Event Segmentation Enhances Older Adults' Reactive Cognitive Control Bias.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-15 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2022.2134548
Cassandra Skrotzki, Charles Stone, Kesaan Kandasamy, Lixia Yang
{"title":"Event Segmentation Enhances Older Adults' Reactive Cognitive Control Bias.","authors":"Cassandra Skrotzki, Charles Stone, Kesaan Kandasamy, Lixia Yang","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2134548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the effect of event segmentation on cognitive control mode use in a sample of older adults (<i>N</i> = 30; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 73, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 4.75) using a modified AX-Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT). This task included a perceptual event boundary between each cue and its forthcoming probe by means of a spatial shift across the left and right side of the display. Past research showed that young adults' existing proactive control bias could be enhanced in an event segmented AX-CPT relative to their performance on a standard AX-CPT. For older adults who adopt reactive control by default, the event boundary was expected to impede cue-reactivation during probe presentation, and thus further enhance their existing reactive control bias. To examine this, older adults were tested with a standard and an event segmented AX-CPT in two blocks, with error rates revealing a shift toward greater reactive control use in the event segmented relative to the standard AX-CPT. Findings supported our hypothesis that placing a spatial event boundary between each cue and forthcoming probe would further enhance older adults' reactive control bias. This study contributes to the sparse but growing literature on the effects of task-specific manipulations on cognitive control use. The results are discussed in light of the dual mechanisms of control framework and the event horizon model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2134548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of event segmentation on cognitive control mode use in a sample of older adults (N = 30; Mage = 73, SDage = 4.75) using a modified AX-Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT). This task included a perceptual event boundary between each cue and its forthcoming probe by means of a spatial shift across the left and right side of the display. Past research showed that young adults' existing proactive control bias could be enhanced in an event segmented AX-CPT relative to their performance on a standard AX-CPT. For older adults who adopt reactive control by default, the event boundary was expected to impede cue-reactivation during probe presentation, and thus further enhance their existing reactive control bias. To examine this, older adults were tested with a standard and an event segmented AX-CPT in two blocks, with error rates revealing a shift toward greater reactive control use in the event segmented relative to the standard AX-CPT. Findings supported our hypothesis that placing a spatial event boundary between each cue and forthcoming probe would further enhance older adults' reactive control bias. This study contributes to the sparse but growing literature on the effects of task-specific manipulations on cognitive control use. The results are discussed in light of the dual mechanisms of control framework and the event horizon model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事件分段增强了老年人的反应性认知控制偏差。
本研究使用改良的 AX-连续表现测试(AX-CPT),考察了事件分段对老年人认知控制模式使用的影响(样本数:30;年龄:73,平均年龄:4.75)。这项任务通过显示屏左右两侧的空间移动,在每个线索和即将出现的探针之间设置了一个感知事件边界。过去的研究表明,相对于标准 AX-CPT 的成绩,年轻成人在事件分段 AX-CPT 中现有的主动控制偏差会得到增强。对于默认采用反应控制的老年人来说,事件边界有望在探究呈现期间阻碍线索的反应激活,从而进一步增强他们现有的反应控制偏差。为了检验这一点,我们在两个区块中分别用标准和事件分段 AX-CPT 对老年人进行了测试,结果发现,相对于标准 AX-CPT 而言,事件分段 AX-CPT 的错误率更倾向于使用反应控制。研究结果支持了我们的假设,即在每个线索和即将进行的探究之间设置一个空间事件边界会进一步增强老年人的反应控制偏差。这项研究为有关特定任务操作对认知控制使用的影响的稀少但不断增长的文献做出了贡献。研究结果将根据控制的双重机制框架和事件视界模型进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive components of aging-related increase in word-finding difficulty. Accelerated long-term forgetting: from subjective memory decline to a defined clinical entity. Naturalistic assessments in virtual reality and in real life help resolve the age-prospective memory paradox. Effects of extended practice and unitization on relational memory in older adults and neuropsychological lesion cases. Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1