Effects of in vitro hemodilution with crystalloids, colloids, and plasma on canine whole blood coagulation as determined by kaolin-activated thromboelastography.

Bari R Morris, Armelle deLaforcade, Joyce Lee, Joseph Palmisano, Dawn Meola, Elizabeth Rozanski
{"title":"Effects of in vitro hemodilution with crystalloids, colloids, and plasma on canine whole blood coagulation as determined by kaolin-activated thromboelastography.","authors":"Bari R Morris,&nbsp;Armelle deLaforcade,&nbsp;Joyce Lee,&nbsp;Joseph Palmisano,&nbsp;Dawn Meola,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rozanski","doi":"10.1111/vec.12345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of in vitro hemodilution with lactated Ringers solution (LRS), hetastarch (HES), and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on whole blood coagulation in dogs as assessed by kaolin-activated thromboelastography.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In vitro experimental study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Six healthy client-owned dogs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Whole blood was collected and diluted in vitro at a 33% and 67% dilution with either LRS, HES, or FFP.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Kaolin-activated thromboelastography was performed on each sample as well as a control. Thromboelastographic parameters R (min), alpha (deg), K (min), and MA (mm) were measured and compared to the sample control for each dilution using mixed model methodology. Prolongation in coagulation times were seen at both dilutions with LRS and HES. There was no significant difference in R times at the 33% dilution, but R time was significantly prolonged at the 67% dilution with HES (P = 0.004). MA was significantly decreased for LRS at both dilutions (P = 0.013, P < 0.001) and more profoundly decreased for HES (P < 0.001, P = 0.006). No significant difference in any parameter was found for FFP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In vitro hemodilution of whole blood with both LRS and HES but not FFP resulted in significant effects on coagulation with HES having a more profound effect. In vivo evaluation of changes in coagulation with various resuscitation fluids is warranted and may be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12345","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of in vitro hemodilution with lactated Ringers solution (LRS), hetastarch (HES), and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on whole blood coagulation in dogs as assessed by kaolin-activated thromboelastography.

Design: In vitro experimental study.

Setting: University teaching hospital.

Animals: Six healthy client-owned dogs.

Interventions: Whole blood was collected and diluted in vitro at a 33% and 67% dilution with either LRS, HES, or FFP.

Measurements and main results: Kaolin-activated thromboelastography was performed on each sample as well as a control. Thromboelastographic parameters R (min), alpha (deg), K (min), and MA (mm) were measured and compared to the sample control for each dilution using mixed model methodology. Prolongation in coagulation times were seen at both dilutions with LRS and HES. There was no significant difference in R times at the 33% dilution, but R time was significantly prolonged at the 67% dilution with HES (P = 0.004). MA was significantly decreased for LRS at both dilutions (P = 0.013, P < 0.001) and more profoundly decreased for HES (P < 0.001, P = 0.006). No significant difference in any parameter was found for FFP.

Conclusions: In vitro hemodilution of whole blood with both LRS and HES but not FFP resulted in significant effects on coagulation with HES having a more profound effect. In vivo evaluation of changes in coagulation with various resuscitation fluids is warranted and may be clinically relevant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晶体、胶体和血浆体外血液稀释对犬全血凝固的影响(高岭土活化血栓弹性成像)。
目的:探讨乳酸林格液(LRS)、hetastarch (HES)和新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)体外血液稀释对狗全血凝固的影响,并采用高岭土活化血小板弹性成像技术进行评价。设计:体外实验研究。单位:大学教学医院。动物:6只健康的宠物狗。干预措施:收集全血并用LRS、HES或FFP在体外稀释33%和67%。测量和主要结果:高岭土活化的血栓弹性成像对每个样品以及对照进行。使用混合模型方法测量了每次稀释后的血栓弹性参数R (min)、alpha (deg)、K (min)和MA (mm),并与样品对照进行了比较。LRS和HES稀释后凝血时间均延长。33%稀释度下R时间差异无统计学意义,67%稀释度下R时间显著延长(P = 0.004)。两种稀释浓度下LRS的MA均显著降低(P = 0.013, P < 0.001),而HES的MA降低更为显著(P < 0.001, P = 0.006)。FFP各参数均无显著差异。结论:全血经LRS和HES而非FFP稀释后,体外血液稀释对凝血有显著影响,其中HES的作用更为深远。体内评价不同复苏液体的凝血变化是必要的,并且可能具有临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine. Development and implementation of a hemovigilance program at a university veterinary teaching hospital. 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2021. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1