A critical review on the availability of substandard and falsified medicines online: Incidence, challenges and perspectives.

The journal of medicine access Pub Date : 2022-02-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23992026221074548
Jamee Ahmed, Laura Modica de Mohac, Tim K Mackey, Bahijja Tolulope Raimi-Abraham
{"title":"A critical review on the availability of substandard and falsified medicines online: Incidence, challenges and perspectives.","authors":"Jamee Ahmed,&nbsp;Laura Modica de Mohac,&nbsp;Tim K Mackey,&nbsp;Bahijja Tolulope Raimi-Abraham","doi":"10.1177/23992026221074548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simultaneous expansion of the Internet and increased globalisation of the pharmaceutical industry have meant medication can be accessed transnationally from both legal and illicit sources. This has coincided with the rise of substandard and falsified medicines (SFMs) online. These products fail to meet regulatory or quality standards and/or are constituted with substandard ingredients, causing undesired pharmacological effects, including possible injury and death. This review aimed to identify original research studies that examined characteristics of SFM online sales, attitudes towards purchasing medicines online and strategies to address this drug safety challenge. Keywords of 'Substandard' and 'Falsified'/'Counterfeit' and 'Medicines'/'Drugs' and 'Online'/'Internet' were searched using Web of Knowledge and PubMed databases. Resulting literature, which satisfied the study's inclusion criteria, was included in the review, and the findings from each paper were assessed. From an initial 185 literature articles, 7 were eligible according to the inclusion criteria to be reviewed. These articles identified studies testing SFMs purchased online, surveys of attitudes and knowledge about SFMs online, and website content analysis to detect illegal online sales. Challenges identified were lack of knowledge and awareness among consumers and physicians, in addition to the use of direct-to-consumer-advertising, via Internet platforms and social media, providing easy access to SFMs. Despite this, medicine authentication technology, website verification approaches and new detection methods were identified as potential solutions specific to online SFM sales. To address online sales of SFMs, more robust research, greater awareness/educational programmes, analytical detection methods and more stringent online global governance are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":75087,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medicine access","volume":" ","pages":"23992026221074548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413502/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medicine access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23992026221074548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Simultaneous expansion of the Internet and increased globalisation of the pharmaceutical industry have meant medication can be accessed transnationally from both legal and illicit sources. This has coincided with the rise of substandard and falsified medicines (SFMs) online. These products fail to meet regulatory or quality standards and/or are constituted with substandard ingredients, causing undesired pharmacological effects, including possible injury and death. This review aimed to identify original research studies that examined characteristics of SFM online sales, attitudes towards purchasing medicines online and strategies to address this drug safety challenge. Keywords of 'Substandard' and 'Falsified'/'Counterfeit' and 'Medicines'/'Drugs' and 'Online'/'Internet' were searched using Web of Knowledge and PubMed databases. Resulting literature, which satisfied the study's inclusion criteria, was included in the review, and the findings from each paper were assessed. From an initial 185 literature articles, 7 were eligible according to the inclusion criteria to be reviewed. These articles identified studies testing SFMs purchased online, surveys of attitudes and knowledge about SFMs online, and website content analysis to detect illegal online sales. Challenges identified were lack of knowledge and awareness among consumers and physicians, in addition to the use of direct-to-consumer-advertising, via Internet platforms and social media, providing easy access to SFMs. Despite this, medicine authentication technology, website verification approaches and new detection methods were identified as potential solutions specific to online SFM sales. To address online sales of SFMs, more robust research, greater awareness/educational programmes, analytical detection methods and more stringent online global governance are required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对网上伪劣药品可得性的批判性审查:发生率、挑战和前景。
互联网的同时扩大和制药业的日益全球化意味着可以从合法和非法来源获得跨国药物。与此同时,网上伪劣药品(SFMs)也在增多。这些产品不符合监管或质量标准和/或由不合格的成分组成,造成不希望的药理作用,包括可能的伤害和死亡。这篇综述的目的是找出原创性的研究,这些研究考察了SFM在线销售的特点、人们对在线购买药品的态度以及应对这一药物安全挑战的策略。使用Web of Knowledge和PubMed数据库检索“不合格”、“伪造”、“假冒”、“药品”、“在线”、“互联网”等关键词。满足研究纳入标准的文献被纳入综述,并对每篇论文的研究结果进行评估。从最初的185篇文献中,有7篇符合纳入标准。这些文章确定了测试在线购买的SFMs的研究,对在线SFMs的态度和知识的调查,以及网站内容分析以检测非法在线销售。确定的挑战包括消费者和医生缺乏知识和意识,以及通过互联网平台和社交媒体直接面向消费者进行广告宣传,从而容易获得SFMs。尽管如此,药物认证技术、网站验证方法和新的检测方法被确定为针对在线SFM销售的潜在解决方案。为了解决SFMs的在线销售问题,需要更有力的研究、更大的意识/教育计划、分析检测方法和更严格的在线全球治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stokes-Adams syndrome, a rarely reported disease. Multifocal brown tumors: A case report and literature review. Aligning our actions with our words: A systematic review of gender and racial diversity in surgical subspecialties. Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in emerging economies: Evidence from panel data analysis. Facilitators and barriers in acceptance of telemedicine among healthcare providers in Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1