Biological variation of thromboelastrography variables in 10 clinically healthy horses.

Jennifer L Scruggs, Bente Flatland, Karen A McCormick, Ann Reed
{"title":"Biological variation of thromboelastrography variables in 10 clinically healthy horses.","authors":"Jennifer L Scruggs,&nbsp;Bente Flatland,&nbsp;Karen A McCormick,&nbsp;Ann Reed","doi":"10.1111/vec.12410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the utility of population-based reference intervals (PRIs) for interpreting thromboelastography (TEG) variables in horses using biological variation data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort biologic variation study conducted over a 5-week period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Veterinary teaching hospital and research facility.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Ten clinically healthy horses randomly selected from a veterinary school research and teaching herd.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Horse health was determined using physical examination, CBC, and biochemical and coagulation profiles prior to the start of the study. Subsequently, once weekly blood sampling for TEG testing was performed for 5 weeks.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The 4 TEG variables reaction time (R), clot formation time (K), angle, and maximum amplitude (MA) were measured, and coefficient of variation representing within- and between-horse biological variation (CVi and CVg , respectively) and coefficient of variation representing analytical variation (CVa ) were calculated using a nested ANOVA after removing outlier data. The CVi , CVg , and CVa for R were 26.8%, 5.2%, and 5.9%; for K were 31.0%, 0.0%, and 5.9%; for angle were 9.4%, 6.2%, and 21.7%; and for MA were 3.4%, 4.1%, and 4.4%, respectively. Index of individuality (IOI) was then calculated for each variable using the formula {( CVi² + CVa²/CVg²)}¹/². IOI for R was 5.3, for angle was 3.8, and for MA was 1.4; IOI was not assessed for K.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRIs are appropriate for TEG variables, R, angle, and MA when interpreting results from individual horses based on calculated IOI values equal to or greater than 1.4. PRIs are likely appropriate when interpreting K, but IOI could not be calculated for this variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":"26 1","pages":"80-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12410","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: To assess the utility of population-based reference intervals (PRIs) for interpreting thromboelastography (TEG) variables in horses using biological variation data.

Design: Prospective cohort biologic variation study conducted over a 5-week period.

Setting: Veterinary teaching hospital and research facility.

Animals: Ten clinically healthy horses randomly selected from a veterinary school research and teaching herd.

Interventions: Horse health was determined using physical examination, CBC, and biochemical and coagulation profiles prior to the start of the study. Subsequently, once weekly blood sampling for TEG testing was performed for 5 weeks.

Measurements and main results: The 4 TEG variables reaction time (R), clot formation time (K), angle, and maximum amplitude (MA) were measured, and coefficient of variation representing within- and between-horse biological variation (CVi and CVg , respectively) and coefficient of variation representing analytical variation (CVa ) were calculated using a nested ANOVA after removing outlier data. The CVi , CVg , and CVa for R were 26.8%, 5.2%, and 5.9%; for K were 31.0%, 0.0%, and 5.9%; for angle were 9.4%, 6.2%, and 21.7%; and for MA were 3.4%, 4.1%, and 4.4%, respectively. Index of individuality (IOI) was then calculated for each variable using the formula {( CVi² + CVa²/CVg²)}¹/². IOI for R was 5.3, for angle was 3.8, and for MA was 1.4; IOI was not assessed for K.

Conclusions: PRIs are appropriate for TEG variables, R, angle, and MA when interpreting results from individual horses based on calculated IOI values equal to or greater than 1.4. PRIs are likely appropriate when interpreting K, but IOI could not be calculated for this variable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10匹临床健康马血栓弹性成像变量的生物学变异。
目的:评估基于人群的参考区间(PRIs)在利用生物变异数据解释马的血栓弹性成像(TEG)变量方面的效用。设计:为期5周的前瞻性队列生物学变异研究。环境:兽医教学医院和研究机构。动物:从兽医学校的研究和教学群中随机选择10匹临床健康的马。干预措施:在研究开始前,通过体格检查、全血细胞计数、生化和凝血分析来确定马的健康状况。随后,每周抽血1次进行TEG检测,持续5周。测量结果及主要结果:测量TEG 4个变量反应时间(R)、凝块形成时间(K)、角度和最大振幅(MA),并在剔除异常数据后,使用嵌套方差分析计算代表马内和马间生物变异的变异系数(CVi和CVg)和代表分析变异的变异系数(CVa)。R的CVi、CVg和CVa分别为26.8%、5.2%和5.9%;K值分别为31.0%、0.0%和5.9%;角度分别为9.4%、6.2%和21.7%;MA分别为3.4%、4.1%和4.4%。然后使用公式{(CVi²+ CVa²/CVg²)}¹/²计算每个变量的个性指数(IOI)。R的IOI为5.3,角度为3.8,MA为1.4;结论:当基于等于或大于1.4的计算IOI值来解释单个马的结果时,pri适用于TEG变量、R、角度和MA。当解释K时,pri可能是合适的,但是IOI不能计算这个变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine. Development and implementation of a hemovigilance program at a university veterinary teaching hospital. 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2021. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1