Optimization of Dual-Labeled Antibodies for Targeted Intraoperative Imaging of Tumors.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Mark Rijpkema, Desirée L Bos, Alex S Cornelissen, Gerben M Franssen, David M Goldenberg, Wim J Oyen, Otto C Boerman
{"title":"Optimization of Dual-Labeled Antibodies for Targeted Intraoperative Imaging of Tumors.","authors":"Mark Rijpkema,&nbsp;Desirée L Bos,&nbsp;Alex S Cornelissen,&nbsp;Gerben M Franssen,&nbsp;David M Goldenberg,&nbsp;Wim J Oyen,&nbsp;Otto C Boerman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For intraoperative imaging, antibodies labeled with both a radionuclide and a fluorophore may be used to tag the tumor lesion with a radiolabel and a fluorescent signal at high tumor to background ratios. However, labeling antibodies with fluorescent moieties may affect the in vivo behavior of the antibody depending on the dye to antibody substitution ratio. To investigate the optimal substitution ratio for use in dual-modality image-guided surgery, we conjugated three different antibodies, MN-14 (anti-CEACAM5), girentuximab (anti-CAIX), and cetuximab (anti-EGFR), with both diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA, for labeling with 111In) and IRdye 800CW at dye to antibody ratios of 0, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 and assessed in vivo behavior. Biodistribution studies showed that at high dye to antibody ratios, liver uptake of the dual-labeled antibodies increased, whereas tumor uptake decreased. Conversely, very low ratios may not be optimal either because in that case, only a few antibody molecules will be dual-labeled (i.e., contain both a DTPA and an IRDye 800CW moiety), which may complicate interpretation of dual-modality data. The present study shows that, provided that the chelator to antibody ratio is high enough, a dye to antibody ratio in the range of 1 to 1.5 is optimal for antibody-targeted dual-modality imaging applications. However, the optimal configuration is antibody dependent and should be determined for each dual-labeled antibody individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":18855,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":"348-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For intraoperative imaging, antibodies labeled with both a radionuclide and a fluorophore may be used to tag the tumor lesion with a radiolabel and a fluorescent signal at high tumor to background ratios. However, labeling antibodies with fluorescent moieties may affect the in vivo behavior of the antibody depending on the dye to antibody substitution ratio. To investigate the optimal substitution ratio for use in dual-modality image-guided surgery, we conjugated three different antibodies, MN-14 (anti-CEACAM5), girentuximab (anti-CAIX), and cetuximab (anti-EGFR), with both diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA, for labeling with 111In) and IRdye 800CW at dye to antibody ratios of 0, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 and assessed in vivo behavior. Biodistribution studies showed that at high dye to antibody ratios, liver uptake of the dual-labeled antibodies increased, whereas tumor uptake decreased. Conversely, very low ratios may not be optimal either because in that case, only a few antibody molecules will be dual-labeled (i.e., contain both a DTPA and an IRDye 800CW moiety), which may complicate interpretation of dual-modality data. The present study shows that, provided that the chelator to antibody ratio is high enough, a dye to antibody ratio in the range of 1 to 1.5 is optimal for antibody-targeted dual-modality imaging applications. However, the optimal configuration is antibody dependent and should be determined for each dual-labeled antibody individually.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双标记抗体在肿瘤术中靶向成像中的优化。
对于术中成像,用放射性核素和荧光基团标记的抗体可用于在高肿瘤与背景比下用放射性标记和荧光信号标记肿瘤病变。然而,用荧光部分标记抗体可能会影响抗体的体内行为,这取决于染料与抗体的取代比。为了研究双模影像引导手术的最佳替代比例,我们将三种不同的抗体MN-14(抗ceacam5)、吉伦妥昔单抗(抗caix)和西妥昔单抗(抗egfr)与二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA,用于标记111In)和IRdye 800CW结合,染料与抗体的比例分别为0,1,1.5,2和3,并评估其在体内的行为。生物分布研究表明,在高染料抗体比下,双标记抗体的肝脏摄取增加,而肿瘤摄取减少。相反,非常低的比例也可能不是最佳的,因为在这种情况下,只有少数抗体分子会被双重标记(即,同时包含DTPA和IRDye 800CW片段),这可能会使双模态数据的解释复杂化。本研究表明,只要螯合剂与抗体的比例足够高,染料与抗体的比例在1到1.5之间是抗体靶向双模成像应用的最佳选择。然而,最佳配置是抗体依赖的,应该为每个双标记抗体单独确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging
Molecular Imaging Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
自引率
3.60%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging is a peer-reviewed, open access journal highlighting the breadth of molecular imaging research from basic science to preclinical studies to human applications. This serves both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating novel results and concepts relevant to the biological study of normal and disease processes in both basic and translational studies ranging from mice to humans.
期刊最新文献
In Situ Mapping of the Glucose Metabolism Heterogeneity in Atherosclerosis: Correlation With 2-Deoxyglucose Uptake. Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging. Study on the Relationship Between MRI Functional Imaging and Multiple Immunohistochemical Features of Glioma: A Noninvasive and More Precise Glioma Management. PET/CT in the Evaluation of CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in Hematological Malignancies. Combining Nuclear Medicine With Other Modalities: Future Prospect for Multimodality Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1