Sex Differences and the Impact of Chronic Stress and Recovery on Instrumental Learning.

Neuroscience journal Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-04-16 DOI:10.1155/2015/697659
Angela L McDowell, Kathryn M H Fransen, Kevin S Elliott, Alhasan Elghouche, Polina V Kostylev, Pamela K O'Dea, Preston E Garraghty
{"title":"Sex Differences and the Impact of Chronic Stress and Recovery on Instrumental Learning.","authors":"Angela L McDowell,&nbsp;Kathryn M H Fransen,&nbsp;Kevin S Elliott,&nbsp;Alhasan Elghouche,&nbsp;Polina V Kostylev,&nbsp;Pamela K O'Dea,&nbsp;Preston E Garraghty","doi":"10.1155/2015/697659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have previously shown that 21-day chronic restraint stress impacts instrumental learning, but overall few studies have examined sex differences on the impact of stress on learning. We further examined sex differences in response to extended 42-day chronic stress on instrumental learning, as well as recovery from chronic stress. Rats were tested in aversive training tasks with or without prior appetitive experience, and daily body weight data was collected as an index of stress. Relative to control animals, reduced body weight was maintained from day 22 through day 42 across the stress period for males, but not for females. Stressed males had increased response speed and lower learning efficiency during appetitive acquisition and aversive learning. Males overall showed slower escape shaping times and more shock exposure. In contrast, stressed females showed slower appetitive response speeds and higher appetitive and aversive efficiency but overall reduced avoidance rates during acquisition and maintenance for transfer animals and during maintenance for aversive-only animals. These tasks reveal important nuances on the effect of stress on goal-directed behavior and further highlight sexually divergent effects on appetitive versus aversive motivation. Furthermore, these data underscore that systems are temporally impacted by chronic stress in a sexually divergent pattern. </p>","PeriodicalId":91144,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience journal","volume":"2015 ","pages":"697659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/697659","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/697659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We have previously shown that 21-day chronic restraint stress impacts instrumental learning, but overall few studies have examined sex differences on the impact of stress on learning. We further examined sex differences in response to extended 42-day chronic stress on instrumental learning, as well as recovery from chronic stress. Rats were tested in aversive training tasks with or without prior appetitive experience, and daily body weight data was collected as an index of stress. Relative to control animals, reduced body weight was maintained from day 22 through day 42 across the stress period for males, but not for females. Stressed males had increased response speed and lower learning efficiency during appetitive acquisition and aversive learning. Males overall showed slower escape shaping times and more shock exposure. In contrast, stressed females showed slower appetitive response speeds and higher appetitive and aversive efficiency but overall reduced avoidance rates during acquisition and maintenance for transfer animals and during maintenance for aversive-only animals. These tasks reveal important nuances on the effect of stress on goal-directed behavior and further highlight sexually divergent effects on appetitive versus aversive motivation. Furthermore, these data underscore that systems are temporally impacted by chronic stress in a sexually divergent pattern.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别差异及慢性压力与恢复对器乐学习的影响。
我们之前的研究表明,21天的慢性约束压力会影响工具学习,但总体而言,很少有研究考察压力对学习影响的性别差异。我们进一步研究了性别差异对乐器学习42天慢性应激的反应,以及从慢性应激中恢复的情况。大鼠在有或没有先前的食欲经验的厌恶训练任务中进行测试,并收集每日体重数据作为压力指数。与对照组相比,雄鼠在应激期的第22 ~ 42天保持体重减轻,雌鼠则相反。应激男性在食欲习得和厌恶学习中反应速度加快,学习效率降低。男性总体上表现出较慢的逃逸成形时间和更多的电击暴露。相比之下,应激雌性在获取和维持转移动物和维持厌恶动物期间表现出较慢的食欲反应速度和较高的食欲和厌恶效率,但总体上降低了回避率。这些任务揭示了压力对目标导向行为影响的重要细微差别,并进一步强调了性差异对食欲动机和厌恶动机的影响。此外,这些数据强调,系统是暂时的影响慢性压力在性别差异模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stress-Coping Humoral Glycolipids Produced by Mice Given Controlled Bathing Treatments Predictors of Seizure Recurrence after Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Impact of Tooth Loss and Other Risk Factors on Cognitive Impairment in Saudi Female Population Pathomechanisms of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in ALS. Sequential Changes in Brain Glutamate and Adenosine A1 Receptors May Explain Severity of Adolescent Alcohol Withdrawal after Consumption of High Levels of Alcohol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1