Target-Controlled Inhalational Anesthesia-Isoflurane Consumption with Adequacy of Anesthesia Monitoring in Conventional and Multimodal Analgesia - A Comparative Study.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-18 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_43_22
Reshma Vithayathil, Keelara Shivalingaiah Savitha, Nischala Dixit, Litty John
{"title":"Target-Controlled Inhalational Anesthesia-Isoflurane Consumption with Adequacy of Anesthesia Monitoring in Conventional and Multimodal Analgesia - A Comparative Study.","authors":"Reshma Vithayathil,&nbsp;Keelara Shivalingaiah Savitha,&nbsp;Nischala Dixit,&nbsp;Litty John","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_43_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a time of increased concern over the environmental impact of chlorofluorocarbons, there is an impetus to minimize inhalational anesthetic consumption. It is possible with multimodal analgesia (MMA) and the use of end-tidal controlled anesthesia (EtCA) which is a low-flow anesthesia technique with adequacy of anesthesia (AoA) monitoring. In MMA, all four elements of pain processing namely transduction, transmission, modulation, and perception are targeted with drugs having a different mechanism of action. In EtCA, anesthetic gases are automatically adjusted for the set minimal alveolar concentration by newer anesthesia work station (GE Healthcare Aisys CS2). AoA is a derived parameter of entropy and surgical pleth index which measures the depth of anesthesia and analgesia, respectively.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to assess the difference in isoflurane consumption between MMA and conventional groups for a given period of time with EtCA and AoA monitoring.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This was a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were divided into MMA group and conventional group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Both the groups received preemptive intravenous diclofenac sodium 75 g and 2% xyloadrenaline infiltration at entry ports. MMA group in addition received paracetamol 1 g and clonidine 0.75 μg.kg<sup>- 1</sup>. Intraoperatively, patients were on EtCA with AoA monitoring.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Mean differences in isoflurane consumption between the two groups were compared using an independent <i>t</i>-test. Postextubation adverse effects of analgesic drugs and awareness under general anesthesia were compared using the Chi-square test and presented as numbers and percentages. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean isoflurane consumption in the conventional group was 12.7 ± 5.3 mL which was significantly higher than the MMA group which was 8.9 ± 4.1 mL (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The duration of anesthesia between the groups was not significant clinically (<i>P</i> = 0.931).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EtCA with MMA significantly reduces isoflurane consumption compared to the conventional group of anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_43_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a time of increased concern over the environmental impact of chlorofluorocarbons, there is an impetus to minimize inhalational anesthetic consumption. It is possible with multimodal analgesia (MMA) and the use of end-tidal controlled anesthesia (EtCA) which is a low-flow anesthesia technique with adequacy of anesthesia (AoA) monitoring. In MMA, all four elements of pain processing namely transduction, transmission, modulation, and perception are targeted with drugs having a different mechanism of action. In EtCA, anesthetic gases are automatically adjusted for the set minimal alveolar concentration by newer anesthesia work station (GE Healthcare Aisys CS2). AoA is a derived parameter of entropy and surgical pleth index which measures the depth of anesthesia and analgesia, respectively.

Aim: The aim is to assess the difference in isoflurane consumption between MMA and conventional groups for a given period of time with EtCA and AoA monitoring.

Setting and design: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were divided into MMA group and conventional group.

Materials and methods: Both the groups received preemptive intravenous diclofenac sodium 75 g and 2% xyloadrenaline infiltration at entry ports. MMA group in addition received paracetamol 1 g and clonidine 0.75 μg.kg- 1. Intraoperatively, patients were on EtCA with AoA monitoring.

Statistical analysis: Mean differences in isoflurane consumption between the two groups were compared using an independent t-test. Postextubation adverse effects of analgesic drugs and awareness under general anesthesia were compared using the Chi-square test and presented as numbers and percentages. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant.

Results: Mean isoflurane consumption in the conventional group was 12.7 ± 5.3 mL which was significantly higher than the MMA group which was 8.9 ± 4.1 mL (P = 0.002). The duration of anesthesia between the groups was not significant clinically (P = 0.931).

Conclusion: EtCA with MMA significantly reduces isoflurane consumption compared to the conventional group of anesthesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标控制吸入麻醉-常规和多模式镇痛中异氟醚消耗与麻醉监测充分性的比较研究。
背景:在人们日益关注氟氯化碳对环境的影响之际,有一种将吸入麻醉剂的消耗降至最低的动力。多模态镇痛(MMA)和末潮控制麻醉(EtCA)是可能的,EtCA是一种低流量麻醉技术,有麻醉充足性(AoA)监测。在MMA中,疼痛处理的所有四个要素,即转导、传递、调节和感知,都是由具有不同作用机制的药物靶向的。在EtCA中,麻醉气体由较新的麻醉工作站(GE Healthcare Aisys CS2)自动调整为设定的最小肺泡浓度。AoA是熵和手术厚度指数的派生参数,分别衡量麻醉和镇痛的深度。目的:目的是通过EtCA和AoA监测,评估MMA组和常规组在给定时间段内异氟烷消耗量的差异。背景和设计:这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,涉及60例接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。分为综合格斗组和常规组。材料与方法:两组患者均给予双氯芬酸钠75 g静脉注射,入境口岸静脉滴注2%木肾上腺素。MMA组在此基础上给予扑热息痛1 g,可乐定0.75 g。kg - 1。术中,患者在AoA监测下进行EtCA。统计分析:使用独立t检验比较两组间异氟烷消耗的平均差异。拔管后镇痛药物不良反应和全麻下的意识不良反应采用卡方检验比较,并以数字和百分比表示。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:常规组异氟烷平均消耗量为12.7±5.3 mL,显著高于MMA组8.9±4.1 mL (P = 0.002)。两组麻醉时间临床差异无统计学意义(P = 0.931)。结论:与常规麻醉组相比,MMA联合EtCA可显著减少异氟醚的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1