based on the 5th percentile by age group and education level.

Results

The analysis of the psychometric properties of the FAB-E showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.60), intraclass correlation (0.72), test-retest reliability (0.70) and concurrent and divergent validity between the TMT (r = −0.523), MMSE (r = 0.426) and the FAB-E. The cut-off points for each age group were 16 points for the ≤ 29 group, 15 points for the 30-39 group, 14 points for the 40-49 and 50-59 groups, 12 points for the 60-69 group, and 10 points for the ≥ 70 age group.

Conclusions

The psychometric analysis showed that the FAB-E has good validity and reliability. Thus, FAB-E may be a helpful tool to evaluate EF in a healthy Spanish population. In addition, this study provides information on reference data that will be very valuable for clinicians and researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙文版前额叶评估测验(FAB-E)的心理测量特性和具有代表性的成人样本的标准值。
背景介绍额叶评估测试(Frontal Assessment Battery)是一种用于评估执行功能(EF)的简短床边测试。本研究的目的首先是评估西班牙版前额叶评估测验(FAB-E)在代表性样本中的心理测量学特性,其次是根据年龄和教育水平确定执行功能受损的临界点:方法:798 名年龄在 19 至 91 岁之间的西班牙健康成年受试者参与了这项研究。我们使用 FAB-E、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和寻迹测验(TMT)对受试者进行了神经心理学评估。我们考察了内部一致性、类内相关性、重测可靠性、并发效度和发散效度。此外,我们还根据不同年龄组和教育程度的第 5 百分位数确定了检测执行功能障碍的临界点:FAB-E的心理测量学特性分析表明,TMT(r = -0.523)、MMSE(r = 0.426)和FAB-E之间具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.60)、类内相关性(0.72)、测试-再测信度(0.70)以及并发和发散效度。各年龄组的分界点分别为:≤29 岁组 16 分,30-39 岁组 15 分,40-49 岁组和 50-59 岁组 14 分,60-69 岁组 12 分,≥70 岁组 10 分:心理测量分析表明,FAB-E 具有良好的有效性和可靠性。因此,FAB-E 可作为评估西班牙健康人群 EF 的有用工具。此外,这项研究还提供了参考数据信息,对临床医生和研究人员非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frequency and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic life events in patients with migraine. Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: A prospective study. Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: Epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Spain: a systematic review Functional outcomes of patients with NORSE and FIRES treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1