Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Volumes: An Illustrative Depiction.

Aditya Tadinada, Elnaz Jalali, Aniket Jadhav, Gian Pietro Schincaglia, Sumit Yadav
{"title":"Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Volumes: An Illustrative Depiction.","authors":"Aditya Tadinada,&nbsp;Elnaz Jalali,&nbsp;Aniket Jadhav,&nbsp;Gian Pietro Schincaglia,&nbsp;Sumit Yadav","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The evolution of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has brought about a paradigm shift in radiographic evaluation of the maxillofacial skeleton. Because of its low cost, high resolution, and relatively low-radiation dose, CBCT is fast becoming the 3-D imaging modality of choice in dentistry. The ubiquitous availability of this new imaging modality poses unique challenges in understanding this technology and recognizing the associated artifacts that present themselves in the acquired image volumes. There are several artifacts that are inherent to CBCT scans by virtue of the physics behind their acquisition and image reconstruction algorithms.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>An image artifact may be defined as a visualized structure in the reconstructed data that was not originally present in the object or the imaged area of interest. It can be explained as any distortion or error in the image that is unrelated to the subject being studied. Artifacts are induced by discrepancies between the physical conditions of the measuring setup, which is usually the CBCT scanner's technical composition and position of the object under investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to present an illustrative depiction of the most commonly encountered CBCT artifacts with an explanation of how each artifact is caused and how it presents itself in CBCT image volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because these artifacts cause significant image degradation and often misrepresent the region of interest, they should be recognized, understood, and taught along with normal CBCT anatomy to facilitate accurate evaluation of the image volumes and prevent inaccurate diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":76048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society","volume":"64 1","pages":"12-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The evolution of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has brought about a paradigm shift in radiographic evaluation of the maxillofacial skeleton. Because of its low cost, high resolution, and relatively low-radiation dose, CBCT is fast becoming the 3-D imaging modality of choice in dentistry. The ubiquitous availability of this new imaging modality poses unique challenges in understanding this technology and recognizing the associated artifacts that present themselves in the acquired image volumes. There are several artifacts that are inherent to CBCT scans by virtue of the physics behind their acquisition and image reconstruction algorithms.

Background: An image artifact may be defined as a visualized structure in the reconstructed data that was not originally present in the object or the imaged area of interest. It can be explained as any distortion or error in the image that is unrelated to the subject being studied. Artifacts are induced by discrepancies between the physical conditions of the measuring setup, which is usually the CBCT scanner's technical composition and position of the object under investigation.

Objective: The objective of this study is to present an illustrative depiction of the most commonly encountered CBCT artifacts with an explanation of how each artifact is caused and how it presents itself in CBCT image volumes.

Conclusion: Because these artifacts cause significant image degradation and often misrepresent the region of interest, they should be recognized, understood, and taught along with normal CBCT anatomy to facilitate accurate evaluation of the image volumes and prevent inaccurate diagnoses.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束计算机断层成像图像卷中的伪影:说明性描述。
锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的发展带来了颌面骨骼放射学评估的范式转变。由于其低成本、高分辨率和相对低的辐射剂量,CBCT正迅速成为牙科三维成像的首选方式。这种新成像方式的无处不在的可用性给理解这项技术和识别在获得的图像体积中呈现的相关工件带来了独特的挑战。由于其获取和图像重建算法背后的物理原理,CBCT扫描中存在一些固有的伪影。背景:图像伪影可以定义为重建数据中的可视化结构,该结构最初不存在于对象或感兴趣的成像区域中。它可以被解释为与被研究的主题无关的图像中的任何扭曲或错误。伪影是由测量装置的物理条件之间的差异引起的,这通常是CBCT扫描仪的技术组成和被调查对象的位置。目的:本研究的目的是对最常见的CBCT伪影进行说明性描述,并解释每个伪影是如何产生的,以及它如何在CBCT图像中表现出来。结论:由于这些伪影会导致严重的图像退化,并且经常歪曲感兴趣的区域,因此应该与正常的CBCT解剖一起识别、理解和教授它们,以促进对图像体积的准确评估,防止不准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Looking good. Something for everyone. Calls to action. Cemento-osseous dysplasia. Opportunities for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1