Incremental Value of Left Atrial Function Analysis in the Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
{"title":"Incremental Value of Left Atrial Function Analysis in the Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Luca Longobardo, Concetta Zito, Gessica D'Amico, Annamaria Ioppolo, Anna Terrizzi, Alessandra Oteri, Maurizio Cusmà-Piccione","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_74_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left atrial (LA) reservoir strain provides interesting information about left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. However, the advantages of atrial reservoir strain in comparison with conventional parameters in patients with myocardial infarction are not clear yet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prospectively underwent echocardiographic assessment of LV systolic and diastolic function by conventional parameters and two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain of left atrium. LV filling pressure was estimated by brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic and conventional diastolic parameters did not show significant differences between patients with increased and normal BNP values, whereas LA reservoir strain was reduced (33.1 ± 8% vs. 46.5 ± 9.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.001) in patients with higher BNP levels. LA reservoir strain had higher area under curve value (0.880) than the other parameters in identifying patients with elevated BNP and a cut-off value of 40.5% reached sensitivity and specificity values of 93% and 86% and positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 85%. LA reservoir strain reclassified 23 patients with increased BNP values, which were previously estimated to have normal (16 patients) and undeterminable LA pressure (seven patients) by using the recommended algorithm for diastolic function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA reservoir strain is a useful tool for the evaluation of diastolic function and seems to be more sensitive than conventional parameters in the detection of subtle increase of LV filling pressure in patients with STEMI. It allows physicians to reclassify patients with undeterminable diastolic function according to conventional algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_74_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Left atrial (LA) reservoir strain provides interesting information about left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. However, the advantages of atrial reservoir strain in comparison with conventional parameters in patients with myocardial infarction are not clear yet.
Methods: Fifty patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prospectively underwent echocardiographic assessment of LV systolic and diastolic function by conventional parameters and two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain of left atrium. LV filling pressure was estimated by brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.
Results: Systolic and conventional diastolic parameters did not show significant differences between patients with increased and normal BNP values, whereas LA reservoir strain was reduced (33.1 ± 8% vs. 46.5 ± 9.8%; P = 0.001) in patients with higher BNP levels. LA reservoir strain had higher area under curve value (0.880) than the other parameters in identifying patients with elevated BNP and a cut-off value of 40.5% reached sensitivity and specificity values of 93% and 86% and positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 85%. LA reservoir strain reclassified 23 patients with increased BNP values, which were previously estimated to have normal (16 patients) and undeterminable LA pressure (seven patients) by using the recommended algorithm for diastolic function.
Conclusions: LA reservoir strain is a useful tool for the evaluation of diastolic function and seems to be more sensitive than conventional parameters in the detection of subtle increase of LV filling pressure in patients with STEMI. It allows physicians to reclassify patients with undeterminable diastolic function according to conventional algorithm.
背景:左心房(LA)储层应变提供了关于左心室(LV)充盈压力的有趣信息。然而,与常规参数相比,心房储层应变在心肌梗死患者中的优势尚不清楚。方法:50例st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者采用常规参数和二维散斑跟踪左心房纵应变对左室收缩和舒张功能进行前瞻性超声心动图评价。通过脑钠肽(BNP)水平估计左室充盈压。结果:BNP值升高和正常患者的收缩期和常规舒张期参数无显著差异,而LA库应变降低(33.1±8% vs 46.5±9.8%;P = 0.001)。LA水库菌株在识别BNP升高患者的曲线下面积(0.880)高于其他参数,临界值为40.5%,敏感性和特异性分别为93%和86%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为92%和85%。通过使用推荐的舒张功能算法,LA储层菌株对23例BNP值升高的患者进行了重新分类,这些患者先前估计为正常(16例)和不确定的LA压(7例)。结论:LA储层应变是评价STEMI患者左室舒张功能的有效工具,在检测左室充盈压的细微升高方面似乎比常规参数更敏感。它允许医生根据常规算法对无法确定舒张功能的患者进行重新分类。