Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up.

John N Trantalis, Stephen Sohmer, Kristie D More, Atiba A Nelson, Ben Wong, Corinne H Dyke, Gail M Thornton, Richard S Boorman, Ian K Y Lo
{"title":"Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up.","authors":"John N Trantalis,&nbsp;Stephen Sohmer,&nbsp;Kristie D More,&nbsp;Atiba A Nelson,&nbsp;Ben Wong,&nbsp;Corinne H Dyke,&nbsp;Gail M Thornton,&nbsp;Richard S Boorman,&nbsp;Ian K Y Lo","doi":"10.4103/0973-6042.161434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the clinical and anatomic outcome of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The senior author performed isolated repairs of 25 type II SLAP lesions in 25 patients with a mean age of 40.0 ± 12 years. All tears were repaired using standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair to bone. All patients were reviewed using a standardized clinical examination by a blinded, independent observer, and using several shoulder outcome measures. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Two-tailed paired t-test were used to determine significant differences in preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes scores. In addition, a Fisher's exact test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 54-month, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES) scores improved from 52.1 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores from 7.7 to 10.6 (P < 0.0002). Twenty-two out of the 25 patients (88%) stated that they would have surgery again. Of the 21 patients who had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging arthrographys (MRAs), 9 patients (43%) demonstrated dye tracking between the labrum bone interface suggestive of a recurrent tear and 12 patients (57%) had a completely intact repair. There was no significant difference in ASES, SST, and patient satisfaction scores in patients with recurrent or intact repairs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes. However, MRA imaging demonstrated 43% of patients with recurrent tears. MRA results do not necessarily correlate with clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":51295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"74-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/e0/IJSS-9-74.PMC4528287.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Shoulder Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.161434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the clinical and anatomic outcome of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions.

Materials and methods: The senior author performed isolated repairs of 25 type II SLAP lesions in 25 patients with a mean age of 40.0 ± 12 years. All tears were repaired using standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair to bone. All patients were reviewed using a standardized clinical examination by a blinded, independent observer, and using several shoulder outcome measures. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively.

Statistical analysis used: Two-tailed paired t-test were used to determine significant differences in preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes scores. In addition, a Fisher's exact test was used.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 54-month, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES) scores improved from 52.1 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores from 7.7 to 10.6 (P < 0.0002). Twenty-two out of the 25 patients (88%) stated that they would have surgery again. Of the 21 patients who had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging arthrographys (MRAs), 9 patients (43%) demonstrated dye tracking between the labrum bone interface suggestive of a recurrent tear and 12 patients (57%) had a completely intact repair. There was no significant difference in ASES, SST, and patient satisfaction scores in patients with recurrent or intact repairs.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes. However, MRA imaging demonstrated 43% of patients with recurrent tears. MRA results do not necessarily correlate with clinical outcome.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜下II型SLAP损伤的修复:临床和解剖随访。
目的:目的是评估关节镜下修复II型SLAP病变的临床和解剖结果。材料和方法:资深作者对25例平均年龄40.0±12岁的患者进行了25例II型SLAP病变的孤立修复。所有撕裂均采用标准关节镜缝合锚钉骨修复。所有患者均由盲法独立观察者进行标准化临床检查,并采用几种肩部预后指标。患者在术后至少1年通过磁共振成像关节造影进行评估。采用统计学分析:采用双尾配对t检验确定术前和术后临床结局评分的显著差异。此外,还使用了费雪精确检验。结果:平均随访54个月,美国肩关节外科医生肩关节指数(asas)评分从术前的52.1分提高到术后的86.1分(P < 0.0001),简单肩关节测试(SST)评分从7.7分提高到10.6分(P < 0.0002)。25名患者中有22名(88%)表示他们会再次接受手术。在21例术后进行磁共振关节成像(MRAs)的患者中,9例(43%)患者在唇骨界面之间显示染色痕迹,提示复发性撕裂,12例(57%)患者完全完整修复。复发修复或完整修复患者的asa、SST和患者满意度评分无显著差异。结论:关节镜下修复II型SLAP病变可改善临床结果。然而,MRA成像显示43%的患者复发性撕裂。MRA结果不一定与临床结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.21
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
60 Convertible Humeral Stem: Anatomic to Reverse Arthroplasty 67 Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation of Glenoid Rim Fractures 16 Arthroscopic Biceps Transfer 45 Posterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Replacement: Eccentric Reaming 30 Partial Humeral Head Replacement: Allograft and Prosthetic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1