Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction in Pulmonology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Amer Khan, Mir S Adil, K Nematullah, S Ihtisham, K Aamer, Syed Aamir
{"title":"Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction in Pulmonology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Amer Khan,&nbsp;Mir S Adil,&nbsp;K Nematullah,&nbsp;S Ihtisham,&nbsp;K Aamer,&nbsp;Syed Aamir","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.160744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is considered to be the sixth leading cause of death. The incidence rate estimates approximately 2% of hospital admissions are due to ADRs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To monitor ADRs in Pulmonology department of a tertiary care hospital patient with pulmonary diseases in an inpatient department of pulmonology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, single centered, observational and open labeled study was carried out in Princess Esra Hospital. The patient population was broadly divided into four categories based on diagnosis - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Infections, Asthma and Others. Suspected ADRs were reported, analyzed, and causality assessment was carried out using Naranjo's algorithm scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 302 patients were observed, of which 98 patients experienced ADRs, which accounted for 32.23% of the incidence and totally 160 ADEs were observed. Adult Patients were found to have higher incidence (32.09%) while the incidence rate was slightly greater in geriatric patients (32.39%). The highest incidence of ADEs were found in others group (78.57%). Majority of ADRs were suspected to be due to theophylline (19.39%). Gastrointestinal system (38.75%) was the most common organ system affected due to ADRs. Drug was withdrawn in 12 patients, and specific treatment was administered to 32 patients in view of clinical status. Specific treatment for the management of suspected reaction was administered in 32.65% of ADR reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A relatively high incidence of adverse drug events (32.2%) have been recorded which shows that not only Geriatric patients, but also adults are more susceptible to adverse drug effects. A number of drugs in combination were used, and ADEs often get multiplied. Careful therapeutic monitoring and dose individualization is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"6 3","pages":"84-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.160744","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.160744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is considered to be the sixth leading cause of death. The incidence rate estimates approximately 2% of hospital admissions are due to ADRs.

Objective: To monitor ADRs in Pulmonology department of a tertiary care hospital patient with pulmonary diseases in an inpatient department of pulmonology.

Materials and methods: A prospective, single centered, observational and open labeled study was carried out in Princess Esra Hospital. The patient population was broadly divided into four categories based on diagnosis - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Infections, Asthma and Others. Suspected ADRs were reported, analyzed, and causality assessment was carried out using Naranjo's algorithm scale.

Results: A total of 302 patients were observed, of which 98 patients experienced ADRs, which accounted for 32.23% of the incidence and totally 160 ADEs were observed. Adult Patients were found to have higher incidence (32.09%) while the incidence rate was slightly greater in geriatric patients (32.39%). The highest incidence of ADEs were found in others group (78.57%). Majority of ADRs were suspected to be due to theophylline (19.39%). Gastrointestinal system (38.75%) was the most common organ system affected due to ADRs. Drug was withdrawn in 12 patients, and specific treatment was administered to 32 patients in view of clinical status. Specific treatment for the management of suspected reaction was administered in 32.65% of ADR reports.

Conclusion: A relatively high incidence of adverse drug events (32.2%) have been recorded which shows that not only Geriatric patients, but also adults are more susceptible to adverse drug effects. A number of drugs in combination were used, and ADEs often get multiplied. Careful therapeutic monitoring and dose individualization is necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级医院肺病科药物不良反应的因果分析。
背景:药物不良反应(ADR)被认为是第六大死亡原因。发生率估计约2%的住院是由于不良反应。目的:监测某三级医院肺内科住院肺部疾病患者肺内科不良反应情况。材料与方法:在Esra公主医院进行一项前瞻性、单中心、观察性、开放标记的研究。病人根据诊断大致分为四类——慢性阻塞性肺病、感染、哮喘和其他。对疑似adr进行报告、分析,并采用Naranjo算法量表进行因果关系评估。结果:共观察302例患者,其中发生不良反应98例,占发生率的32.23%,共发生不良反应160例。成人患者发病率较高(32.09%),老年患者发病率略高(32.39%)。其他组ade发生率最高(78.57%)。绝大多数不良反应疑似由茶碱引起(19.39%)。胃肠道系统(38.75%)是adr最常见的脏器系统。12例患者停药,32例患者根据临床情况给予特异性治疗。32.65%的不良反应报告对可疑反应进行了特异性处理。结论:该院药物不良事件发生率较高(32.2%),不仅是老年患者,成人患者也更容易发生药物不良反应。许多药物联合使用,ADEs经常成倍增加。仔细的治疗监测和剂量个体化是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note on Flavonoids Evaluation of Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump for Oral Delivery of Ketorolac Prescribing Pattern and Potency of Anti-Diabetic Drugs in Diabetic Patients for Maintaining Optimal Glycemic Levels Community Pharmacy Practice Towards Cancer Health and the Need for Continuous Cancer Education: Ghana Situation Unusual Case of an Alcoholic with Liver Injury from Sulfasalazine Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1