Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1177/08258597221131658
A Bérubé, D Tapp, S Dupéré, A Plaisance, G Bravo, J Downar, V Couture
{"title":"Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"A Bérubé, D Tapp, S Dupéré, A Plaisance, G Bravo, J Downar, V Couture","doi":"10.1177/08258597221131658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAccess to palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care might be influenced by knowledge, attitudes, and representations of these practices. Socioeconomic factors might then affect what people know about EOL care practices, and how they perceive them. This study aims to compare knowledge, attitudes, and representations regarding EOL practices including assisted suicide, medical assistance in dying, and continuous palliative sedation of adults, according to socioeconomic variables.MethodsA cross-sectional community-based questionnaire study featuring two evolving vignettes and five end-of-life practices was conducted in Quebec, Canada. Three sample subgroups were created according to the participants' perceived financial situation and three according to educational attainment. Descriptive analysis was used to compare levels of knowledge, attitudes, and representations between the subgroups.ResultsNine hundred sixty-six (966) people completed the questionnaire. Two hundred and seventy participants (28.7%) had a high school diploma or less, and 42 participants (4.4%) were facing financial hardship. The majority of respondents supported all end-of-life options and the loosening of eligibility requirements for medical assistance in dying. Differences between subgroups were minor. While respondents in socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroups had less knowledge about EOL practices, those with lower educational attainment were more likely to be in favor of medical assistance in dying, and less likely to favor continuous palliative sedation.ConclusionsPeople living with situational social and economic vulnerabilities face multiple barriers in accessing health care. While they may have poorer knowledge about EOL practices, they have a positive attitude towards medical assistance in dying and assisted suicide, and a negative attitude towards continuous palliative sedation. This highlights the need for future research and interventions aimed at empowering this population and enhancing their access to EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221131658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveAccess to palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care might be influenced by knowledge, attitudes, and representations of these practices. Socioeconomic factors might then affect what people know about EOL care practices, and how they perceive them. This study aims to compare knowledge, attitudes, and representations regarding EOL practices including assisted suicide, medical assistance in dying, and continuous palliative sedation of adults, according to socioeconomic variables.MethodsA cross-sectional community-based questionnaire study featuring two evolving vignettes and five end-of-life practices was conducted in Quebec, Canada. Three sample subgroups were created according to the participants' perceived financial situation and three according to educational attainment. Descriptive analysis was used to compare levels of knowledge, attitudes, and representations between the subgroups.ResultsNine hundred sixty-six (966) people completed the questionnaire. Two hundred and seventy participants (28.7%) had a high school diploma or less, and 42 participants (4.4%) were facing financial hardship. The majority of respondents supported all end-of-life options and the loosening of eligibility requirements for medical assistance in dying. Differences between subgroups were minor. While respondents in socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroups had less knowledge about EOL practices, those with lower educational attainment were more likely to be in favor of medical assistance in dying, and less likely to favor continuous palliative sedation.ConclusionsPeople living with situational social and economic vulnerabilities face multiple barriers in accessing health care. While they may have poorer knowledge about EOL practices, they have a positive attitude towards medical assistance in dying and assisted suicide, and a negative attitude towards continuous palliative sedation. This highlights the need for future research and interventions aimed at empowering this population and enhancing their access to EOL care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济因素会影响对生命终结做法的认识、态度和表述吗?一项横断面研究。
目的:姑息治疗和临终关怀(EOL)的获得可能会受到这些实践的知识、态度和表现形式的影响。社会经济因素可能会影响人们对临终关怀实践的了解以及他们对这些实践的看法。本研究旨在比较不同社会经济变量对成人临终关怀实践(包括协助自杀、临终医疗协助和持续姑息镇静)的认知、态度和表述:方法:在加拿大魁北克省开展了一项基于社区的横断面问卷调查,调查内容包括两个不断演变的小故事和五种临终关怀实践。根据参与者的经济状况和受教育程度分别设立了三个样本分组。通过描述性分析,比较了各分组之间的知识、态度和表述水平:966(966)人完成了问卷调查。270名参与者(28.7%)只有高中或以下文凭,42名参与者(4.4%)面临经济困难。大多数受访者支持所有临终选择,并支持放宽临终医疗协助的资格要求。亚群体之间的差异较小。社会经济条件较差的亚群受访者对临终关怀实践的了解较少,而教育程度较低的受访者则更倾向于支持临终医疗协助,但不太赞成持续性姑息镇静:结论:生活在社会和经济弱势环境中的人在获得医疗服务方面面临多重障碍。虽然他们对临终关怀实践的了解可能较少,但他们对临终医疗协助和协助自杀持积极态度,而对持续性姑息镇静持消极态度。这凸显了未来研究和干预的必要性,其目的是增强这部分人群的能力,提高他们获得临终关怀的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Complexity in Care: Opportunities for Ethnographic Research in Palliative Care. Palliative Care Utilization Among Hospitalized Patients With Common Chronic Conditions in the United States. Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Biophototheranostic Story of Nile Blue Families: O, S, Se-Atom Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1