The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde.

Annals of Occupational Hygiene Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-09-04 DOI:10.1093/annhyg/mev058
Timothy R Driscoll, Renee N Carey, Susan Peters, Deborah C Glass, Geza Benke, Alison Reid, Lin Fritschi
{"title":"The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde.","authors":"Timothy R Driscoll,&nbsp;Renee N Carey,&nbsp;Susan Peters,&nbsp;Deborah C Glass,&nbsp;Geza Benke,&nbsp;Alison Reid,&nbsp;Lin Fritschi","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mev058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to formaldehyde, to identify the main circumstances of exposure and to describe the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis used data from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey, which investigated the current prevalence and exposure circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including formaldehyde, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4993 included respondents, 124 (2.5%) were identified as probably being exposed to formaldehyde in the course of their work [extrapolated to 2.6% of the Australian working population-265 000 (95% confidence interval 221 000-316 000) workers]. Most (87.1%) were male. About half worked in technical and trades occupations. In terms of industry, about half worked in the construction industry. The main circumstances of exposure were working with particle board or plywood typically through carpentry work, building maintenance, or sanding prior to painting; with the more common of other exposures circumstances being firefighters involved in fighting fires, fire overhaul, and clean-up or back-burning; and health workers using formaldehyde when sterilizing equipment or in a pathology laboratory setting. The use of control measures was inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Workers are exposed to formaldehyde in many different occupational circumstances. Information on the exposure circumstances can be used to support decisions on appropriate priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to formaldehyde, and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to formaldehyde.</p>","PeriodicalId":8458,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/annhyg/mev058","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Introduction: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to formaldehyde, to identify the main circumstances of exposure and to describe the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures.

Methods: The analysis used data from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey, which investigated the current prevalence and exposure circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including formaldehyde, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures.

Results: Of the 4993 included respondents, 124 (2.5%) were identified as probably being exposed to formaldehyde in the course of their work [extrapolated to 2.6% of the Australian working population-265 000 (95% confidence interval 221 000-316 000) workers]. Most (87.1%) were male. About half worked in technical and trades occupations. In terms of industry, about half worked in the construction industry. The main circumstances of exposure were working with particle board or plywood typically through carpentry work, building maintenance, or sanding prior to painting; with the more common of other exposures circumstances being firefighters involved in fighting fires, fire overhaul, and clean-up or back-burning; and health workers using formaldehyde when sterilizing equipment or in a pathology laboratory setting. The use of control measures was inconsistent.

Conclusion: Workers are exposed to formaldehyde in many different occupational circumstances. Information on the exposure circumstances can be used to support decisions on appropriate priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to formaldehyde, and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to formaldehyde.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚工作暴露研究:职业性暴露于甲醛的普遍性。
前言:本研究的目的是对与工作有关的甲醛暴露的流行程度进行基于人群的估计,确定暴露的主要情况,并描述旨在减少这些暴露的工作场所控制措施的使用情况。方法:分析使用了澳大利亚工作场所暴露研究的数据,这是一项全国性的电话调查,调查了目前18-65岁澳大利亚工人中38种已知或疑似致癌物质的流行程度和暴露情况,包括甲醛。使用基于网络的工具occidea,收集了受访者在当前工作中暴露的半定量信息。问题主要是针对所承担的任务,而不是关于自我报告的暴露。结果:在所包括的4993名受访者中,124名(2.5%)被确定可能在工作过程中暴露于甲醛[推断为2.6%的澳大利亚工作人口-265 000名(95%置信区间为221 000-316 000名)工人]。其中男性居多(87.1%)。大约一半的人从事技术和贸易职业。在行业方面,大约一半的人在建筑业工作。接触的主要环境是与刨花板或胶合板一起工作,通常是通过木工工作、建筑维修或油漆前的打磨;与其他更常见的暴露情况是消防员参与灭火,消防检修,清理或反燃烧;卫生工作者在消毒设备或在病理实验室环境中使用甲醛。控制措施的使用不一致。结论:工人在许多不同的职业环境中暴露于甲醛。有关接触情况的信息可用于支持决定干预和控制职业性接触甲醛的适当优先事项,以及估计职业性接触甲醛引起的癌症负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Non-compliance of Asbestos Occupational Standards in Brake Repair Workers. Whole Body Vibration Exposures and Health Status among Professional Truck Drivers: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Physicochemical Characterization of Aerosol Generated in the Gas Tungsten Arc Welding of Stainless Steel. Effect of Occupational Exposure on A(H1N1)pdm09 Infection and Hospitalization. A Systematic Review of Reported Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1