Cardiovascular medication: improving adherence using prompting mechanisms.

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-09-21
Liam Glynn, Tom Fahey
{"title":"Cardiovascular medication: improving adherence using prompting mechanisms.","authors":"Liam Glynn,&nbsp;Tom Fahey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to medication is generally defined as the extent to which people take medications as prescribed by their healthcare providers. It can be assessed in many ways (e.g., by self-reporting, pill counting, direct observation, electronic monitoring, or by pharmacy records). This overview reports effects of prompting mechanisms on adherence to cardiovascular medications, however adherence has been measured.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of prompting mechanisms to improve adherence to long-term medication for cardiovascular disease in adults? We searched Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 174 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 80 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 45 studies and the further review of 35 full publications. Of the 35 full articles evaluated, one RCT was added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation of seven PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for seven comparisons based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of prompting mechanisms, alone and in combination with reminder packaging or patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577014/pdf/2015-0220.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adherence to medication is generally defined as the extent to which people take medications as prescribed by their healthcare providers. It can be assessed in many ways (e.g., by self-reporting, pill counting, direct observation, electronic monitoring, or by pharmacy records). This overview reports effects of prompting mechanisms on adherence to cardiovascular medications, however adherence has been measured.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of prompting mechanisms to improve adherence to long-term medication for cardiovascular disease in adults? We searched Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 174 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 80 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 45 studies and the further review of 35 full publications. Of the 35 full articles evaluated, one RCT was added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation of seven PICO combinations.

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for seven comparisons based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of prompting mechanisms, alone and in combination with reminder packaging or patient education.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管药物:利用提示机制提高依从性。
导读:药物依从性通常被定义为人们按照医疗保健提供者的处方服用药物的程度。它可以通过多种方式进行评估(例如,通过自我报告、药片计数、直接观察、电子监测或药房记录)。本综述报告了提示机制对心血管药物依从性的影响,但依从性已被测量。方法和结果:我们进行了系统的综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:提示机制对提高成人心血管疾病长期药物依从性的影响是什么?截至2014年5月,我们检索了Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据综述定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取最新版本的评论)。结果:在本次更新中,检索电子数据库检索到174项研究。在删除和删除会议摘要后,筛选了80条记录纳入概述。对标题和摘要的评估导致45项研究被排除,35篇完整出版物被进一步审查。在评估的35篇完整文章中,在本次更新中增加了一项RCT。我们对7种PICO组合进行了GRADE评价。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们根据提示机制的有效性和安全性相关信息,对7项比较的疗效进行了分类,提示机制可以单独使用,也可以与提醒包装或患者教育相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute kidney injury. Bacterial conjunctivitis. Shoulder pain. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pelvic inflammatory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1