The COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing, and emotion recognition during late-childhood.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Social Development Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1111/sode.12631
Maia Chester, Rista C Plate, Tralucia Powell, Yuheiry Rodriguez, Nicholas J Wagner, Rebecca Waller
{"title":"The COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing, and emotion recognition during late-childhood.","authors":"Maia Chester, Rista C Plate, Tralucia Powell, Yuheiry Rodriguez, Nicholas J Wagner, Rebecca Waller","doi":"10.1111/sode.12631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face masks are an effective and important tool to prevent the spread of COVID-19, including among children. However, occluding parts of the face can impact emotion recognition, which is fundamental to effective social interactions. Social distancing, stress, and changes to routines because of the pandemic have also altered the social landscape of children, with implications for social development. To better understand how social input and context impact emotion recognition, the current study investigated emotion recognition in children (7-12 years old, <i>N</i> = 131) using images of both masked and unmasked emotional faces. We also assessed a subsample of participants (\"pre-pandemic subsample,\" <i>n</i> = 35) who had completed the same emotion recognition task with unmasked faces before and during the pandemic. Masking of faces was related to worse emotion recognition, with more pronounced effects for happy, sad, and fearful faces than angry and neutral faces. Masking was more strongly related to emotion recognition among children whose families reported greater social disruption in response to the pandemic. Finally, in the pre-pandemic subsample, emotion recognition of sad faces was lower during versus before the pandemic relative to other emotions. Together, findings show that occluding face parts and the broader social context (i.e., global pandemic) both impact emotion-relevant judgments in school-aged children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538546/pdf/SODE-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Face masks are an effective and important tool to prevent the spread of COVID-19, including among children. However, occluding parts of the face can impact emotion recognition, which is fundamental to effective social interactions. Social distancing, stress, and changes to routines because of the pandemic have also altered the social landscape of children, with implications for social development. To better understand how social input and context impact emotion recognition, the current study investigated emotion recognition in children (7-12 years old, N = 131) using images of both masked and unmasked emotional faces. We also assessed a subsample of participants ("pre-pandemic subsample," n = 35) who had completed the same emotion recognition task with unmasked faces before and during the pandemic. Masking of faces was related to worse emotion recognition, with more pronounced effects for happy, sad, and fearful faces than angry and neutral faces. Masking was more strongly related to emotion recognition among children whose families reported greater social disruption in response to the pandemic. Finally, in the pre-pandemic subsample, emotion recognition of sad faces was lower during versus before the pandemic relative to other emotions. Together, findings show that occluding face parts and the broader social context (i.e., global pandemic) both impact emotion-relevant judgments in school-aged children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行、戴面具和儿童晚期的情绪识别。
口罩是防止 COVID-19 传播(包括在儿童中传播)的有效而重要的工具。然而,遮挡脸部部分会影响情感识别,而情感识别是有效社会交往的基础。大流行病造成的社交疏远、压力和生活习惯的改变也改变了儿童的社交环境,对社会发展产生了影响。为了更好地了解社会输入和环境对情绪识别的影响,本研究使用蒙面和未蒙面的情绪面孔图像对儿童(7-12 岁,131 人)的情绪识别进行了调查。我们还评估了一个子样本("大流行前子样本",n = 35),这些子样本在大流行前和大流行期间完成了相同的未蒙面情绪识别任务。面孔蒙蔽与情绪识别能力下降有关,对快乐、悲伤和恐惧面孔的影响比对愤怒和中性面孔的影响更明显。对于那些因大流行而受到较大社会干扰的家庭,蒙面与儿童情绪识别的关系更为密切。最后,在大流行前的子样本中,相对于其他情绪,大流行期间和大流行前的儿童对悲伤面孔的情绪识别率较低。总之,研究结果表明,遮挡面孔部分和更广泛的社会背景(即全球大流行)都会影响学龄儿童的情绪相关判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness in Indonesian adolescents: Associations with quantity and quality of friendship and status within and between peer groups Developmental differences in young children's implied use of cognitive resources in their self‐regulation strategies Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people Paternal activation parenting and growth in children's inhibitory control across early childhood Revisiting the seminal studies of attachment formation and reevaluating what it means to become attached
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1