A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I-II safety study [NCT00646412].

Annals of surgical innovation and research Pub Date : 2015-09-02 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1
Reinhold Lang, Petra Baumann, Claudia Schmoor, Erich K Odermatt, Moritz N Wente, Karl-Walter Jauch
{"title":"A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I-II safety study [NCT00646412].","authors":"Reinhold Lang,&nbsp;Petra Baumann,&nbsp;Claudia Schmoor,&nbsp;Erich K Odermatt,&nbsp;Moritz N Wente,&nbsp;Karl-Walter Jauch","doi":"10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-abdominal surgical intervention can cause the development of intra-peritoneal adhesions. To reduce this problem, different agents have been tested to minimize abdominal adhesions; however, the optimal adhesion prophylaxis has not been found so far. Therefore, the A-Part(®) Gel was developed as a barrier to diminish postsurgical adhesions; the aim of this randomized controlled study was a first evaluation of its safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, controlled, randomized, patient-blinded, monocenter phase I-II study, 62 patients received either the hydrogel A-Part-Gel(®) as an anti-adhesive barrier or were untreated after primary elective median laparotomy. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of peritonitis and/or wound healing impairment 28 ± 10 days postoperatively. As secondary endpoints anastomotic leakage until 28 days after surgery, adverse events and adhesions were assessed until 3 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lower rate of wound healing impairment and/or peritonitis was observed in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control group: (6.5 vs. 13.8 %). The difference between the two groups was -7.3%, 90 % confidence interval [-20.1, 5.4 %]. Both treatment groups showed similar frequency of anastomotic leakage but incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were slightly lower in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control. Adhesion rates were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A-Part Gel(®) is safe as an adhesion prophylaxis after abdominal wall surgery but no reduction of postoperative peritoneal adhesion could be found in comparison to the control group. This may at least in part be due to the small sample size as well as to the incomplete coverage of the incision due to the used application.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT00646412.</p>","PeriodicalId":87428,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","volume":"9 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal surgical intervention can cause the development of intra-peritoneal adhesions. To reduce this problem, different agents have been tested to minimize abdominal adhesions; however, the optimal adhesion prophylaxis has not been found so far. Therefore, the A-Part(®) Gel was developed as a barrier to diminish postsurgical adhesions; the aim of this randomized controlled study was a first evaluation of its safety and efficacy.

Methods: In this prospective, controlled, randomized, patient-blinded, monocenter phase I-II study, 62 patients received either the hydrogel A-Part-Gel(®) as an anti-adhesive barrier or were untreated after primary elective median laparotomy. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of peritonitis and/or wound healing impairment 28 ± 10 days postoperatively. As secondary endpoints anastomotic leakage until 28 days after surgery, adverse events and adhesions were assessed until 3 months postoperatively.

Results: A lower rate of wound healing impairment and/or peritonitis was observed in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control group: (6.5 vs. 13.8 %). The difference between the two groups was -7.3%, 90 % confidence interval [-20.1, 5.4 %]. Both treatment groups showed similar frequency of anastomotic leakage but incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were slightly lower in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control. Adhesion rates were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: A-Part Gel(®) is safe as an adhesion prophylaxis after abdominal wall surgery but no reduction of postoperative peritoneal adhesion could be found in comparison to the control group. This may at least in part be due to the small sample size as well as to the incomplete coverage of the incision due to the used application.

Trial registration: NCT00646412.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
a - part凝胶,腹部手术粘连预防:一项随机对照I-II期安全性研究[NCT00646412]。
背景:腹内手术干预可引起腹膜内粘连的发展。为了减少这个问题,已经测试了不同的药物来减少腹部粘连;然而,到目前为止,还没有找到最佳的粘连预防方法。因此,a - part(®)凝胶被开发为减少术后粘连的屏障;这项随机对照研究的目的是对其安全性和有效性进行首次评估。方法:在这项前瞻性、对照、随机、患者盲、单中心I-II期研究中,62例患者在初次择期剖腹手术后接受了水凝胶A-Part-Gel(®)作为抗粘连屏障或未经治疗。主要终点为术后28±10天腹膜炎和/或伤口愈合损伤的发生。次要终点为术后28天的吻合口漏,不良事件和粘连评估至术后3个月。结果:与对照组相比,A-部分凝胶(®)组伤口愈合损伤和/或腹膜炎的发生率较低:(6.5%比13.8%)。两组间差异为-7.3%,90%置信区间[-20.1,5.4%]。两组吻合口漏发生率相似,但a -部分凝胶(®)组的不良事件和严重不良事件发生率略低于对照组。两组的粘连率具有可比性。结论:A-Part凝胶(®)作为腹壁手术后的粘连预防药物是安全的,但与对照组相比,术后腹膜粘连没有减少。这可能至少部分是由于小样本量以及由于使用的应用程序导致的切口的不完全覆盖。试验注册:NCT00646412。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel treatments for complications after bariatric surgery Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study Current Outcomes of Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch Benefits of intraoperative endoscopy: case report and review of 300 sleeves gastrectomies Development of automated postoperative enteral nutrition: restricting feeding site inflow to match peristaltic outflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1