On the Relationship between Speech Intelligibility and Fluency Indicators among English-Speaking Individuals with Parkinson's Diseases.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Behavioural Neurology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1224680
Chin-Ting Liu, Shiao-Wei Chu, Yuan-Shan Chen
{"title":"On the Relationship between Speech Intelligibility and Fluency Indicators among English-Speaking Individuals with Parkinson's Diseases.","authors":"Chin-Ting Liu,&nbsp;Shiao-Wei Chu,&nbsp;Yuan-Shan Chen","doi":"10.1155/2022/1224680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to investigate how much of variance in Parkinson's Disease (PD) individuals' speech intelligibility could be predicted by seven speech fluency indicators (i.e., <i>repetition</i>, <i>omission</i>, <i>distortion</i>, <i>correction</i>, <i>unfilled pauses</i>, <i>filled pauses,</i> and <i>speaking rate</i>). Speech data were retrieved from a database containing a reading task produced by a group of 16 English-speaking individuals with PD (Jaeger, Trivedi & Stadtchnitzer, 2019). The results from a multiple regression indicated that an addition of 54% of variance in the speech intelligibility scores among individuals with PD could be accounted for after the speakers' PD severity level measured based on Hoehn and Yahr's (1967) disease stage was included as a covariate. In addition, <i>omission</i> and <i>correction</i> were the two fluency indicators that contributed to the general intelligibility score in a statistically significant way. Specifically, for every one-unit gain in the number of <i>correction</i> and <i>omission</i>, speech intelligibility scores would decline by 0.687 and 0.131 point (out of a 7-point scale), respectively. The current study hence supported Magee, Copland, and Vogel's (2019) view that the language production abilities and quantified dysarthria measures among individuals with PD should be explored together. Additionally, the clinical implications based on the current findings were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50733,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550446/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1224680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate how much of variance in Parkinson's Disease (PD) individuals' speech intelligibility could be predicted by seven speech fluency indicators (i.e., repetition, omission, distortion, correction, unfilled pauses, filled pauses, and speaking rate). Speech data were retrieved from a database containing a reading task produced by a group of 16 English-speaking individuals with PD (Jaeger, Trivedi & Stadtchnitzer, 2019). The results from a multiple regression indicated that an addition of 54% of variance in the speech intelligibility scores among individuals with PD could be accounted for after the speakers' PD severity level measured based on Hoehn and Yahr's (1967) disease stage was included as a covariate. In addition, omission and correction were the two fluency indicators that contributed to the general intelligibility score in a statistically significant way. Specifically, for every one-unit gain in the number of correction and omission, speech intelligibility scores would decline by 0.687 and 0.131 point (out of a 7-point scale), respectively. The current study hence supported Magee, Copland, and Vogel's (2019) view that the language production abilities and quantified dysarthria measures among individuals with PD should be explored together. Additionally, the clinical implications based on the current findings were discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以英语为母语的帕金森病患者言语清晰度与流利度指标的关系
本研究旨在探讨通过重复、遗漏、失真、纠正、未填充停顿、填充停顿和说话率等7个言语流畅性指标,预测帕金森病(PD)个体言语可理解性的变异程度。语音数据从包含阅读任务的数据库中检索,该阅读任务由16名说英语的PD患者组成(Jaeger, Trivedi & Stadtchnitzer, 2019)。多元回归结果表明,将基于Hoehn and Yahr(1967)疾病分期测量的说话者PD严重程度作为协变量,PD个体的言语清晰度得分增加了54%的方差。此外,省略和更正是两个流畅性指标,对一般可理解性得分有显著的统计意义。具体来说,每增加一个单位的纠正和遗漏,语音可理解性分数将分别下降0.687和0.131分(满分为7分)。因此,目前的研究支持了Magee, Copland和Vogel(2019)的观点,即PD患者的语言产生能力和量化构音障碍测量应该一起探讨。此外,本文还讨论了基于当前研究结果的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Neurology
Behavioural Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Neurology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on various diseases and syndromes in behavioural neurology. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and clinicians working in various fields of neurology including cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychiatry. Topics of interest include: ADHD Aphasia Autism Alzheimer’s Disease Behavioural Disorders Dementia Epilepsy Multiple Sclerosis Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis Stroke Traumatic brain injury.
期刊最新文献
Quercetin Attenuates Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Brain Tissue of APP/PS1 Double Transgenic AD Mice by Regulating Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway to Improve Cognitive Impairment. Optogenetics Neuromodulation of the Nose. Multimodal Brain Tumor Classification Using Convolutional Tumnet Architecture Burnout and Life Satisfaction among Healthcare Workers Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Silesia, Poland) Identification of Potential Clusters of Signs and Symptoms to Prioritize Patients’ Eligibility for AADCd Screening by 3-OMD Testing: An Italian Delphi Consensus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1