Interpreting histopathology in the epididymis.

Spermatogenesis Pub Date : 2015-01-08 eCollection Date: 2014-05-01 DOI:10.4161/21565562.2014.979114
Wilma De Grava Kempinas, Gary Robert Klinefelter
{"title":"Interpreting histopathology in the epididymis.","authors":"Wilma De Grava Kempinas,&nbsp;Gary Robert Klinefelter","doi":"10.4161/21565562.2014.979114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While most of this Special Issue is devoted to the testis (which is where most drug and chemically induced toxicity of the male reproductive tract is identified), being able to recognize and understand the potential effects of toxicants on the epididymis is immensely important and an area that is often overlooked. The epididymis is the organ where the post-testicular sperm differentiation occurs, through a complex and still not completely understood sperm maturation process, allowing them to fertilize the oocyte. Also in the epididymis, sperm are stored until ejaculation, while being protected from immunogenic reaction by a blood-epididymis barrier. From a toxicologic perspective the epididymis is inherently complicated as its structure and function can be altered both indirectly and directly. In this review we will discuss the factors that must be considered when attempting to distinguish between indirect and direct epididymal toxicity and highlight what is currently known about mechanisms of epididymal toxicants, using the rat as a reference model. We identify 2 distinguishable signature lesions - one representing androgen deprivation (secondary to Leydig cell toxicity in the testis) and another representing a direct acting toxicant. Other commonly observed alterations will also be shown and discussed. Finally, we point out that many of the key functions of the epididymis can be altered in the absence of a detectable change in tissue structure. Collectively, we hope this will provide pathologists with increased confidence in identification of epididymal toxicity and enable more informed guidance as mechanism of action is considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":22074,"journal":{"name":"Spermatogenesis","volume":"4 2","pages":"e979114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/21565562.2014.979114","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spermatogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/21565562.2014.979114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

While most of this Special Issue is devoted to the testis (which is where most drug and chemically induced toxicity of the male reproductive tract is identified), being able to recognize and understand the potential effects of toxicants on the epididymis is immensely important and an area that is often overlooked. The epididymis is the organ where the post-testicular sperm differentiation occurs, through a complex and still not completely understood sperm maturation process, allowing them to fertilize the oocyte. Also in the epididymis, sperm are stored until ejaculation, while being protected from immunogenic reaction by a blood-epididymis barrier. From a toxicologic perspective the epididymis is inherently complicated as its structure and function can be altered both indirectly and directly. In this review we will discuss the factors that must be considered when attempting to distinguish between indirect and direct epididymal toxicity and highlight what is currently known about mechanisms of epididymal toxicants, using the rat as a reference model. We identify 2 distinguishable signature lesions - one representing androgen deprivation (secondary to Leydig cell toxicity in the testis) and another representing a direct acting toxicant. Other commonly observed alterations will also be shown and discussed. Finally, we point out that many of the key functions of the epididymis can be altered in the absence of a detectable change in tissue structure. Collectively, we hope this will provide pathologists with increased confidence in identification of epididymal toxicity and enable more informed guidance as mechanism of action is considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释附睾的组织病理学。
虽然这期特刊的大部分内容都是关于睾丸的(这是男性生殖道的大多数药物和化学毒性被确定的地方),但是能够认识和理解有毒物质对附睾的潜在影响是非常重要的,也是一个经常被忽视的领域。附睾是睾丸后精子分化发生的器官,通过一个复杂且仍未完全了解的精子成熟过程,使它们与卵母细胞受精。同样在附睾中,精子被储存直到射精,同时被血附睾屏障保护免受免疫原性反应。从毒理学的角度来看,附睾本身是复杂的,因为它的结构和功能可以间接和直接改变。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论在试图区分间接和直接附睾毒性时必须考虑的因素,并强调目前已知的附睾毒性机制,使用大鼠作为参考模型。我们确定了两个可区分的标志性病变-一个代表雄激素剥夺(继发于睾丸间质细胞毒性),另一个代表直接作用的毒物。其他常见的变化也将被展示和讨论。最后,我们指出附睾的许多关键功能可以在没有可检测到的组织结构变化的情况下改变。总的来说,我们希望这将为病理学家提供鉴别附睾毒性的信心,并在考虑作用机制时提供更明智的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational characterization and integrative analysis of proteins involved in spermatogenesis Genetics of mammalian meiosis Roles of membrane and nuclear estrogen receptors in spermatogenesis Androgen regulation of spermatogenesis Cytoskeletons (F-actin) and spermatogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1